On 2009-11-13 at 00:18:47 [+0100], Matt Madia <mattmadia@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Nov 12, 2009, at 5:50 PM, "Ingo Weinhold" <ingo_weinhold@xxxxxx> > wrote: > > It would be nice, if someone went thoroughly through the POSIX specs > > and added missing stuff, but ATM I'm just adding things I currently > > need. When working recursively in the file system those *at() > > functions are really needed, if one doesn't want to construct paths > > all the time. Or use the storage kit C++ API, but that would > > needlessly pull the complete libbe. > > Could this be a possible GSoC2010 project idea? There's definitely lots of POSIX functionality missing. Some of it definitely larger tasks to implement. So I guess selected subsets would be fine for GSoC. At any rate, I've created ticket #4947 which is meant to get an overview in the first place. > And yes I'm already thinking about it :) It's never too early. :-) CU, Ingo