On 27/10/2014 01:50, Ithamar R. Adema wrote: > Hi Pawel, > > On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 1:30 AM, Paweł Dziepak <pdziepak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> 2014-10-26 15:23 GMT-07:00 <ithamar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >> These warnings are pretty uselss, aren't they? I mean, all they do is to >> produce a number of build messages so big that nobody is going to pay any >> attention to them. It would be probably a good idea to replace all of these >> with something like: >> >> panic("Function %s is not implemented yet.", __PRETTY_FUNCTION__); >> >> This way we would only get an information when the function is actually >> needed and, unlike compile time warnings, that information would be hard to >> miss (what hopefully would prevent problems similar to the one this patch >> fixes). >> > > Totally agree, and already had a similar discussion with Ingo about this, > and planning to clean them all up this coding sprint. Just want to get some > actual functionality done first ;-) Well,back when I added them everywhere starting with m68k, panic() was not even implemented anyway :D François.