John Scipione <jscipione@xxxxxxxxx> schrieb: > I don't think using a pointer without checking if it is NULL is a > very > good idea even if you think it can't be NULL, even so, I reverted the > change. If you write the code in a way that some pointer should never be NULL, it is not a good idea to check for it and then silently ignore the NULL. When the pointer is suddendly NULL although it should never be, the program *should* crash - otherwise it is then in an undefined state and keeps running, and that could result in even worse things. -- So long, jua