Am 20.11.2012 um 16:15 schrieb Stephan Aßmus: > Probably more convenient to use than my proposed T* Array() method, but I > sort of avoid that stuff, since it hides a bit more and may leave someone > wondering. At least those self-taught types like yours truly. :-) Yeah, true. I had "A(x, y) = val" once at work and looked for hours for the macro. Turns out it was operator() ;). But in this case, it looks rather ugly to always call Array() - kinda looks the same like with auto_ptr, which was already called ugly on this list today ;). -- Jonathan