From the PM on the GP Product Team: "The new CSEs will not process the old PolicyMaker settings." So sadly, it sounds like your answer is "yes". I wonder if you could hack this by installing the GPP extensions first then installing the DesktopStandard ones (assuming the GUIDs aren't the same). Darren From: gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Nelson, Jamie R Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 3:05 PM To: gptalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [gptalk] Re: Group Policy Preference Client Side Extensions now available Okay, so if it removes the Policy Maker CSEs it would only be logical for GPP to process GPOs created with Policy Maker settings.Is MS basically saying we need to scrap any GPOs created with PolicyMaker and recreate them using GPP (since the CSEs can't co-exist)? Jamie Nelson | Systems Engineer | Systems Support, Information Technology | I N T E G R I S Health | Phone 405.552.0903 | Fax 405.553.5687 | <http://www.integrisok.com/> http://www.integrisok.com From: gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of FlowMaN Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 12:39 PM To: gptalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [gptalk] Re: Group Policy Preference Client Side Extensions now available No. GPP CSE installer removes the Policy maker CSEs. -- Otto Horvath [MS MVP - Group Policy] On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 6:58 PM, Nelson, Jamie R <Jamie.Nelson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: So can both the PolicyMaker and Group Policy Preference extensions co-exist on the same system? Jamie Nelson | Systems Engineer | Systems Support, Information Technology | I N T E G R I S Health | Phone 405.552.0903 | Fax 405.553.5687 | <http://www.integrisok.com/> http://www.integrisok.com From: gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of FlowMaN Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 11:47 AM To: gptalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [gptalk] Re: Group Policy Preference Client Side Extensions now available GP Team, I think Mark Gray said that, in a live meeting session. -- Otto Horvath [MS MVP - Group Policy] On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 6:39 PM, Darren Mar-Elia <darren@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Who is "they"? J From: gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of FlowMaN Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 9:38 AM To: gptalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [gptalk] Re: Group Policy Preference Client Side Extensions now available Interesting. They said that, you have to choose between Policy Maker Settings and GPP. Technically it's compatible, but you can't use them together. Otto Horvath [MS MVP - Group Policy] On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 6:11 PM, Nelson, Jamie R <Jamie.Nelson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Will the GP Preference extensions process old PolicyMaker based settings? Haven't tested it yet, but thought I would check with the group to see if anyone knows offhand. Jamie Nelson | Systems Engineer | Systems Support, Information Technology | I N T E G R I S Health | Phone 405.552.0903 | Fax 405.553.5687 | <http://www.integrisok.com/> http://www.integrisok.com From: gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Darren Mar-Elia Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 11:02 AM To: gptalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [gptalk] Re: Group Policy Preference Client Side Extensions now available Thanks for the update Scott. I heard some rumor about the 27th for this stuff formally appearing on the various download sites, so maybe tomorrow. From: gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Scott Klassen Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 8:59 AM To: gptalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [gptalk] Group Policy Preference Client Side Extensions now available Group Policy Preference Client Side Extensions are now live at the MS Download Center. Still no sign of RSAT though. Scott Klassen From: gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Darren Mar-Elia Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 9:54 AM To: gptalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [gptalk] Re: Port Traffic For GPO If this is not Vista clients, then the following should cover it: ICMP LDAP: TCP 389 SMB: TCP 445 RPC Port Mapper: TCP 135 and then >1024 after the RPC connection is set up. Kerberos (Can't remember if this is UDP or TCP in all cases but Port 88) Darren From: gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jonathan Finkbiner Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 7:48 AM To: gptalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [gptalk] Port Traffic For GPO Quick and easy question: What TCP port(s?) does GPO traffic traverse? I have some software firewalls deployed in the field that I believe are blocking ports needed for proper application of policies. Jonathan Finkbiner <mailto:jfinkbiner@xxxxxxx> Information Services Support Analyst Lifestyle Family Fitness <http://www.lff.com/> _____ This e-mail may contain identifiable health information that is subject to protection under state and federal law. This information is intended to be for the use of the individual named above. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited and may be punishable by law. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please notify us immediately by electronic mail (reply). _____ This e-mail may contain identifiable health information that is subject to protection under state and federal law. This information is intended to be for the use of the individual named above. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited and may be punishable by law. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please notify us immediately by electronic mail (reply). _____ This e-mail may contain identifiable health information that is subject to protection under state and federal law. This information is intended to be for the use of the individual named above. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited and may be punishable by law. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please notify us immediately by electronic mail (reply). _____ This e-mail may contain identifiable health information that is subject to protection under state and federal law. This information is intended to be for the use of the individual named above. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited and may be punishable by law. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please notify us immediately by electronic mail (reply). _____ This e-mail may contain identifiable health information that is subject to protection under state and federal law. This information is intended to be for the use of the individual named above. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited and may be punishable by law. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please notify us immediately by electronic mail (reply). _____ This e-mail may contain identifiable health information that is subject to protection under state and federal law. This information is intended to be for the use of the individual named above. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited and may be punishable by law. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please notify us immediately by electronic mail (reply).