[gps-talkusers] Re: what do we really want from GPS?

  • From: "gerry leary" <lgerry3@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: gps-talkusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 05:55:06 -0600

Hello there,

I hope that I don't cause trouble here, because I think that this type of discussion is fun and can be productive. My favorite type of device would be called something like a portable work station. This would be the type of device that would have places to slide different units into it. You could carry the whole thing around if you wanted. Also if you only wanted maybe GPS you could slide that piece out and carry it with you. That way you wouldn't have to carry everything if you didn't want it. When I had a trekker it was nice to have something small to work with. I can't wait until Visuaide gets the Bluetooth part working so that you don't have to have any strap at all. I haven't seen the PK yet, but I don't have the money to afford it. Gerry
----- Original Message ----- From: "liam" <liam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <gps-talkusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, April 17, 2005 2:24 PM
Subject: [gps-talkusers] Re: what do we really want from GPS?



Yusuf

The question maybe more about what do we want from the equipment package
we have to carry each day. I want it to be light, run for ever on one
set of power cells, be reprogrammable and it must replace most of the
other electronic devices I carry.  Not untypically, an mp3 player, cell
phone, mini disc recorder with mic, braille note pk and gps.  And on
really bad days add a lap top and portable scanner to that lot.  For me
the pK is as yet the most versatile option for note takers but it was
its ability to run the GPS that really made the decision for us.  We may
well have stayed with the competition if it had fielded a credible GPs
alternative in real time.

I don't think the PK is any bulkier than the trekker.  It seems to run
longer on batteries than the trekker and seems a little more robust in
terms of software reliability.  I am not a good person to quiz on
complexity as I prefer things to be either totally simple or totally
complex.  So I would want a talking GPS that operated like a simple
visual GPS or I want something that will give me everything. The areas
for development with the PK version in the UK remain the POI database
which is significantly out of date and the absence of a postal code look
up.  You can work around these but they are a bit of a pain.  I wish
also that the PK builders had used a more standard type power connector,
maybe something like a nokia connector so that we could use the
disposable emergency power cells you can get for phones.  Or of course
they could supply a custom version of the same type of unit.  I've had
PK run out of juice at a couple of inconvenient moments.  The blue
logger comes with a spare battery and the charger base can charge this
battery along with the main unit.  An inspired accessory if ever there
was one.

Now what we really want is a 40 gig hard drive built in to the pk so it
can then have a serious media player that behaves like an IPOD and can
manage books from audible, daisy etc. come on guys one gig  flash cards
will go the way of floppy discs soon.



-----Original Message-----
From: gps-talkusers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:gps-talkusers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of yusuf
Sent: 17 April 2005 20:59
To: GPS-talks
Subject: [gps-talkusers] what do we really want from GPS?


Hi all, this is a topic I've been thinking about for quite a while and wanted to se what other people thought. Let me start by clarifying what I mean. I don't mean in terms of what the GPS actually does. I for one am quite happy with what Trekker can do. What I am refering to is the way GPS systems for the blind seem to be becoming more complex. Let me try and explain. When I bought my trekker in September of 2003 I bought it in order to use it when I was out and about. for the weekly shopping trip, for when I wanted to go and hang out with mates at the pub, to go to the cinema, you get the idea. for these occasions I don't want a device that can write notes, input diary entries, play Mp3s and on and on, I simply want a satellite navigation system that is small and easy to carry. I suppose my worry is that the more complex the functionality becomes the more likely it is to be larger and more things to go wrong. I don't think trekker is getting larger and didn't the Braille Note recently get smaller? But I don't know about anyone else all I want from my GPS is accurate information on where I am, what streets are coming up, nearby POIs, the ability to input my own ones, creation of various kinds of routes using various start and end points, pedestrian and vehicular modes, all the various information options like number of satellites in view, a mode for non mapped areas and oh yes up to date POIs. In terms of the Trekker it makes sense for the visuaide to make the rest of the functionality of the Ipaq accessible because otherwise youve got a PDA that you can hardly use. But I never wanted to use the PDA in the first place. Certainly when I upgrade to Maestro it will be nice to have that access but the main purpose for me will still be as a mobility aid. When I go shopping, or to the pub, or the cinema, or a restaurant etc thats all its needed for. Am I completely crazy? Or am I on to something here. Yusuf





__________ NOD32 1.1067 (20050417) Information __________

This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.nod32.com




Other related posts: