2012/11/3 Brian Bourke-Martin <brianbourke75@xxxxxxxxx>: > Well, I just tried it in my browser and it continues to return non-empty > contents on the third attempt, so I think something has either changed since > the documents were writen in the API or there is a bug. Sounds like a bug to me then. Please file a bug at http://bugs.gpodder.org/ (gpodder.net product, Advanced API component) and I'm sure Stefan will have a look at it in the next few days. If it's not a bug in the API itself, it's a documentation bug, and we have to fix that. Thanks, Thomas > On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 7:51 PM, Thomas Perl <th.perl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Hi Brian, >> >> 2012/11/2 Brian Bourke-Martin <brianbourke75@xxxxxxxxx>: >> > In the documentation it says that the time stamp in the >> > return data should be sent back upon further calls to this function, but >> > when I do two calls in a row (the first one with timestamp=0) the second >> > returns a lot of information where I would expect it to be empty since >> > there >> > have not been any modifications since the previous update call. Am I >> > doing >> > something wrong or misunderstanding? >> >> We'll have to wait for Stefan's reply for a definitive answer. Until >> then, you could try out the following: >> >> What happens at the third call with the timestamp returned by the second >> call? >> >> Thanks, >> Thomas >> >