[glideplan_swproj] Re: libraries
- From: Cestmir Houska <czestmyr@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: glideplan_swproj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 17:21:54 +0100
Yes, I meant non-plugin libraries. But I just realized that at the
beginning of the project, we had some problem with static vs. dynamic
linking. I just can't remember what it was...
Cestmir
2012/2/7 Tomáš Zámečník <pulcik@xxxxxxxx>:
> You mean linked during build?
> Because of the possibility of adding/removing single plugins.
> In case of non-plugin libraries I agree. I think they could be static.
>
> T.
>
>> ------------ Původní zpráva ------------
>> Od: Cestmir Houska <czestmyr@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Předmět: [glideplan_swproj] libraries
>> Datum: 07.2.2012 16:46:31
>> ----------------------------------------
>> HI,
>>
>> I am searching for the solution to the problem with linking of
>> libraries on Linux (and possibly Mac) and it suddenly struck me - why
>> don't we make all the libraries static??
>>
>> Cestmir
>>
>> To visit archive or unsubscribe, follow:
>> //www.freelists.org/list/glideplan_swproj
>>
>>
>>
>
> To visit archive or unsubscribe, follow:
> //www.freelists.org/list/glideplan_swproj
To visit archive or unsubscribe, follow:
//www.freelists.org/list/glideplan_swproj
Other related posts:
