[gha] ideas of key thinkers

  • From: Wadlowz@xxxxxxx
  • To: gha@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, dbrohawn@xxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2013 03:54:44 -0400 (EDT)

  
Dear Prof Crane,
 
    I was interested in reading your note  to Dawn in the GHA exchanges 
about a list you had made in 1964 about the  premises of leading thinkers. If 
you still have a copy of the list, I would be  glad to read it as I tend to 
write up ideas around personalities; I post below a  recent article published 
in Ovi (a Finland-based on-line site) along these  lines.
 
    Best wishes, Rene Wadlow
 
     (http://www.ovimagazine.com/lang/de)  
(http://www.ovimagazine.com/lang/el)  (http://www.ovimagazine.com/lang/en)  (
http://www.ovimagazine.com/lang/es)  (http://www.ovimagazine.com/lang/fi)  
(http://www.ovimagazine.com/lang/fr)  (http://www.ovimagazine.com/static/6)  
(http://www.ovimagazine.com/lang/pt)  (http://www.ovimagazine.com/static/6)     
   Kenneth Waltz : The 
Passing of the Second  Generation of the Realists
by Rene  Wadlow
2013-06-03  10:33:10  Print - Comment - Send to a Friend - _More from this  
Author_ (http://www.ovimagazine.com/auth/Rene%20Wadlow)    
(http://del.icio.us/post?url=http://www.ovimagazine.com/art/10012&title=Kenneth 
Waltz : The 
Passing of the Second Generation of the Realists by Rene Wadlow)  
(http://reddit.com/submit?url=http://www.ovimagazine.com/art/10012&title=Kenneth
 Waltz 
: The Passing of the Second Generation of the Realists by Rene Wadlow)  
(http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=http://www.ovimagazine.com/art/10012&title=
Kenneth Waltz : The Passing of the Second Generation of the Realists by 
Rene Wadlow)  
(http://www.digg.com/submit?phase=2&url=http://www.ovimagazine.com/art/10012&title=Kenneth
 Waltz : The Passing of the Second Generation of 
the Realists by Rene Wadlow&bodytext=The death of Professor Kenneth Waltz on 
12 May 2013 in New York City at the age of 88 marks the start of the passing 
of the second generation of the realist school in the study of international 
relations. The first generation was a trio marked by the 
poli&topic=world_news)  
(http://www.stumbleupon.com/submit?url=http://www.ovimagazine.com/art/10012&title=Kenneth
 Waltz : The Passing of the Second Generation of the 
Realists by Rene Wadlow)    
The death of Professor Kenneth Waltz on 12 May 2013 in  New York City at 
the age of 88 marks the start of the passing of the  second generation of the 
realist school in the study of  international relations. The first 
generation was a trio marked by  the politics of Europe between the two world 
wars: 
E.H. Carr (1),  Frederick L. Schuman (2) and Hans Morgenthau (3).  The second 
 generation, also a trio, is marked by the start of the Cold War and  a 
bi-polar balance-of-power: Kenneth Waltz (4), Henry Kissinger (5),  and Stanley 
Hoffmann(6).

Waltz was often referred to  as a “neorealist” to distinguish him from the 
writers of the first  generation, especially from Hans Morgenthau , but the 
difference was  more a question of age and formative experience than a real 
 difference of approach, although Waltz was critical of Morgenthau’s  ‘
Germanic’ emphasis on ‘the will to power’ which motivates everyone  but 
especially those in control of state policy. 

Waltz  called himself a “structural realist” — a better term for his  
emphasis on the behaviour of states as determined by the structures  of the 
world society rather than by domestic motivations or the  personality of state 
leaders. Waltz attacks “reductionist theories”  which explain the foreign 
policy behaviour of states exclusively in  terms of causes at the national 
level of analysis, for example,  Lenin’s theory of imperialism because it 
explains expansionist  behaviour in terms of the accumulation dynamics of 
national  capitalism.

Because structures change slowly and impose  limits to choice international 
relations are characterized by  continuity.  As he notes in the 
introduction to his Man, The  State, and War “Social scientists, realizing from 
their 
studies how  firmly the present is tied to the past and how intimately the 
parts  of a system depend upon each other, are inclined to be conservative  in 
estimating the possibilities of achieving a radically better  world.”  By ‘
social scientists’ he was referring particularly  to himself.  He was 
critical of those who were arguing that  international relations were 
undergoing 
a radical transformation  because of the growing interdependence of the 
international economy  or the fear of a nuclear war.  He maintained that states 
 
operate under severe constraints created by the position of a small  number 
of “Great Powers” and thus a balance-of-power  system.

Unlike his second generation colleagues, Henry  Kissinger who became an 
active political actor and Stanley Hoffmann  who wrote extensively on current 
political events, Waltz was nearly  exclusively concerned with working on the 
theoretical implications  of the distribution of power and of the resulting 
balance-of-power.  Waltz was critical of those who saw Soviet policy as 
motivated by  Communist ideology or by the personality of its leaders.  Waltz  
stressed that the requirements of state action are imposed by the  
circumstances in which all states exist. “A theory of international  politics 
can 
leave aside variations in the composition of states and  in the resources and 
technology they command because the logic of  anarchy does not vary with its 
content.”

Nevertheless, Waltz  held that world institutions and institutionalized 
methods of  altering and adjusting interests are important.  He placed an  
emphasis on the skills of diplomats, their ability to analyse  situations and 
to 
propose adjustments.

For those like myself  whose emphasis is on the emerging world society and 
a world citizen  ideology, Waltz’s approach is a constant reminder of the 
importance  of structures which determine processes, world politics as a  “
self-sustaining system.”  I think that we are moving beyond  the realpolitik  
so often linked to a balance-of-power  approach. I believe that he 
underestimated the role of ideas and  ideology in world politics and thus 
largely 
failed to see the  importance of the growth of a cosmopolitan spirit as 
expressed by  world citizens.  Nevertheless Waltz was an important voice  
during the 
Cold War years in which US policy makers too often became  the ideological 
mirrors of the Soviets, stressing the need to expand  ‘democracy’ and ‘the 
free world’ as opposed to the Soviet’s  ‘socialism’.

Notes

1) E.H. Carr’s most influential work is The Twenty  Years’ Crisis (1939).  
For a good biography of Carr, his  approach and also his later work on the 
history of the Soviet Union,  see Charles Jones E.H. Carr and International 
Relations  (1998)

2) Frederick L. Schuman International Politics, first  published in 1933, 
with many later editions, constantly revised to  take in current events, 
especially the start of World War II. For  his analysis of the world 
citizen/world federalist movement see his  The Commonwealth of Man.

3) Hans J. Morgenthau Politics Among  Nations, first published in 1948 also 
was revised to highlight  events but the basic analysis remained the same. 
For a good  biography with an emphasis on his early years in Germany and  
Switzerland before World War II, see Christoph Frei Hans J.  Morgenthau: An 
Intellectual Biography (2001)

4) Kenneth  Waltz’s two major theoretical works, written 20 years apart are 
Man,  The State and War (1959) and Theory of International Politics  (1979)

5) Henry Kissinger’s theoretical writings are  overshadowed by his 
political activities which he sets out in White  House Years (1979) and Years 
of 
Upheaval (1982).  For a  combination of theory and analysis of then current 
world events, it  would be worth reading the editorials in the 1950s that he 
wrote in  Confluence published by Harvard University.  It was as editor  of 
Confluence that we exchanged correspondence. I have always  thought that he 
was a first-rate editor.

6) Stanley  Hoffmann’s most theoretical work is The State of War (1965). 
For his  combination of theory and analysis of current policies see  Gulliver’
s Trouble or The Setting of American Foreign Policy (1968)  and Dead Ends: 
American Foreign Policy in the New Cold War  (1983) 
******************************************************** 
Rene  Wadlow, President, Association of World Citizens 

Other related posts:

  • » [gha] ideas of key thinkers - Wadlowz