Dearest Takis, Your opinion is marvelous I agree with your conclusion. Love &
Best regards, Kae Morii
----- Original Message -----
From: Takis Ioannides <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Leo Semashko <leo.semashko@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "gha@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <gha@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "gha-peace@xxxxxxxxxxxxx"
<gha-peace@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "ghausa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <ghausa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
"womengha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <womengha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
wwpo-paz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Subhash Chandra <schandra101@xxxxxxxxx>;
"maitreyee25@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <maitreyee25@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
"pravatkumar.dhal@xxxxxxxxx" <pravatkumar.dhal@xxxxxxxxx>;
"theamarierobert@xxxxxx" <theamarierobert@xxxxxx>; Glenn Sankatsing
<glennsankatsing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Prof Bishnu Pathak <pathakbishnu@xxxxxxxxx>;
Michael Ellis <mindquest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "bernces1@xxxxxxxxx"
<bernces1@xxxxxxxxx>; "ekahan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <ekahan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
"aayoamale@xxxxxxxxx" <aayoamale@xxxxxxxxx>; "nenadjavornik@xxxxxxxxx"
<nenadjavornik@xxxxxxxxx>; "nmlarik@xxxxxxxxxxx" <nmlarik@xxxxxxxxxxx>;
"steveamoah@xxxxxxxxx" <steveamoah@xxxxxxxxx>; "roberts_susana@xxxxxxxxxxx"
<roberts_susana@xxxxxxxxxxx>; "delasnievedaspet@xxxxxxxxx"
<delasnievedaspet@xxxxxxxxx>; "mcrisazcona@xxxxxxxxx" <mcrisazcona@xxxxxxxxx>;
"guy.crequie@xxxxxxxxxx" <guy.crequie@xxxxxxxxxx>; "moriikae@xxxxxxxxx"
<moriikae@xxxxxxxxx>; "hhabyarimanaheli@xxxxxxxxx"
<hhabyarimanaheli@xxxxxxxxx>; "leelaprd@xxxxxxxxxxx" <leelaprd@xxxxxxxxxxx>;
"ammarbanni@xxxxxxxx" <ammarbanni@xxxxxxxx>; "arvind.mahapatra@xxxxxxxxx"
<arvind.mahapatra@xxxxxxxxx>; "bolekiaj@xxxxxxx" <bolekiaj@xxxxxxx>;
"earthstarradio@xxxxxxx" <earthstarradio@xxxxxxx>; "president92@xxxxxxxxx"
<president92@xxxxxxxxx>; "pawlik.lucas@xxxxxxxxx" <pawlik.lucas@xxxxxxxxx>;
"waheed2010@xxxxxxxxxxx" <waheed2010@xxxxxxxxxxx>; "lanayang@xxxxxxx"
<lanayang@xxxxxxx>; Mitch Gold <poforpeace@xxxxxxxxx>;
"vincedhimos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <vincedhimos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
"fdorrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <fdorrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "millenarts_defis@xxxxxxxx"
<millenarts_defis@xxxxxxxx>; "bella.ventura@xxxxxxxxx"
<bella.ventura@xxxxxxxxx>; "Knox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
<Knox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; RJBurrowes & AMcKone <flametree@xxxxxxxxxx>; Matjaž
Mulej <matjaz.mulej@xxxxx>; Rudolf Siebert <rsieb3@xxxxxxx>; "rwayman@xxxxxxxx"
<rwayman@xxxxxxxx>; Adam Greenwell <towngreenmusic@xxxxxxxxx>; Gianluigi
Segalerba <gianluigi.segalerba@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Ellen Brown
<ellenhbrown@xxxxxxxxx>; gianluigisegalerba@xxxxxxxxx; Ananta Giri
<aumkrishna@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2020/1/22, Wed 09:17
Subject: [gha] Re: Start of the Gandhicracy joint work
Dear Dr Leo,Dr Subhash and members peacemakers of GHA, I read the messageabout
Gandhicracy. I watched in the text the term TRADITIONAL DEMOCRACY
(Attributes)under it, with well know pathogenic ofour planet.I wouldlike to
propose the following about them all :To understand the nature, or what kind
ofpolitical system we have, we need to consider the relationship between the
societyand the politics. As the newest science that creates ideologies and not
science, tells us : 1) If we give a political system and a Parliament,and
we accept the many parties, and we do elections, and we elect members
ofParliament, people's representatives, that the system has become democratic
andrepresentative. Modern times tell usthat this is representation and
democracy. At the same time, ownership andrepresentation cannot be developed
within the same country, as these are twodifferent political systems. The state
includes public administration, justice,security forces, the military, so it
has political sovereignty, since the stateis the owner of the system. Society
is out of the political system. Since thestate holds everything, there is a
dichotomy between it and society. Today whenwe talk about power we mean
politics, and when we talk about politics we meanpower. Politics is the
phenomenon which organizes, or breaks down a society. Andthe question is how
this society is constituted. If it is constituted in theway of power, the
distinction between the one making the decision and the onebeing governed, then
politics is identified with the power. This happens at themoment of decision.
When we talk about a political system, we are talking abouta political system.
So the political system is identical with the state. policiesare those that
derive from one who holds the political system. talking about apolitical system
and a state is tautology. so everything was handed over to thestate. Society
itself was given to the state. The citizen has individualfreedom, he has
rights, but he has neither political nor social freedom. He isan imperfect
citizen. Today's state says that the state represents the nation.but the power
to determine what the state is, what is in its interest, andwhere it will be
granted. so the decisions to be taken are up to the state. theone who decides
what is national, he will also make the decisions about it.that is, he is , the
one who gives the orders, and at the same time theassignee implementing these
policies. Society today has great selfishness andpeculiarities according to
modern scientific theories, therefore is unable todecide. It is the one who
holds knows very well and holds the affairs, the one who decides, not the
citizens. theprinciple of the so-called separation of powers seeks to make an
internaldistribution of political responsibilities. Not to have everything only
one, e.g, the monarch, the prime minister of acountry, but the parliament will
be the one who gives the orders , and thegovernment will be the assignee . This
is called executive power. This is aninternal division of government and
parliament. This was in response to earlierconditions, when the monarch was the
one who gives the orders and his ministerwas the assignee. Nowadays they try to
tell us that the one who gives theorders is the parliament and the prime
minister is the assignee. Citizen vote islegal. It is judged by the content of
the vote. The vote exists. One can voteand have no effect, one can vote and
make decisions, one can vote someone thathe can control him or not.
Theconstitution lays down the rules.According to the Constitution, all
citizenshave the right to vote and to be voted. Or they decide for me. Is
theconstitution applicable today? That means, every citizen has the right to be
acandidate. Our vote is not representative. we simply vote for those who are
chosenby the political parties, to take overpolitical domination, they do what
they want , without any control. 2) In representation. Here, the partition
takes placewithin the political system. Society is installed within the polar
system, andassume specific responsibilities related to the status of the
originator. So,on the one hand is the one who givesorders, the state, and on
the other, the assignee, the society, who ceases tobe a private citizen.
Representationmeans, e.g. in our daily lives there is someone who is going to
do something,and especially because he thinks he cannot do it by himself,
entrusts it to someone else. we want to sell ahouse, and we commission a broker
to find the client. will his relationshipwith the seller ends, when he finds
the customer? He will sell it as much as hewants? And if the seller changes his
mind and doesn't want to sell it? thereforethe commands given by the originator
relate to the content of the command. fora politician, how will he act, with
what control? The one who gives the orderse.g. to a political, gives his orders
to him to be executed within a specifiedtime, so that the politician does not
become autonomous, and does not make whathe wants and whenever he wants. So
that the politician should not beindependent from society and do what he wants.
Or, to favor those whom hewants. Therefore, the first prerequisite for making
the system representativeis that society, as the one giving the orders, assumes
the qualities of theoriginator, either to the maximum degree or to a minor
degree . Under thecondition to be existed a functionbetween the one who gives
the orders andthe assignee. Every citizen has his own opinion, but together we
cannot manageall opinions. We cannot get a new final result from all opinions.
In the Parliamenta decision comes after consultation, dialogue, voting, after
the opinions ofparty representatives have been heard. This requires the society
to become aninstitution. Because society has a large number of members and
decides tochoose some of them to represent it. That;s why Greeks managed to
create their culturein the root of their history. They managed to trap the
small scale, thus inaccessible communications conditions, so that it could
evolve in terms offreedom, and at the same time succeeded in creating an entire
world, whichjoined in this small scale, with self self-sufficiency and autonomy
and its owndynamic evolution. This explains why the Greeks walked free, without
thedespotic monarchy, and came to create democracy through representation.
hesmall scale was the springboard upon which democracy was built. We also had
asmall scale in the Homeric times, in Mycenaean times, but without democracy.
Democracywas born through the small scale after many centuries. This is a
processthrough the biology of human society over the centuries. The
representation,therefore, requires two parameters.The constitution of society
in amunicipality, and the assumption of the status of giving the orders.This
was done with the small scaleand the communication. People were meeting
somewhere and making decisions. Thegreat scale today how it can be done. With
two ways. We will be guided by thisresponsibility when the conditions are laid
down, confining the politicalsystem to the level of technology. e.g. the
Internet, with voice, picture,audio etc.. What we all do at GHA. We all
communicate together and we all co-decide.We went with technology at
infrastructure level. Communication of societies. Representationis when the one
who gives the orders is within the community and takes over theresponsibilities
of the originator. The society to be constituted technically sothat it can have
the will, and to assume the obligations of the mandates. Another wayis through
polls, without technologies. With good will, with polls, we can drawon the will
of the people, which will help us make the right decisions. 3) Democracy.
Indemocracy, the dichotomy between state, system and private society
isabolished, and the relationship between the one who gives the orders and the
assigneeis abolished, and society assumes as a City, all political
responsibility. Theideal type of democracy, according to Aristotle, is the
complete abolition ofthe nobleman. The anarchy, not as we realize it today, but
that, there must beno ruler. No one. It also informs us that the Magyar city
exercised this kindof democracy but was destroyed by anarchy. This was happened
when a group ofpeople from Sparta passed through their area, robbers killed
them. So thedecision was taken to punish them, but there was no Authority to do
so. This wasthe start . democracy makes some changes, but without changing
themunicipality. is ruled by the Municipality. There is no political leader
torule. There is a political leader who speaks, and proposes to municipality
whatto decide, what to do to govern. The municipality wants to merge some
issuewith another city. Sends a delegation that will match the wishes of
theMunicipality, The municipality wants to merge some issue with another
city.sends a delegation that will match the wishes of the Municipality, for a
singlespecific case. No one else. The onlyexception to democracy is the ten
generals. This is because the case of warcannot be made by the decisions of
ordinary citizens, but by those trained andexperienced in war. By lottery,
citizens with special knowledge are selected toexercise partial power. but they
are constantly watched by those who give themtheir commands. The municipality
decides where a case is handled, but it doesit itself. Tthe responsibilities
given to politicians are specific and clear. Whenthey sent a representative of
the city to another city to discuss a case,according to the wishes of the
Municipality, if the other city had a differentopinion, the representative
returned to his city, transferred the views ofothers to the Municipality, and
the Municipality gave him new decisions tocontinue the negotiations. The
transformation of private society into amunicipality, the originator of
political power, is the necessary backgroundfor political freedom, so that, in
conjunction with other measures, society canachieve its self-purification,
autonomy, with the democracy introduced byKlisthenes in Pnyx. 508 BC. In the
dominant, and the feudal societies, thesocial man is not constituted in terms
of freedom, he does not experience, orat least his individual freedom. The
anthropocentric world was created byHellenism, and Hellenism embodied it,
throughout its historical course. Thesystem of the Democracy of the Ancient
Greek spirit is based on three distinctprinciples: the Philosophical, the
Functional and the Procedural Principle ofthe Republic. Philosophical. This
principle is an acceptance of the principlethat all humans are of Nature equal
to God • that all humans are "born free"and therefore all have the ability to
make decisions, by the power of reason,not of instincts and incentives [i], on
issues that concern them either asindividuals or as members of society. It
follows from this principle that theparticipation of all citizens in the
exercise of power constitutes natural lawand that the contrary is a violation
of natural law; that it is an insult in the ancient Greek sense ofthe term. The
exercise of power by the competent and the moral is aself-evident need and
pursuit. Operating principle. There are so many decisionsthat concern a society
that if taken with the participation of all citizens, itwill surely lead to the
inability to exercise power; By applying only thephilosophical principle, it is
impossible for a society, but also a group offive people, to function. The
ancient Greeks had found this problem too. TheProcedural Principle • the
principle of the majority. Making a unanimousdecision from a group of people
is, with statistical legitimacy, very unlikely;it is practically impossible.
This would obviously make the system of ancientGreek democracy ineffective and
invalid.The ancient Greeks found a simple andfunctional solution to this
problem. They appointed officials that the decisionof the whole is the decision
of most of its members. This solution is widelyknown as the principle of
majority. 4) Conclusion. If the principles of the Ancient Greek Democracy
do not apply, then, we have no Democracy, but another regime thatfalsely uses
the name Democracy. The use of the name Democracy for every stateis a modern
"invention". Too many countries globally use theDEMOCRACY in front of their
name. Some of them make war crimes against humanitynowadays. We all know them.
The term “Traditional Democracy”, referred in the text of Gandhicracy,is
impiety to Democracy. What is written below this term has nothing to do
withDemocracy. Please remove the term TRADITIONAL DEMOCRACY from the book
Gandhicracy. Itwill be an action of respect, which will prevent a serious
mistake for the nameand the history of Global Harmony Association GHA., as we
built it 15 yearsago, based and operate with Democracy. By Dr Takis D
IoannidesCo-founder and Vice President of GHA Sources: Dr George Kontogiorgis
Professor ofpolitical science and history, Panteion University of Athens, f.
rector, his books, “The Greekcosmic system”,” Nation and modernity innovation”.
“The three Principles of the Republic andtheir deliberate distortions”
http://www.dd-democracy.gr/article.asp?Id=17.
Στις Κυρ, 12 Ιαν 2020 στις 7:29 μ.μ., ο/η Leo Semashko <leo.semashko@xxxxxxxxx>
έγραψε:
Dear GHA members, friends,
We are happy to present you an updated, rewritten and simplified project of the
Gandhicracy, 15 pages, published here:
https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=907 and in the attachment.
It contains a brief definition of the key resources of this book:
human/intellectual, informational and organizational. In this regard, it has
key importance for each co-author of this book as a guide to action, so we ask
that you keep it and use it throughout the year of work on the book. Of course,
this is not a dogma and we will revise some of its parts and provisions, so do
not hesitate to express your suggestions and criticism.
The start of our joint work on the Gandhicracy is defined in Paragraph 2 of
this project. In order to ensure a deep understanding and coherence of our
work, we invite all interested co-authors of the book to complete in TWO WEEKS
two small and simple intellectual tasks: do a statistical research of the
spherons of your country, city or university and write a short (up to 1 page,
no more) review of our methodological book Gandhica. You will find a detailed
description of these simple tasks in the indicated project. I am ready to help
everyone in their implementation.
Without them, the team of authors cannot have general understanding and
coherence. Therefore, they are key to the quality of our teamwork and the end
result - the book quality. They are of paramount importance for the Editorial
Board, which now includes 12 editors from 10 countries. Without carrying out
these tasks, their meaningful work is impossible. This is an intellectual test
for each author and editor of the book. We hope for your understanding and high
peacemaking responsibility.
Heartily,
Best wishes of peace from spherons harmony through
innovative science and Gandhicracy
Leo
Dr. Leo Semashko:
-State Councilor of St. Petersburg, Russia; RANH Professor;
-Philosopher, Sociologist and Peacemaker from Harmony;
-Global Harmony Association (GHA) Founder (2005) and Honorary President (2016);
-Director, GHA Website "Peace from Harmony": www.peacefromharmony.org;
Editor:
-Gandhica, 2019, book: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=848;
-Gandhicracy-2020, project: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=907;
-Golden Intellectual Fund for Gandhicracy, 2020, project:
https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=916;
-Global Peace Science, (GPS, 2016), book:
http://peacefromharmony.org/docs/global-peace-science-2016.pdf;
-NO TO USA WAR WITH RUSSIA (USA Petition):
http://diy.rootsaction.org/petitions/no-to-war-hot-or-cold-with-russia;
“THE WAR KILLED MY FATHER, AND I KILLED WAR”:
-Personal page: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=253; ;
Kae Morii
