Re ion motor. I have never thought the ion motor as very powerful, but my info was decades old..here is the latest. Keep in mind they need mass to be used up as fuel, which must be called a "fuel supply load". The reaction M x v = M x v is maximised because the ions electrical fields/charge (the power supplied) can theoretically accelerate the fuel mass to velocities approaching the speed of light. which is far more efficient than chemical fuels. Also the power available is still very limited from the solar panels. 5 kW even at 100% efficiency is not much lift. More realistic is the (not to be publicised) portable nuclear power generators that have been used in space. "Budget constraints and recent advances in solar cell technologies have ended what one industry analyst calls the Defense Department's longstanding "flirtation" with developing nuclear power sources for spacecraft, according to industry and Pentagon sources...... "The military had an ongoing flirtation with nuclear power for nearly 50 years, and now they are saying it is over," said Steven Aftergood, senior research analyst at the non-profit Federation of American Scientists, a think tank based in Washington, DC. Nuclear power offers at least a 100-fold increase in power generation over traditional technologies http://www.fas.org/sgp/news/2001/03/iaf030201.html I don't believe them. when they say its over, and the potential is far more than 100 fold. ! "Although the National Space Policy and the Defense Department's space policy require presidential approval for the launch of payloads containing nuclear reactors, that stipulation has not prevented DOD's involvement in such projects, Aftergood said. In his four years in office, former President George Bush approved two such launches." An interesting model is the "solar sail" which directly converts photon energy from the "solar wind" .. Not for orbiting satellites though. Philip. Thi ion motor. An ion engine test An ion thruster (or ion drive) is one of several types of spacecraft propulsion, specifically electric propulsion. It uses beams of ions - electrically charged atoms or molecules - for propulsion. The precise method for accelerating the ions may vary, but all designs take advantage of the charge-to-mass ratio of ions to accelerate them to very high velocities using a high electric field. Ion thrusters are therefore able to achieve high specific impulse, reducing the amount of reaction mass required, but increasing the amount of power required compared to chemical rockets. Ion thrusters can deliver one order of magnitude greater propellant efficiency than traditional liquid fuel rocket engines, but are constrained to very low accelerations by the power/weight ratios of available power systems. The principle of Ion thrusters go back to the concepts developed by the German/Austrian physicist Hermann Oberth and were published in his famous 1929 work "Die Rakete zu den Planetenräumen" (The rocket to planetary space). The first ion thrusters, known as Kaufman-type ion thrusters, were developed by Harold R. Kaufman, working for NASA in the 1960s, and were based on the Duoplasmatron. Contents [hide] a.. 1 Types of ion thruster b.. 2 General design c.. 3 Energy usage d.. 4 Thrust e.. 5 Lifespan f.. 6 Missions a.. 6.1 SERT b.. 6.2 Smart 1 c.. 6.3 Artemis d.. 6.4 Deep Space 1 e.. 6.5 Dawn f.. 6.6 Hayabusa g.. 7 Development h.. 8 Ion Engines in Popular Culture i.. 9 See also j.. 10 References k.. 11 External links ----- Original Message ----- From: Dr. Neville Jones To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 10:01 PM Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Proof of Heliocentric Incorrectness and Deception Paul, My response below in red. Neville. The 440 Newton Liquid Apogee Motor (LAM), which was used to conduct INSAT-3E orbit raising manoeuvres, has performed well. It enabled taking the satellite from its Geosynchronous Transfer Orbit (GTO) of 649 km perigee and 36,000 km apogee with an orbital inclination of 7° with respect to the equatorial plane to its present near GSO orbit with zero degree inclination. The LAM was fired for a total duration of 121 minutes in three phases on September 29, September 30 and 1st October. A total velocity of 1460 m/sec was added by LAM at the Apogee point of the orbit to take the satellite from GTO to GSO. INSAT-3E had 1592 kg propellant at the time of its injection into GTO by Ariane-5 launch vehicle on September 28. After orbit raising operations, it has 510 kg of propellant remaining that is sufficient to arrest the drift and park it at its orbital slot as well as maintain the satellite in its orbit and controlling its orientation during its design life of more than 12 years. Just to repeat, 510kg of fuel for 12 years operation. It uses fuel at the rate of 8.94kg per minute so with 510kg remaining, that means it has 57 minutes of firing time to last 12 years. This is approximately one part in 111,000. I think you can see just how unlikely it is that this amount of fuel could possibly suspend the weight of this satellite for this length of time even if its weight were just 25kg. Accordingly, I won't attempt to educate myself to a level sufficient to calculate weight at 36000km, or thruster efficiency, or anything else. I think that myth is busted! And best of all, NASA isn't involved, so you know it isn't lies! It is possible that we do not need liquid fuel thrusters for height adjustments as solar powered electrical thrusters have been developed for this purpose and have been in successful long-term operation since about 1993, I believe. Such a method would negate your comments above. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.26/748 - Release Date: 5/04/2007 3:33 PM
Attachment:
375px-Ion-engine-NASA.jpg
Description: JPEG image