[geocentrism] Two potential answers?
- From: "Gary Shelton" <garylshelton@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 22:11:53 -0600
All,
I have something I'd like to run by all of you. If we are constantly looking
for a potential "proof" of our scenario, what about this:
Philip has an idea here, perhaps. Philip recently wrote, half jokingly, that
he was going to look for the items left on the moon with his new telescope.
Well, what about doing that? Not with Philip's new telescope, but something
more powerful, much more powerful.
Am I not correct in understanding that these geosats can read the license plate
off a car here on the earth?
Well, it seems to me that this kind of power turned to the moon would easily
yield a photo that is verifiable evidence of the manmade objects left by mssrs.
Armstrong, Aldrin, and later-comers. I mean, a lunar rover is how many times
bigger than a license plate?
Of course, I can just hear the BA-er's response that we geocentrists wouldn't
believe the photos anyway so what's the use? Well, they may have a point.
Nonetheless, it does seem like an interesting exercise for all of our tax
dollars out there in space. What do you say, NASA? What kind of pics do you
have of the moon from the geosats....or HUBBLE ?
Curiously,
Gary Shelton
GaryLShelton@xxxxxxxxxxx
-- No attachments (even text) are allowed --
-- Type: text/plain
-- Desc: "AVG certification"
Other related posts:
