[geocentrism] Re: Response to Geocentric 2-pager email

  • From: "philip madsen" <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "geocentrism list" <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 08:08:20 +1000

Neville said,  "And I am beginning to think that this whole 
geocentric/heliocentric/acentric problem is a masterful piece of deception to 
keep people like us occupied and away from the important issues all around us. 
" 

But that didn't seem to work did it Neville.. Just look at the subject lines 
this list has taken... We'll all be first in line for the gas chambers..  Paul 
doesn't know what danger he is in... 

I find myself warming to the concave earth possibility that Steven is 
promoting!!

Neville

You must be getting old...  

Philip. 
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Neville Jones 
  To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 4:31 AM
  Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Response to Geocentric 2-pager email


  Bernie,

  This is a fine response.

  What truth really is, God only knows. And I am beginning to think that this 
whole geocentric/heliocentric/acentric problem is a masterful piece of 
deception to keep people like us occupied and away from the important issues 
all around us. Models constructed by someone who actually knows how the 
universe operates and has turned our perception of it inside out, if you like.

  I find myself warming to the concave earth possibility that Steven is 
promoting!!

  Neville 

  www.GeocentricUniverse.com



    -----Original Message-----
    From: bbrauer777@xxxxxxxxx
    Sent: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 10:19:12 -0800 (PST)


    Fred ( engineering specialist at satellite manufacturer ) wrote:

    Bernie,
    All theories, doctrines, laws, and "facts" are simply the product of man's 
imagination.  What else can they be?  It doesn't really matter if the earth is 
moving or stationary.  You can construct a model to fit any observation.  But 
all models have the habit of becoming ever more complicated as time goes by, 
which then provides an opportunity for man to abandon old models in favour of 
more simple ones.

    I have not yet been convinced of the Maxwell/Einstein model, which states 
that the speed of light is constant for any observer, no matter how fast he is 
moving.  I have the feeling that Maxwell "rigged the constants" of free space 
to suit his own ideas about electromagnetic radiation.  Then Einstein accepted 
Maxwell's conjectures and built on them to come to the conclusion that even 
space and time are variable - leaving only the speed of light constant.  This 
is man's imagination at its best.

    So, what is truth?  I say there is no such thing.  It's all in the mind of 
man.

    regards
    Fred 


----------------------------------------------------------------------------


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Free Online Photosharing - Share your photos online with your friends and 
family!
  Visit http://www.inbox.com/photosharing to find out more!


------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
  Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.7/1152 - Release Date: 26/11/2007 
10:50 AM

Other related posts: