[geocentrism] Re: On the flywheel
- From: Allen Daves <allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 10:19:56 -0700 (PDT)
The Aspden Effect http://www.energyscience.org.uk/le/Le30/le30.html
THE ADAMS-ASPDEN MOTOR PATENT http://www.energyscience.org.uk/le/le08.htm
UC Riverside confirmation of electostatic
spin........www.newsroom.ucr.edu/cgi-bin/display.cgi?id=548
How to get intouch with Aspden address and phone number.....
http://www.aetherometry.com/Labofex_Plasma_Physics/aspden_opinion.php
MARINOV'S AMPERE BRIDGE MOTOR http://www.energyscience.org.uk/le/le25.htm
FYI.......
The following was extracted from "THE SECRET OF THE CREATIVE VACUUM"
by John Davidson. It describes a simple but impressive experiment
that can be performed by anyone.
The Levitating Gyroscope
Professor Eric Laithwaite, Harold Aspden and the Gyroscope
As we have said, the fundamental law of all differentiated forms is
polarity or duality. It arises automatically when the One is first
overlain by the greater, Formative Mind and is multiplied and
endlessly reflected from that point into the myriad forms familiar
to us. Yet the underlying and primal polarity remains clearly
identifiable in all manifestation, even amongst the manyness in
which we presently find ourselves.
In our physics, whether conventional or vacuum state, the same
applies. All forms are interconnected and interwoven with this law
of polarity and causality. Electrostatic charge, magnetic polarity,
gravitational attraction, all these produce and are a part of the
rotation which maintains things in existence. They are all aspects
of patterning in the kaleidoscopic image we call our physical world
and think to be so real. And they are thus all related.
The one can be expressed as the other if only we can see how the
image is projected and can see how to tweak the projection system.
So motion expressed as shape and rhythm - as differentiation in
space and time - is so familiar to us that we feel that it can hold
no secrets. Yet since motion is our observation of patterns in
space and time - both intrinsic physical realities we do not really
comprehend - one cannot say that the true nature of motion is known
to us. So if certain kinds of motion produce certain unexpected
results, this is no more than we should expect, for we do not
understand how time and space have come into being in the first
place.
It is not surprising therefore that Searl, Schauberger, Saxl and
others have found intriguing and unexpected effects and
relationships. Nor are such phenomena confined to the work of
independent researchers, for in recent years work in our British
universities has demonstrated the same effect.
Four of the principle protagonists have been Professor Eric
Laithwaite, Dr. Harold Aspden, Sandy Kidd and Scott Strachan. Eric
Page 1
Laithwaite, from London University's Imperial College, has been
involved with research into magnetic levitation and gyroscope
research for many years. Harold Aspden, from the Univeristy of
Southampton, describes a simple and crucial experiment, demonstrated
for him by Professor Laithwaite.
The facts of the experiment are so remarkable that they would be
unbelievable to anyone who has not witnessed at close quarters the
demonstration by Professor Laithwaite.
He takes hold of a shaft with two hands, holding it horizontally at
knee height. An assistant then uses a power tool to spin a 50 pound
flywheel at one end of the shaft until it is rotating at several
thousand revolutions per minute.
A 50 pound wheel rotating at this speed and held away from, but
necessarily close to, the body commands respect for the dangers
involved. It is not something that one expects to manipulate with
ease. However, one is aware that one could release the hold near
the wheel and expect to be able to support the full weight of the
system by one's other hand, without having to exert a couple
manually via one's wrist, (ie. without needing to strain one's wrist
to hold the shaft horizontal with the 50 pound weight on the other
end).
Indeed, it would lie outside the capacity of human strength to apply
such a twist to the shaft axis. What should then happen is that the
wheel will precess* continuously in a horizontal plane, requiring
the holder to turn around with it, keeping a firm grip on the end of
the shaft.
* precession means that the shaft - the axis of rotation -
'fixed' at one end by one's wrist, will describe a shape
like that of a cone - or a hyperbolic spiral.
What is found, however, is that the free end of the shaft lifts with
very little effort, totally incommensurate with the 50 pound weight
at an angle of 32 degrees, which also happens to be the helix angle
of 'type A' DNA, angle 32.7 degrees.
This angle appears to be a fundamental constant and based on the
reduced lifting force required when a rotating mass is lifted at
this angle, it appears to have free energy and anti-gravity
applications.
----- Original Message ----
From: philip madsen <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Saturday, March 22, 2008 12:38:56 AM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: On the flywheel
THE ASPDEN EFFECT:
This experiment involved a gyroscope whose central wheel was fashioned from a
powerful magnet
Allen A link to a page where this can be examined would be nice Phil
----- Original Message -----
From: Allen Daves
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 6:49 AM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: On the flywheel
THE ASPDEN EFFECT:
This experiment involved a gyroscope whose central wheel was fashioned from a
powerful magnet.
The normal amount of energy that would be required to rotate the gyroscope to a
certain maximum speed was 1000 joules. Like a glass of water being stirred up
with a spoon, the rotation of the gyroscope would cause the aetheric energy
inside its central wheel to begin spiraling, and this churning movement would
continue inside the object even once Dr. Aspden brought the gyroscope to a stop.
Surprisingly, for up to 60 seconds after Aspden’s gyroscope stopped rotating,
it would take ten times less energy to return it to the same velocity as it had
attained the first time – only 100 joules.
This is another reproducible effect that has simply been ignored by the
mainstream, because it “violates the laws of physics.”
Kozyrev showed that lead (Pb) maintained its latent forces for 14 seconds and
aluminum for 28, and yet Dr. Aspden’s gyroscopes would retain their forces for
a full 60 seconds.
Dr. Nikolai A. Kozyrev
1.10 KOZYREV’S RESULTS HAVE BEEN REPLICATED, NEVER DISPROVEN
No concrete disproof of N.A. Kozyrev and V.V. Nasonov’s experimental results
exists (Levich, 1996). Independent groups of researchers have now reproduced
and confirmed some of Kozyrev’s experiments. These include A.I. Veinik from the
1960s-1980s, Lavrentyev, Yeganova et al. in 1990, Lavrentyev, Gusev et al. in
1990, and Lavrentyev et al. in 1991 and 1992. American researcher Don Savage
has also replicated much of Kozyrev’s work and published it in Speculations in
Science and Tech.
Furthermore, without any knowledge of Kozyrev’s work, in 1989 G. Hayasaka and
S. Tekeyuchi discovered similar weight-loss effects with rotating 150-gram
gyroscopes, and more recently obtained success by dropping the gyroscopes
between two precision laser beam detectors.
(Remember that a gyroscope that is being weighed in a rotating and non-rotating
state will not show any measurable weight changes unless an additional process
is introduced such as vibration, movement, (in this case dropping,) heat
conduction or electric current transition.)
The results of Hayasaka et al.’s study, conducted on behalf of the Mitsubishi
corporation, actually did make it into the mainstream media, surprisingly
enough. Furthermore, they did indeed attribute their results to the effects of
torsion fields.
Many other researchers such as Dr. S.M. Polyakov, Dr. Bruce DePalma and Sandy
Kidd have independently discovered gravitational changes with gyroscopes, but
it appears that most of them have not fully understood the fluidlike nature of
the aether, which always travels in the spiraling movement of torsion waves.
Figure 1.5 – Data of Dr. Bruce DePalma’s Spinning Ball Experiment
from Hoagland’s 1992 UN Briefing
A perfect example of harnessing torsion waves by rotation was discovered
completely independently by Dr. Bruce DePalma, frequently cited by R.C.
Hoagland et al. on the Enterprise Mission website. Within a complete vacuum,
DePalma took two steel balls and catapulted them into the air at equal angles,
with an equal amount of force.
The only difference was that one ball was rotating 27,000 times per minute and
the other was stationary. The rotating ball traveled higher into the air and
then descended faster than its counterpart, which violated all known laws of
physics.
The only explanation for this effect is that both balls are drawing energy into
themselves from an unseen source, and the rotating ball is thus “soaking up”
more of this energy than its counterpart – energy that would normally exist as
gravity, moving down into the earth.
With the addition of torsion-field research we can see that the spinning ball
was able to harness naturally spiraling torsion waves in its environment, which
gave it an additional supply of energy.
----- Original Message ----
From: Paul Deema <paul_deema@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2008 9:54:22 AM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: On the flywheel
Philip M
I am looking forward to the results of your tests because I believe -- oops! I
am very confident -- that you will show that common garden variety high school
Newtonian physics will show Aspden to be in error.
I suggest that you don't really require to time how long the process takes ie
til the wheel stops turning, but just how long it takes the weight to fall say
three feet. Aspden says it will spin up more quickly the second time (if close
to the first time). If the difference is small -- I gained the impression that
it is supposed to be large -- averaging may be necessary. You could fill in the
time between runs with another pull at your stein. That would make the whole
process more enjoyable! But do take care that your counting ability is not
impaired won't you!
I'd like to do it myself you know, but though the process is simple (if the
apparatus is before you on the bench) but if it is not, it is a semi major
undertaking. I'm afraid that is what has slowed my progress at demonstrating
the Earth's rotation in real time. I'd have to build the apparatus.
Paul D
----- Original Message ----
From: philip madsen <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: geocentrism list <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, 16 March, 2008 7:56:47 AM
Subject: [geocentrism] On the flywheel
Paul I said before that your string and weight idea was spot on.. I remembered
my Duncan & Starling 1954, edition, Hey I was exactly 20 when I paid Two pounds
nine shillings and ninepence for it. the experimen listed for all students to
do puts Aspden in the dreamtime category.. I cant see it any other way.
Basically we have a frame say 3ft high H with a large flywheel on a shaft at
top. A weight M is on the end of the string which is wound round the shaft and
allowed to drop. The drop is timed, the number of turns is noted during the
drop, and the number of turns thereafter till the wheel stops is counted.. then
all of the energy equations are worked out beginning at MgH ..
Ignoring all the rest, the point is that everybody had to make the drop several
times and time each drop, taking an average..
If there was any major deviation on the second and third drop according to
Aspden, SURELY one of the lads who come from the age where how to think and not
what to think was compulsory, would have raised an alarm?
We are talking major deviation here. Assuming Aspden is correct and should
perhaps the first drop be ignored simply because the rest all came would come
close to identical, and the averaging out reduced the amount of the anomaly, we
still would have measured work done by the flywheel after it was powered
showing a gain over input.. Unless perhaps they just put it down to bearing
losses being less than what they really were..
As much as I am reluctant to admit that students and graduates of the 40's-
50's era and earlier could make such mistakes, such as I would expect from the
illiterates of today, to give Aspden the benefit of the doubt, I feel I must
still do the experiment, but I may be wasteing my time if it wasn't for the
beer in my hand..
Will keep ya all informed.. too much at stake.. What with my solar
installation, and my monitoring of waste, I have already gotten my quarterly
power consumption down from 3,500 kwh to under 2000kwh. Since December what
with the wet season cloud and all Ive gotten nearly 400kwh from the sun, and
saved much more by putting clothes on instead of the airconditioner. (my wifes
suggestion) Just wait till I get my wind extraction machine on line. I just
hate wearing anything more than my shorts.
Phil..
Get the name you always wanted with the new y7mail email address.
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.21.7/1330 - Release Date: 15/03/2008
2:36 PM
Other related posts:
