[geocentrism] Re: Fw: Thermoenergetics: Can Hydraulics Reverse Entropy?
- From: "philip madsen" <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 10:28:32 +1000
Just a twaddle worth thinking about in all this.. Phil.
Conservation of energy
There is such a thing as conservation of energy. However our understanding of
the concept is largely incomplete. By negating the idea of an ether, which I
called "space background" (4), we have limited our conception of energy to that
which is observable on the purely physical plane. All electric and magnetic as
well as gravitational phenomena however, are not purely physical. They require
for their understanding a conception of a higher-dimensional space background,
which is, to use the term of Moray, a "sea of energy".
Conservation of energy in the current form of understanding is a useless
concept, as it negates the existence of this giant reservoir of energy, and
does not take into account the constant interchange (through the phenomena of
electricity, magnetism and gravitation), of our world of physical existence
with that reservoir. Generation of electrical energy through magnetism for
example, is not limited to the mechanical motive power applied to a generator
and the movement of electrons through a wire, but involves a complex exchange
between space background and physical machinery.
In this context, it may be profitable to remember a statement that Robert Meyer
(5) made in connection with the concept of conservation of energy. He said:
"Seeing gravity as the cause of the falling of things, we talk about
gravitation and thereby overlook, that an essential characteristic of any
ëforceí (energy) is to unify within itself the attributes of indestructibility
and mutability."
This statement should set us thinking. Meyer in fact asserts that energy, in
addition to being indestructible, is also able to change form. This implies
that we can not necessarily think in terms of unidirectional mutability, a
concept which thermodynamics has however maintained since the inception of its
famous "laws".
now I see nothing new here.. My definition of long ago was "energy can niether
be created nor destroyed, it can only be converted from one form to
another...." Philip
Now the specific form of energy which is the subject of thermodynamics is heat.
..........
----- Original Message -----
From: philip madsen
To: geocentrism list
Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2007 10:09 AM
Subject: [geocentrism] Fw: Thermoenergetics: Can Hydraulics Reverse Entropy?
Something to relax and play with.. Philip.
----- Original Message -----
From: josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: recipient list not shown:
Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2007 2:36 AM
Subject: Thermoenergetics: Can Hydraulics Reverse Entropy?
Sepp Hasslberger Update: Thermoenergetics: Can Hydraulics Reverse Entropy?
2007.11.24 17:36:07
http://blog.hasslberger.com/2007/11/thermoenergetics_can_hydraulic.html
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The idea of entropy, of the constant and irreversible winding
down of the universe, was introduced with the second law of
thermodynamics. This law is based on an observation of James
Watt's steam machine, which was the only technological
utilization of thermal energy available at the time. According
to the current views of thermodynamics, there is no antidote to
entropy. Once expended, energy is said to be lost forever in
that giant heat sink, which we imagine the vast reaches of the
universe to be. One of the great minds of this century, an
outsider to established science, has recognized the folly of
this view and coined a term for the antidote. He calls it
syntropy. In his book Cosmography, R. Buckminster Fuller writes: "The
reader will discover that the inexorable course of the gradual running down of
the energy of the universe - that is, entropy - is only part of the picture.
Entropy has a complementary phase, which we designated syntropy".
I wrote these words and quoted Fuller in 1993, in an article titled A New
Beginning For Thermodynamics. ( I think a read of this link first is advised
Philip) At the time, I had my share of opposition, together with some
appreciative comments. But few physicists seemed ready to question the
unconditional validity of the second law of thermodynamics at the time. It was
and perhaps still is one of the untouchable principles - almost a holy cow of
physics.
Now, a decade and a half later, it seems that some researchers have hit upon
a way to circumvent the law, to reverse that inexorable tendency of heat to
disperse from a warm place to a cooler one.
Ammonia Butane Ambient Heat Motor - David Matos de Matos.
...
------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://blog.hasslberger.com/2007/11/thermoenergetics_can_hydraulic.html
--
Powered by Movable Type
Version 3.2
http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.4/1147 - Release Date: 23/11/2007
9:19 AM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.6/1150 - Release Date: 24/11/2007
5:58 PM
Other related posts:
