Regner T Thanks for that -- I'm relieved that I don't have to re-educate myself! I'll sneak a side comment in here -- impressive graphics Ani.1 and Ani.2. Also comforting -- again I don't have to relearn anything! How long can this streak of good fortune continue? Paul D ----- Original Message ---- From: Regner Trampedach <art@xxxxxxxxxx> To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Wednesday, 21 November, 2007 10:07:57 PM Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Erratum: Great circles As Paul Deema pointed out below, I have used the term "great circles" for something different. I stay corrected. Thanks, Paul for telling me. Any longitude circles, e.g., the meridian, and the equator are all great circles. I have used the term in a few recent posts, and it should just be substituted for "circles of constant latitude", w.r.t. what-ever axis I am talking about there. It doesn't affect my arguments or conclusions, but the correction hopefully makes those clearer. Regards, Regner - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Quoting Paul Deema <paul_deema@xxxxxxxxxxx>: > Regner T > > Thank you for that but it still leaves me with a problem. Here is the > definition I'm working with - > http://www.phys-astro.sonoma.edu/courses/a231/some_definitions.html > Great Circle -- a circle on the surface of a sphere (thus on the surface of > the earth or the celestial sphere) which is formed as the result of the > inter-section of the sphere and a plane passing through the center of the > sphere. > Since a circle of constant latitude does not pass through the centre of the > sphere (except for the equator) there is a problem of definition here > somewhere. > Paul D > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Regner Trampedach <art@xxxxxxxxxx> > To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Sent: Wednesday, 21 November, 2007 12:27:31 AM > Subject: [geocentrism] Re: 2 Axes of rotation - drawing brand new for you > > Paul, > Your question is not pedantic, and having the terminology correct and > understood is crucial for any discussion. Thanks for asking. > "great circles around the celestial poles" means exactly what you suggest: > "parallels of celestial latitude" = "circles of constant celestial latitude". > These are the same as the nightly star-trails. > > Regards, > > Regner > > P.S. Sorry about the link, it should have been: > //www.freelists.org/archives/geocentrism/11-2007/pnglDPGTqO13P.png > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Quoting Paul Deema <paul_deema@xxxxxxxxxxx>: > > > Regner T > > I assure you that I am not being a pedant but I have to raise another point > > with you. It concerns this para - > > It is also clear that if the camera is mounted at another angle (still > > fixed) the camera will point at great circles around the celestial poles, > > both during the day and during the year (taking pictures every [tropical] > > solar day). > > > > I have a problem with your usage of 'great circles'. Do you mean 'parallels > > of celestial latitude'? As I say, pedantry for its own sake, is petty. I > ask > > because my knowledge is -- in the great scheme of things -- sketchy, and > when > > confronted with something which conflicts with that present knowledge, I > > suffer the symptoms of analogously having the ground move under my feet. So > > basically -- do I have to learn something new? > > Paul D > > PS I didn't have the password for vateco! > > > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > > From: Regner Trampedach <art@xxxxxxxxxx> > > To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Sent: Tuesday, 20 November, 2007 3:49:17 PM > > Subject: [geocentrism] Re: 2 Axes of rotation - drawing brand new for you > ..... > http://vatceo.phys.au.dk/horde/imp/message.php?index=7668 > ..... > > Regner > > > Make the switch to the world's best email. Get the new Yahoo!7 Mail > now. www.yahoo7.com.au/worldsbestemail > > Make the switch to the world's best email. Get the new Yahoo!7 Mail now. www.yahoo7.com.au/worldsbestemail