Any other response ideas? bb
Statement/Question:
"What a crock of unbelievable horse **** Bernie.
Worthy of no comment, other than this comment should have been editted (as above) before posting.
If you had any scientific education at all you would neither read nor send such uneducated drivel.
Your correspondent does not understand the term, "scientific."
First - the Bible is completely unsubstantaited - you might
as well quote the King Arthur legends. Second - it's totally irrelevant whether the Earth is seen as moving or fixed. The only thing that matters is the RELATIVE motion of one body against another - that's what Einstein is all about.
Einstein assumed the World to be orbiting the Sun; he did not in any way, shape or form prove it to be doing so.
The importance of the Copernican model is that it makes the mathematics way simpler.
Your correspondent clearly does not understand the mathematics involved in either system, or s/he would not make a statement that it contrary to the truth.
A "fixed Earth - moving universe" model is totally unworkable mathematically.
Nope.
There is great elegance in the Earth revolving around the sun solution. But it doesn't matter - they both move in the same way relative to each other regardless of your point of view. If you were on the Sun you would see the Earth
revolving around the sun.
To say the Earth is fixed and the sun revolves around it is as ridiculous as saying the moon is fixed and the earth revolves around it. In relative terms that is another solution but very complex and inelegant.
Please don't send me this psycho babble voodoo science anymore - it really ****** me off."
Funny how so many adopt this knee-jerk reaction to things that they do not comprehend, but which they inherently dislike. If s/he wants to debate it (and teach us how daft we all are here), then I hereby invite this person to join our humble forum.
Neville.
signed ***
Answer:
"Only when we hit a nerve, does this kind of emotional reaction come forth. You've challenged his religious Idol, that is, false science.
First - substitute "evolution science" for "Bible" and finish the sentence.
Second - "irrelevant"?! He knows how relevant it would be if the Earth is shown to be stationary after centuries of theoretical science (oxymoron) has assumed the issue settled and then that Einstein buried the issue forever with his juvenile "thought experiments" about "relativity".
Heliocentricity makes the math simpler?! What a joke! Whole new "reconstructed mathematics and physics" have to
be created for each of the seven observation-denying assumptions that are built into the Pharisee Religion's Kabbalic universe...which he thinks is not in the picture at all, and everything involved on his side is altruistic "secular science". He is in for a big surprise. May God grant him the grace to change when the time comes when that option will be given to the whole world."
********
Shape Yahoo! in your own image.
Join our Network Research Panel today!
