-
Hi Steve, I got the blast, and understood it and what was going on. No problem here. But as a fellow tech geek, I do need to run a peer review on your logic. Spammers are getting more creative. The folks that sell lists get a premium for "real" email addresses rather than stale or ones orphaned because of changing providers etc. So they took to the practice of using the list to send junk. If they didn't get a reject like you, they knew it was a good address and could get a premium for a list that was made up of "good" addresses. This was a pain, but it was not a killer. The killer comes from those who mask the origin of the email. These people send an email to an address that they know is bad, but they put the real recipient in the "Reply-To" header in the email, so when the bad address reject message comes with the original message as an attachment, they are delivering it to the party they originally intended, making it look like they had sent the original message anyway. Thus they get past some spam filters, and also increase the chances of the email being opened because they think that there was something wrong with something they actually sent. Because of this, many email administrators have turned off the option that sends "bad recipient" messages so their servers are not unwittingly becoming spam distribution centers. So not getting a reject no longer means that the address is good. It just means that the another aspect of the courteous world of yore has been corrupted by spammers. I do thank you for the notice you did send. I wish I could have attended. Mike Steve Bromley wrote: **************************************** For List Info or To make _ANY_ changes, including unsubscribing from this list, click -----> //www.freelists.org/list/geocaching Missouri Caches Scheduled to be Archived http://tinyurl.com/87cqw |