Read anything these guys have written! RiceCrispie007 http://www.geocaching.com/profile/?guid=b4fd8ee0-25ef-4005-ac56-68e18bd98722&wid=dce77ae4-7669-4552-8adf-01d52f84a823&ds=2 ________________________________ From: Glenn <potbellystove@xxxxxxxxx> To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Saturday, September 12, 2009 8:57:47 PM Subject: [GeoStL] Re: FW: Plane (or plain) crash cache I cant spel with a licke , and my gramemmer is not so good too. At least HE is a friendly fellow. On Sep 12, 2009, at 8:12 PM, Michael Griffin wrote: I have met him and he is a super nice guy. I don't think there is anything we should take from this other than he has no spell checker or not grammatically correct. I don't think he thought it through. He just needs a little guidance and some friendly advice. > > >-------------------------- >Mike Griffin >314-569-7428 ESN: 281 >636-485-9998 (Cell) > >Sent using my BlackBerry Wireless Device. >Typos are entirely possible! > >----- Original Message ----- >From: geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >Sent: Sat Sep 12 20:08:21 2009 >Subject: [GeoStL] Re: FW: Plane (or plain) crash cache > >- >Personally, bad grammar isn't a reason to SBA a cache. I've seen worse >on caches with dozens of finds. Some of these caches were by SLAGA >members *gasp*! > >Let's face it, some of us aren't as educated as others. Just because >you can't type doesn't mean you can't have fun geocaching. > >As far as the cache page content, I agree with the others in that the >cache page is distasteful. However, throwing the guy on gallows is a >bit harsh, in my opinion. > >Andrew Senger >asenger@xxxxxxxxx >http://www.yawetag.net >"In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king. He's also >postmaster and probably traffic cop, too. All the jobs for sports >referees are probably filled, though." --Lemel Hebert-Williams > > > >On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 4:27 PM, CribbageWitch <VelyneTarlos@xxxxxxxxxxx> >wrote: >> - >> I voted for an archive for more than just the disrespectfulness of the cache >> placer. 1) The page showed no respect to the pilot, his family, or other >> people who may have known the fellow. 2) The page was poorly written. 3) >> The cache page did not mention permission to place the cache. 4) >> We have been spoiled by *gln and RotC in making sure that cache pages are >> complete and respectful before publishing. My vote for archive was 50% for >> the placer's mistakes and 50% for Reviewer Jones' poor judgment by >> publishing this cache page without question. >> >> I will climb down off my soapbox now and go fix dinner. > > > **************************************** > For List Info or To make _ANY_ changes to your account, including > unsubscribing from this >list, click -----> //www.freelists.org/list/geocaching > Missouri Caches Scheduled to be Archived http://tinyurl.com/87cqw > Missouri Geocaching land use policies --> www.MoCache.net > MoGeo Forums -->http://mogeo.ipbhost.com/index.php > > Glenn