[GeoStL] New cache approval requirements?
- From: Dan Henke <thunder_monk@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocaching <geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 14:31:03 -0700 (PDT)
-
Glenn,
What is this about having all legs of a multi cache
approved before that multi will be approved?
I think the vast majority of cachers are responsible
enough to make the cache safe and in the correct way
for the finders to have a good time and be safe. If
that is the case I think that multi cache placement
will start going down as it is too much of a hassle in
order to get them approved. I have been working on a 4
step multi with branches going nowhere if you choose
the wrong answer. I would have to give 8 to 9 sets of
coordinates to you and then wait for this thing to be
approved. It would not be worth it. Just my opinion
but I think this cache approval process is starting to
get way out of hand and going way overboard for a
simple game.
IMHO of course
Dan (Thunder)
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com
****************************************************************************
Our WebPage! Http://WWW.GeoStL.com
Mail List Info. //www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/list?list_id=geocaching
Mail List FAQ's: //www.freelists.org/help/questions.html
****************************************************************************
To unsubscribe from this list:
send an email to geocaching-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the
Subject field
Other related posts:
