[gameprogrammer] Re: Not quite related to programming, but worth a look
- From: Robbert de Groot <zekaric@xxxxxxxx>
- To: gameprogrammer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 13:13:58 -0400 (EDT)
Now I regret having responded in the first place. Sorry all.
> David Cornell schrieb:
> > go ...
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
---------------------
To unsubscribe go to http://gameprogrammer.com/mailinglist.html
Other related posts:
- » [gameprogrammer] Not quite related to programming, but worth a look
- » [gameprogrammer] Re: Not quite related to programming, but worth a look
- » [gameprogrammer] Re: Not quite related to programming, but worth a look
- » [gameprogrammer] Re: Not quite related to programming, but worth a look
- » [gameprogrammer] Re: Not quite related to programming, but worth a look
- » [gameprogrammer] Re: Not quite related to programming, but worth a look
- » [gameprogrammer] Re: Not quite related to programming, but worth a look
- » [gameprogrammer] Re: Not quite related to programming, but worth a look
- » [gameprogrammer] Re: Not quite related to programming, but worth a look
- » [gameprogrammer] Re: Not quite related to programming, but worth a look
- » [gameprogrammer] Re: Not quite related to programming, but worth a look
- » [gameprogrammer] Re: Not quite related to programming, but worth a look
- » [gameprogrammer] Re: Not quite related to programming, but worth a look
- » [gameprogrammer] Re: Not quite related to programming, but worth a look
- » [gameprogrammer] Re: Not quite related to programming, but worth a look
- » [gameprogrammer] Re: Not quite related to programming, but worth a look
- » [gameprogrammer] Re: Not quite related to programming, but worth a look
- » [gameprogrammer] Re: Not quite related to programming, but worth a look
- » [gameprogrammer] Re: Not quite related to programming, but worth a look
- » [gameprogrammer] Re: Not quite related to programming, but worth a look