Dagens FSV-oversigt: Quality check: does it matter for quality how you organize and pay for health care? A review of the international evidence.

  • From: Folkesundhedsvidenskabelige forskningsoversigter <liste@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: fsvoversigter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2015 11:15:32 -0000

Du modtager denne e-mail, fordi du abonnerer på servicen 
'Folkesundhedsvidenskabelige forskningsoversigter'. 

------------- Seneste opslag -------------

Dagens #fsvoversigt:

Quality check: does it matter for quality how you organize and pay for health 
care? A review of the international evidence.

Int J Health Serv. 2014;44(3):479-505

Authors: Footman K, Garthwaite K, Bambra C, McKee M

Abstract

Health systems in high-income countries have experienced significant 
organizational and financial reforms over the last 25 years. The implications 
of these changes for the effectiveness of health care systems need to be 
examined, particularly in relation to their effects on the quality of health 
services (a pertinent issue in the United Kingdom in light of the Francis 
Report). Systematic review methodology was used to locate and evaluate 
published systematic reviews of quantitative intervention studies (experimental 
and observational) on the effects of health system organizational and financial 
reforms (system financing, funding allocations, direct purchasing arrangements, 
organization of service provision, and service integration) on quality of care 
in high-income countries. Nineteen systematic reviews were identified. The 
evidence on the payment of providers and purchaser-provider splits was 
inconclusive. In contrast, there is some evidence that greater integration of 
servi
 ces can benefit patients. There were no relevant studies located relating to 
funding allocation reforms or direct purchasing arrangements. The systematic 
review-level evidence base suggests that the privatization and marketization of 
health care systems does not improve quality, with most financial and 
organizational reforms having either inconclusive or negative effects.

PMID: 25618986 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

----------------------------------------------
Dette abstract er hentet via PubMed fra National Library of Medicine, USA 
(http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/About/disclaimer.html).
----------------------------------------------

Læs mere om folkesundhedsvidenskabelige forskningsoversigter, adgang til 
artikler, kvalitetsvurdering og folkenene bag servicen på 
http://www.fsvoversigter.dk

'Synes godt om', kommenter og del gerne dette opslag i dit netværk.

Du kan finde opslaget på Facebook: 
https://www.facebook.com/174518596068428/posts/356177464569206

----------------------------------------------

Se abstractet i PubMed: http://evidens.link/1GsT0CG

Ikonerne under 'Full text links' i øverste højre hjørne (i standardudgaven af 
PubMed) viser, om du har online-adgang til hele artiklen. Du kan læse mere om 
adgang til artikler på http://www.fsvoversigter.dk.
 
----------------------------------------------

Hvis du ikke længere ønsker at modtage disse opdateringer om nye opslag fra 
servicen 'Folkesundhedsvidenskabelige forskningsoversigter', skal du gå ind på 
http://www.fsvoversigter.dk/e-mail. 

Samme sted kan du vælge at modtage et 'digest', hvis du ikke ønsker at modtage 
en e-mail på alle hverdage.

----------------------------------------------

Mange hilsner

Folkene bag servicen 'Folkesundhedsvidenskabelige forskningsoversigter'
(http://www.fsvoversigter.dk)
 

Other related posts:

  • » Dagens FSV-oversigt: Quality check: does it matter for quality how you organize and pay for health care? A review of the international evidence. - Folkesundhedsvidenskabelige forskningsoversigter