Again, my point is to stick to the libre software aspects of politics
and let other of our personal ideologies aside, the political side of
libre software is whide enough to let other areas of economic function
and social organization aside, so again, I think is better if we stick
to these kind of politics, I think we agree about libre software in the
way Stallman though it, better stick to this instead of trying to make
our entire ideologies part of the FSForce like the dam social justice
cringers do.
I disagree. Insulating the cause from politics is what they are counting
on. They using terms in a political sense and if they are not countered
they will be redefined to the point you will not be able to speak
without it being 'political'.
On 2019-10-04 5:36 p.m., taraak wrote:
"Marxism", "anarchist pamphlet", etc, lets stick to the libre software
issue and keep the rest of our political ideas to ourselves and other
groups, this is not the place.
On 10/4/19 6:36 PM, Jake D. Parsons wrote:
How was this not relevant?
On Thursday, October 3, 2019 7:09:42 P.M. EDT taraak wrote:
Pufffff... can we stick inside this list to the politics related to
libre software and let the rest for our personal life and own work?
On 10/3/19 4:01 PM, Jake D. Parsons wrote:
I wish people when they talked about slavery and feudalism actually did
not parrot modern professors who have a hidden political agenda. I
stopped reading after that, and stopped reading seriously after "white
terrorism". It was like reading some junk anarchist pamphlet.
I doubt government had much of a hand in this, this is from the Marxist
world as a front and very probably instigated by corporations who are
riding the wave of the black chick that ignited it. Who herself proved a
stereotype which is ironic.
On Thursday, October 3, 2019 3:45:04 A.M. EDT Jagadees wrote:
There are lot of thing we miss participating the discussion on
punishment of Stallman
https://neritam.wordpress.com/2019/10/01/things-we-miss-while-punishing-richard-stallman/
regards,
Jagadees.
