Re: [foxboro] supervisory setpoint control

  • From: "Johnson, Alex P (IOM)" <Alex.Johnson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 16:54:47 -0500

The Supervisory Setpoint Control is described in B0193RY.

The ACK bit is part of the status word associated with the SUP_IN OM variable 
(block parameter). OM Variables, including block parameters, have two or three 
parts depending on I/A Series version:

Value
Status
Time Tag (V8.x and later only)

The status part (word) of the SUP_IN parameter includes the ACK bit.


You can only change the ACK bit using a program that calls the correct AIM*API, 
FoxAPI, or OM API routine. The ACK bit cannot be changed by a Sequence block or 
omset/omsetimp.


In Version 8.4, the system was change to allow one to change SUP_IN without 
requiring the use of the ACK bit by offering new SUPOPT parameters.


So, to change the SUP_IN parameter from a computer program you must do one of 
the following:

1) Be a V8.4 for all CPs (100% CP270) used by the computer program in which 
case the ACK bit can be ignored
2) If you have CPs that must work with the computer program and which are not 
at V8.4, you need one of the 
   Following:
   a) AIM*OPC DA Server plus SSCSupport
   b) I/A-Connect

The AIM*OPC DA Server and SSCSupport can be found in BuyAutomation.com:
        Q0303AE SSCSupport for Windows
        Q0301UT AIM*AT OPC Server - Data Access For 1 Server

The I/A Connect product from our German operation combines the OPC DA Server 
and the SSCSupport functionality into one package. If you want information on 
it, have your IOM Client Sales Executive (account representative) contact 
Hermann Draeger at Hermann.draeger@xxxxxxxxxxxx


I don't have a strong opinion on whether one is better than the other.


The "best" solution is to upgrade though that is generally not possible.


Regards,
 
Alex Johnson
Invensys Operations Management
10900 Equity Drive
Houston, TX 77041
+1 713 329 8472 (desk)
+1 713 329 1600 (operator)
+1 713 329 1944 (SSC Fax)
+1 713 329 1700 (Central Fax)
alex.johnson@xxxxxxxxxxxx (current)
alex.johnson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (good until September 2010)


Attend OpsManage'10
Real Collaboration. Real-Time Results.

Click Here to learn more about these events and to register.




-----Original Message-----
From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Paulsen, Annukka
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 2:46 PM
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [foxboro] supervisory setpoint control

Anyone out there who knows how to set the ".ACK" bit associated with SUP_IN  in 
a supervisory control setpoint configuration?   Specifically what is the 
parameter you can set, or is it embedded in the SUP_IN parameter and not 
settable otherwise?
We are upgrading a third party advanced control that will write setpoints over 
OPC. I know I can do this using a calc block that writes to RSP, but seems that 
I should be able to do this much neater by writing to SUP_IN, but without the 
".ack" bit set the control block is enabled but not in supervisory control.
Annukka Paulsen
KapStone Charleston Kraft

________________________________
The information contained in this message and any attached files may be 
privileged and/or confidential and protected from disclosure. If you are not 
the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of any of 
the information contained in or attached to this transmission is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please so notify 
the sender immediately without reading it. Also, please promptly destroy the 
original transmission and its attachments. Any views or opinions presented in 
this message or attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation or its subsidiaries.

 
 
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
 
foxboro mailing list:             //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
 


*** Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, including any associated or attached 
files, is intended solely for the individual or entity to which it is 
addressed. This e-mail is confidential and may well also be legally privileged. 
If you have received it in error, you are on notice of its status. Please 
notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message from 
your system. Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes, or disclose its 
contents to any other person. This email comes from a division of the Invensys 
Group, owned by Invensys plc, which is a company registered in England and 
Wales with its registered office at 3rd Floor, 40 Grosvenor Place, London, SW1X 
7AW (Registered number 166023). For a list of European legal entities within 
the Invensys Group, please go to 
http://www.invensys.com/legal/default.asp?top_nav_id=77&nav_id=80&prev_id=77.

You may contact Invensys plc on +44 (0)20 3155 1200 or e-mail 
reception@xxxxxxxxxxxxx This e-mail and any attachments thereto may be subject 
to the terms of any agreements between Invensys (and/or its subsidiaries and 
affiliates) and the recipient (and/or its subsidiaries and affiliates).


 
 
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
 
foxboro mailing list:             //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
 

Other related posts: