Re: [foxboro] rmount fails
- From: David Johnson <drjohn@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 10:03:44 -0600
Hey Jeremy.
I thought that rmount throttled back the amount of traffic put on the
nodebus, whereas rcp doesn't. Remember I work a lot of places and
not everyone had the foresight, intelligence, or money that it took
to put second ethernet cards in all the Sun boxes. So we play the
hand we are dealt.
David
At 09:50 AM 1/24/2007, you wrote:
>On 1/24/07, David Johnson <drjohn@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > We just copied some displays from an AW51 to a WP51 with a typical
> > "blow" script, then 5 minutes later the same script failed.
> > Upon investigation we found that the rmount to that WP failed. When
> > we try to rmount it, nothing happens.
>
>change the blow script to use rcp instead or rmount. rmount is nasty.
>
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
>Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
>your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
>
>foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
>to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
>to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
>
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
Other related posts:
