Re: [foxboro] rcopy, rmount on AW51D very slow

  • From: Tom Vandewater <tjvandew@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 19:00:32 -0800

Dave,
    I remember this happening on the Sun boxes before. We never figured out why 
but I can almost guarantee that rebooting 04AW01 will solve the problem. If you 
let Duc know you are going to reboot it he will probably come in free of charge 
because he wants the Sun boxes to run forever. It pains him so to reset the 
uptime counter to 0 days;<). He also knows that the NVRAM battery may be dead 
and the box may not be able to reboot. That creates an even more serious issue 
that will probably result in you paying Duc whatever price he demands;<)

Tom VandeWater
Control Conversions, Inc. 

> On Feb 12, 2014, at 1:06 PM, Duc M Do <duc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> My answering the phone at Duc's Technical Support will cost you 3.99 a
> minute.
> Duc
> 
> 
>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 11:01 AM, <dave.caldwell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>> All Knowing List,
>> 
>> I have an AW51D(04AW01) that is extremely slow to rmount from any another
>> AW (or to respond to commands across the remote connection once rmounted).
>> The rmount takes about 5 minutes, as does the ls -l, cp, etc...
>> 
>> I can rmount other AW file systems to 04AW01 no problem-- just very slow
>> when others rmount 04AW01.
>> 
>> Ping, telnet, diplays, icc, etc. are all good.
>> 
>> I checked disk usage on the AW in question and it looked good.
>> 
>> I noticed many processes belonging to /usr/fox/exten/urfs_xserver -m
>> /etc/fox/dsamap and one for urfs_om_daemon.
>> My limited understanding is that these processes govern the remote file
>> system.
>> I did not attempt to kill or restart any processes, but was tempted.
>> 
>> Lastly, I'd like to do as my friend Duc suggests and avoid rebooting this
>> box (answer your phone Duc).
>> 
>> Any ideas???
>> Thanks,
>> Dave
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________________________________
> This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
> Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
> your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
> 
> foxboro mailing list:             //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
> to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
> to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
> 
 
 
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
 
foxboro mailing list:             //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. foxboro
  3. Archive
  4. 02-2014