Re: [foxboro] Some things to talk about

  • From: James B Koenig <james.koenig@xxxxxxxx>
  • To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 12:12:36 -0500

I agree with Chuck and the others, but don't limit it to a Delay ON -
include a Delay OFF.

I could use a difference alarm in a SWCH block to know when my flows, temps
or levels start separating.
This would keep me from having to build a REALM block to do this and then
have to modify the faceplate to remove the SPT and replace it with the flow
ID.


James B Koenig
Sr. Production Tech / DCS Specialist
BASF Corporation





                                                                           
                         "Jones,                                           
                         Charles                                           
                         R.                                             To 
                         (Chuck)"         <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>          
                         <Chuck.J                                       cc 
                         ones@tat                                          
                         eandlyle                                  Subject 
                         .com>            Re: [foxboro] Some things to     
                         Sent by:         talk about                       
                         foxboro-                                          
                         bounce@f                                          
                         reelists                                          
                         .org                                              
                                                                           
                                                                           
                         07/24/20                                          
                         08 11:15                                          
                         AM                                                
                                                                           
                                                                           
                          Please                                           
                         respond                                           
                            to                                             
                         foxboro@                                          
                         freelist                                          
                          s.org                                            
                                                                           
                                                                           




Like Corey, I (often) use LOGIC blocks for their inexpensive alarm delay
capability (to filter out spikes).  I sometimes use them for creating
interlocks where I need to OR or AND some inputs.  If LOGIC blocks go
away, I can use a MON block for the same function.  For alarm delays, I
could still use the larger CALC or CALCA. =20

I think we should keep LOGIC blocks.  Or, better yet, build a Delay ON
function into our existing alarms.

Chuck Jones
Automation Technologist
Tate & Lyle South Plant



***************************************************************************=

*****************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
=
solely for the=20
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not
=
the intended=20
recipient or the person responsible for delivering the email to the
intende=
d recipient, be=20
advised that you have received this email in error that any use,
disseminat=
ion,=20
forwarding, printing, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited.  If
=
you have received=20
this email in error please notify the sender immediately. Please note that
=
we reserve=20
the right to monitor and read any emails sent and received by the Company
i=
n=20
accordance with and to the extent permitted by applicable legal rules.

Tate & Lyle PLC, registered in England: number 76535. Registered office:
Ta=
te & Lyle PLC, Sugar Quay,
Lower Thames Street, London EC3R 6DQ.=20

Tate & Lyle Industries Limited registered in England:number 699090.
Registered office: Tate & Lyle Industries Limited, Sugar Quay, Lower
Thames=
 Street,
London EC3R 6DQ
***************************************************************************=

******************************



_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html

foxboro mailing list:             //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave



 
 
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
 
foxboro mailing list:             //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
 

Other related posts: