Per the FCP270 PSS 0 - 60 C. So your heater likely keeps you above freezing but depending on where you are located and sunlight on the cabinet, 60 C might be a problem. You'll also have to review the PSS's for all other devices in the cabinet. Terry > Subject: Re: [foxboro] Non-FT FCP and IO in Local Control Panel > To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > From: tjvandew@xxxxxxxxx > Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 19:13:34 +0000 > > Dave, > I am sitting in the waiting room at the hospital waiting for Kristen to > bring my 5th grandson into the world so I have some time to kill. Duc, we > are at Baptist East. (First time anybody has posted that on the list I > bet;<). > I'm not positive but I think the FCP has a lower temperature threshold > than the 200 series FBM's. We thought about putting both in the field when I > was in HI. I'm sure having the FBM's in the compressor cabinet would be > fine. We never had much trouble with the 100 series FBM's out in C-10 but I > personally liked having them all in the E/I rooms. That was our final > decision in HI. In that way you have one place to go to see the status of > FCP and FBM's and don't have the fieldbus strung out. (With fiber FB rather > than copper that isn't as big of a concern though. Maybe I am old school but > I like the central "controlled environment" for CP's and FBM's. One mans > opinion. > I think I remember Wolfie scoping out replacing those PLC's a few years > before I retired. Are you going to use the modular sequences like in C-10? > If so I volunteer to do the application work and graphics;<). When I finish > this job........... > Cheers, > Tom > Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry > -----Original Message----- > From: <dave.caldwell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sender: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 14:09:46 > To: <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Reply-To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [foxboro] Non-FT FCP and IO in Local Control Panel > > Hello List, > I am replacing an aging AB PLC-2 used for compressor control. The PLC is > located in a purged cabinet in the field with a heater only (no cooling). > > Thought was to replace the non-fault tolerant PLC-2 processor with an FCP270 > non-fault tolerant. Also, to replace the PLC IO with a baseplate of 200 > series. Finally, use fiber to get back to the MESH switch. > > Anyone had problems with non-fault tolerant FCP270? Anyone ran into issues of > FCP270 or 200 series IO being exposed to ambient temperature swings? > > Also considered moving the CP only, or both CP and IO back to the conditioned > space, but each has advantages/disadvantages. Any thoughts? > > Thanks, > Dave > > > > > > _______________________________________________________________________ > This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process > Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at > your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html > > foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro > to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join > to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave > > > > _______________________________________________________________________ > This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process > Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at > your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html > > foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro > to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join > to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave > _______________________________________________________________________ This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave