Re: [foxboro] I/A 7.0 Configuration

From: tom.vandewater@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 11:01:02 -0500
Yazid,
        You are right in saying you won't need DNBI's and DNBT's for the XP
stations but I "think" you will still need a new RCNI for each of those
stations.  Many stations can be connected through their individual RCNI's to
a hub that can be connected to a single NCNI.  This is true unless Foxobro
has decided that the letterbug can be manually defined in the workstation by
the user and doesn't need a physical letterbug which they currently use to
insure uniqueness on the bus.  If they allow that, I think all DNBI's,
DNBT's, and RCNI's could be eliminated, but only on non-redundant control
network configurations.  
        These are only my thoughts and are in no way meant to be factual.  I
would get with Foxboro to find out what their intent is.  Even though we
currently use redundant networks exclusively, I would be interested to know
the answer to your question.

Tom VandeWater
Control Systems Developer/Analyst
Dow Corning Corp.
Carrollton, KY USA


-----Original Message-----
From: yazid [mailto:yazid@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 4:33 AM
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [foxboro] I/A 7.0 Configuration


Hi there,

We are planning to configure I/A 7.0 system with mix of Ver 7.0 and 6.4 (XP
& NT). There will be 3 stations on I/A 7.0 and 1 station on I/A 6.4. It will
be using non-redundant Control Network configuration. Based on B0193AC
document, there was no splitter cable used at all. Is that only apply to I/A
7.0 (XP) only or it apply to all the stations (XP and NT)?
Earlier, I saw a document stating that if you have I/A 7.0 running, you'll
use NCNI and you can throw away all the DNBIs and DNBTs. Is this correct?
Based on the documents, there will always be two versions of I/A 7.0 Day0 CD
(redundant and non-redundant).

Thank you.
Yazid

 
 
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
 
foxboro mailing list:             //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
 

________________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working
around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com
________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working
around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com
________________________________________________________________________
 
 
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
 
foxboro mailing list:             //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
Re: [foxboro] I/A 7.0 Configuration

Other related posts:
