Re: [foxboro] Alarm Priorities
- From: "Mansfield, Ben" <bmansfie@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "'foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 09:22:06 -0400
Typically customers choose to implement something like:
Priority 1 - Safety or emergency alarms (e-stop, etc.)
Priority 2 - Alarms indicating loss of product or product quality
Priority 3 - Alarms that may lead to loss of product or product quality
Priority 4 - General alarms
Priority 5 - Information-only alarms (i.e. accumulator target reached, etc.)
Hope this helps
Ben
-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Elwart [mailto:steve.elwart@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 8:26 PM
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [foxboro] Alarm Priorities
We are in the process of taking another look at our alarm priorities.
What is the experience out there with priorities? What have you set up as
the levels? What do each mean?
thanks!
Steven P. Elwart, P.E
Director of Systems Engineering
Ergon Refining, Inc.
2611 Haining Road
Vicksburg, MS 39180-0309
601-638-4960 (O)
601-630-8311 (FAX)
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
Other related posts:
