Hello Gang, I have a bit of an issue with API calls and in particular the one offs li= ke uread and uwrite. They are extensively used within our 'C' applications to get the odd few = values to and from control blocks. A logfile snippet: ------- 15/05/2005:12:52:30 - nextladle : CBP:C1SETUP:NEXT_LADLE.IO0002, ValType:= 6, Error:1=20 15/05/2005:12:52:30 - nextladle : CBP:C1SETUP:NEXT_LADLE.RI0001, ValType:= 3, Error:1=20 15/05/2005:12:52:30 - nextladle : CBP:C1SETUP:NEXT_LADLE.RI0002, ValType:= 3, Error:1 15/05/2005:12:52:35 - nextladle : CBP:C1SETUP:CAST_LADLE.SN0008. Error: 3= 4=20 15/05/2005:12:52:39 - nextladle : CBP:C1SETUP:CAST_LADLE.SN0003. Error: 3= 4=20 ------- Error 1, according to foxdoc B0193UD appendix D, means: 1 noaccs Unable to access object (object-level error). Object not found; check "name" argument of FoxAPI call for typographical=20 error; check I/A Series database for existence of object and create, if necessary. Error 34, according to foxdoc B0193UD appendix D, means: 34 nostg String not found. Object(s) not found; check "name" argument of sread() for typographical error; check I/A Series database for existence of object and create it, if necessary. But the objects do exist and the program only fails like 2-3 times a day = while it runs well over 150 times a day. And if the program then tries to write back to I/A about the issue it get= s yet another error: 15/05/2005:12:52:43 - nextladle : CBP:C1SETUP:COMMON.II0001, ValType:6, E= rror:-35=20 15/05/2005:12:52:43 - nextladle : CBP:C1SETUP:COMMON.II0002, ValType:6, E= rror:-35=20 Error -35, according to foxdoc B0193UD appendix D, means: ENOTACTIVE (-35) Caller not active with IPC. My question really is, why are API calls so unreliable.=20 Some years ago all programs got changed from OM calls to API calls and ev= er since I have this issue with reliablility. The host is running V7.1 with Fox API Version 4.2.8. Regards, Frits Schouten=20 Process Computing Department=20 New Zealand Steel Ltd EOM=0A=0ANOTICE - This message and any attached files may contain informa= tion that is confidential and/or subject of legal privilege intended only= for use by the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient= or the person responsible for delivering the message to the intended rec= ipient, be advised that you have received this message in error and that = any dissemination, copying or use of this message or attachment is strict= ly forbidden, as is the disclosure of the information therein. If you hav= e received this message in error please notify the sender immediately and= delete the message. _______________________________________________________________________ This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave