If the goal is simply to restore individual emails, why not just use Deleted Item Retention? The user is not going to delete his mailbox... -----Original Message----- From: Dee [mailto:deea@xxxxxxxx] Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 1:09 PM To: [ExchangeList] Subject: [exchangelist] Slow Brick Level Backup http://www.MSExchange.org/ I understand that the Brightstor ArcServe (windows) Brick Level backup of each email box is extremely slow (taking 23 hours to perform a backup now). My boss insists we use this function and figure out a way to make it faster, as he wants to be able to restore individual emails for each employee. Any suggestions on an alternative? ------------------------------------------------------ List Archives: http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=exchangelist Exchange Newsletters: http://www.msexchange.org/pages/newsletter.asp Exchange FAQ: http://www.msexchange.org/pages/larticle.asp?type=FAQ ------------------------------------------------------ Other Internet Software Marketing Sites: World of Windows Networking: http://www.windowsnetworking.com Leading Network Software Directory: http://www.serverfiles.com No.1 ISA Server Resource Site: http://www.isaserver.org Windows Security Resource Site: http://www.windowsecurity.com/ Network Security Library: http://www.secinf.net/ Windows 2000/NT Fax Solutions: http://www.ntfaxfaq.com ------------------------------------------------------ You are currently subscribed to this MSEXchange.org Discussion List as: swillis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe visit http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=exchangelist Report abuse to listadmin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
