RE: E2K\AD Hirearchy Question.

  • From: "Koray ARIKAN" <koray.arikan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "'[ExchangeList]'" <exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 20:24:38 +0300

If anyone knows this, please answer. I have an missing account (The
account has been deleted) which has the explicit permissions and cannot
remove it from within the System Manager, because it is complaining that
this account permission has been inherited from an upper level, which I
couldn't find like Paul.

-----Original Message-----
From: paul_lemonidis@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:paul_lemonidis@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2003 8:08 PM
To: [ExchangeList]
Subject: [exchangelist] E2K\AD Hirearchy Question.

Hello all
I have a problem that I need help with please. Any help will be most
gratefully recieved.
What exactly is the logic behind the Exchange Organisation in E2K. I
have a user, who incidentally is also the person who installed AD and
subsequesntly E2K, and at every single hirearchy level in the Exchange
System Manager he shows a having his explicit permissions as inherited
from above. Problem is, what is above the Organsation level?????? I have
searched though and AD users and Groups and just everything I can think
of. I have even run up ADSI Edit and am totally stumped as to where
these permissions are being inherited from?
Am I missing something or is something awry?  After all it would seem to
me that top of Organisation should mean just that but apparently it
Many thanks in advance.
Paul Lemonidis.
List Archives:
Exchange Newsletters:
Exchange FAQ:
ISA Server Resource Site:
Windows Security Resource Site:
Windows 2000/NT Fax Solutions:
You are currently subscribed to this Discussion List as:
To unsubscribe send a blank email to

Other related posts: