RE: Database corruption after moving mailbox from 5.5 to 2003?
- From: "Jason Merrique" <j.merrique@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "[ExchangeList]" <exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 10:07:11 +0100
Hi Saleem,
Are you sure? I thought the Exchange Std limit was 16gb?
Jason
________________________________
From: saleem [mailto:sroumald@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 18 June 2004 16:49
To: [ExchangeList]
Subject: RE: [exchangelist] Database corruption after moving
mailbox from 5.5 to 2003?
Hello guys ,
I do not know which version of Exchange did you install , Is it
standard or enterprise , Check the *.edb size if it is near to 7GB you
are in trouble may be an upgrade to enterpise could a solution . I got
this problem before i upgrade it after now it is ok . also when you
moved from exchange 5.5 to exchange 2000/2003 make sure you have a lot
of space For example if you are moving 5gb of mail make sure in temp
folder you have more than 5GB or else you are in trouble
Saleem
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Battersby [mailto:tomb@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Fri 6/18/2004 12:28 PM
To: [ExchangeList]
Cc:
Subject: [exchangelist] Database corruption after moving
mailbox from 5.5 to 2003?
http://www.MSExchange.org/
We are currently moving from a single Exchange 5.5
server (NT4 SP6a BDC)
to a single 2003 standard edition server SP1 running on
windows 2003
server standard, with all SUS deployable patches
installed. We have got
the two servers running in the same site, replicating
etc. Our AD has
mainly 2000 SP4 domain controllers, and the exchange
server itself is a DC
(2003). The Active Directory connector is on the new
2003 server. We are
in AD mixed mode due to the legacy mail server.
We moved test mailboxes over OK, and I moved my own
mailbox (c.
45MB)without any problems. However, the last two
mailboxes that I moved
using the move mailbox wizard have caused the mail store
to report itself
corrupted (both were c. 80MB).
There is no loss of functionality in Outlook for the
moved user, the store
will mount and dismount OK, and the event log just says
that it moved the
mailbox. The wizard also says everything is fine when
you do the move.
However eseutil /g says 'Database is CORRUPTED!' and
backups of the
information store fail both with NTbackup and backup
exec 9 sp1 agent for
exchange. The first time I wasn't sure it was the
migration as i didn't
spot it straight away, but i have just moved another
box, running eseutil
/g immediately before and after the move. Before - OK.
After - corrupt.
BUT - if i run eseutil /d on the database, it completes
fine, and eseutil
/g subsequently reports all is well, ie it has fixed
itself.
And although the information store object can't be
backed up when it
reports as corrupt, i could still back up every mailbox
without any
problems.
The only errors I have got in the event log are related
to the system
attendant trying to access the store whilst it is
dismounted for defrag -
I have two 9175 and two 1005 errors.
Anybody seen this before, know how to avoid it or what?
Anybody know if it
is a real problem or not?
------------------------------------------------------
List Archives:
http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=exchangelist
Exchange Newsletters:
http://www.msexchange.org/pages/newsletter.asp
Exchange FAQ:
http://www.msexchange.org/pages/larticle.asp?type=FAQ
------------------------------------------------------
Other Internet Software Marketing Sites:
World of Windows Networking:
http://www.windowsnetworking.com
Leading Network Software Directory:
http://www.serverfiles.com
No.1 ISA Server Resource Site: http://www.isaserver.org
Windows Security Resource Site:
http://www.windowsecurity.com/
Network Security Library: http://www.secinf.net/
Windows 2000/NT Fax Solutions: http://www.ntfaxfaq.com
------------------------------------------------------
You are currently subscribed to this MSEXchange.org
Discussion List as: sroumald@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe visit
http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=exchangelist
Other related posts:
