----- Original Message ----- From: "Motti" <motti46@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [etni] orals I for one agree with your tester "our well prepared students were very upset." is actually a euphemism for students who memorised summaries they wrote at home. Does such a memorized speech tell us much about the communication skills of that pupil? I think not. When I hear such a memorized artificial speech I stop it after a few seconds. Mordechai Mendelkern Aviva wrote: > Today, at our "oral" exams we had a really nice tester - so nice in fact > that she wanted to give a grade for the project even if the students > hadn't written one- those who were just too lazy to do it. She said that > if they could speak about a subject why not give them credit for their > ability to speak for two minutes. Not only that - she says this is done > quite often! Why not help those students? When we insisted that the > maximum grade would be 40 (for the interview) she thought we were rather > strict! > Another tester refused to allow our girls to speak for 3 minutes about the > project and insisted only on asking questions. I showed her the rubric > however she said that she has tested this way for years and has no > intention to change now! Needless to say, our well prepared students were > very upset. > > Any other interesting stories out there? ----------------------------------------------- ** The ETNI Rag ** http://www.etni.org/etnirag/ Much more than just a journal ** Etni homepage - http://www.etni.org or - http://www.etni.org.il ** ** for help - ask@xxxxxxxx ** ** to post to this list - etni@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ** -----------------------------------------------