**** ETNI on the web http://www.etni.org.il http://www.etni.org **** Here's the great debate again - an article singing the praises of more explicit grammar instruction and a brilliant response to it. Write Minded: Grammar Hip Again It's hard to believe, but grammar is hot. For the first time, Florida students in February will face a section on the FCAT that will test their ability to recognize grammatically correct sentences, and there's a new emphasis on the subject at schools. Cathy Taylor, a 10th-grade applied communication teacher at Kathleen High School, is elated. "I've seen a lot of things come and go in my teaching career, and grammar is one of those things we haven't paid much attention to in the last couple of years," said the 30-year teaching veteran. Taylor isn't the only one who would like to see more emphasis on good grammar. Running ahead of the pack in the crusade is Patricia T. O'Conner, author of "Woe is I" (Riverhead Trade Paperback, $13), released in paperback earlier this summer and now in its second edition. Like the unlikely best-seller about punctuation, "Eats Shoots and Leaves," "Woe is I" uses a fresh, lingo-free approach to understanding proper grammar that is far from yawn-inducing. The slim, approachable book includes chapters titled: "Plurals Before Swine: Blunders with Numbers," "Verbal Abuse: Words on the Endangered List" and "Death Sentence: Do Cliches Deserve to Die?" O'Conner also illustrates the pitfalls of e-mail and instant messaging, which often exacerbate bad writing because they are hastily written and quickly sent. "We are becoming increasingly estranged from language," O'Conner said, calling from her home in Roxbury, Conn. She said we are losing our ability to communicate with precision and clarity because our grammar muscles have been neglected for so long. In the 1970s, grammar was pushed aside because it was considered elitist and thought to stifle creativity. But that was wrong, O'Conner said. "There is nothing worse for a child's self-esteem than to know he is not communicating well. The more you know about language, the more you'll be able to harness it for your own needs." At Lake Gibson Middle School, Sharlene Pierce, who teaches sixth-, seventh- and eighth-grade English, said the number of students writing in fragments are increasing. "So many of my kids are (used to) instant messaging, so they don't worry about complete sentences." She also said kids will use numerals or phonetics instead of words, such as "2" for "too" or "U" for "you" when writing essays. "Kids often write like they speak," said Pierce. "They don't always understand the difference between standard English and everyday speak." Subject-verb agreement, for example, is also a problem. "A student may write, `he run' instead of `He runs.' " But we're all guilty of bad writing. E-mail, O'Conner said, is where most of us are prone to sloppy writing. To help remedy the situation, the latest edition of "Woe is I" includes a chapter called "E-mail Intuition: Does Anything Go?" dedicated to writing intelligent messages. The best way to become a better communicator is to read more books. Pierce said students who are the strongest writers are usually the strongest readers. O'Conner agrees. "Thank heaven for books like Harry Potter and Lemony Snicket," she said. "It's not too late to revive a child's fascination for reading." And it's not too late to teach them good grammar. Grammar isn't a bunch of rules for rules' sake, O'Conner said. "There is nothing mysterious about it: Good grammar is simply good communication." Shelley Preston can be reached at 863-802-7517 or shelley.preston@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Ms. Preston, Decontextualized grammar drills lost favor among English teachers not because grammar is elitist but because nearly a century of research shows that drills and exercises don't improve writing or speaking. For decades, grammar books were the staple of English classes, and teachers dutifully marched students through chapter after chapter of rules and exercises purporting to teach subject-verb agreement and standard usage and all those other skills that would mark us as educated people and distinguish us from the hoi polloi. The same teachers perennially complained that the skills didn't transfer to real writing or speaking. One major study of the effects of this kind of grammar study concluded that grammar drills actually have a negative effect in that they take precious time away from actual writing. What does improve grammar and usage is writing for purposes and audiences that truly matter to writers themselves. A student journalist, for example, cares passionately about spelling and syntax and punctuation when she knows that her work will be read by a couple thousand of her peers. Grammar instruction is most effective in the context of a student's own writing. Working side by side with a young writer on his own short story, I can teach him more in five minutes than five years of isolated drill could accomplish. The addition of "objective" items to FCAT writing will benefit no one except the textbook makers and teachers who prefer grading review Exercises A and B to working with real writers and their writing. As for the effect on oral language, our speech patterns are shaped by our friends and family, and we change them only when there are social or professional consequences that matter to us. I grew up in a family that said "he don't" and "it don't" and although I aced all the grammar exercises, I continued to speak the way my family did until I went to college and decided I wanted to sound more high-falutin'. I won't hold it against you, but there's a subject-verb agreement error in your article. Best regards, Gloria Pipkin, President Florida Coalition for Assessment Reform, Inc. gpipkin@xxxxxxx http://www.fcar.info ? Shelley Preston The Ledger (Lakeland, FL) 2004-09-01 http://www.theledger.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20040901/NEWS/409010334/1021 ##### To send a message to the ETNI list email: etni@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ##### ##### Send queries and questions to: ask@xxxxxxxx #####