----- Original Message ----- From: sbshai - sbshai@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: HOTS in L2 Hurrah Hadassah! Finally someone else besides a group of teachers in Jerusalem -- and she's someone who speaks from experience with HOTS where it all started -- is bringing up the same valid point that we have been 'hot under the collar' about ever since we heard the 'not so hot' idea to browbeat our ESL students with so-called innovate higher order thinking skills when they learn literature in L2. Hadassah (and others) will probably disagree about this, but the way I see it, the phrase "higher order" refers not to the thinking skills themselves -- as we've ALWAYS used them in teaching literature (though without insisting that our students parrot their names); rather, the term comes to remind us that we teachers are being ordered from on high (i.e., the Inspectorate/MOE) to force these terms on our students in an attempt to make them better thinkers! The ludicrousness of hanging such an albatross on students who are struggling with basic proficiency in English (I say this after noting a general decline in 5 point classes in a reputable school where I have been teaching for 18 years -- and many others report a similar trend ) has been propounded often enough on ETNI and elsewhere by many of my colleagues. We have pointed out all manner of weaknesses and fallacies in the program -- not its stated goals, to which we can easily agree -- just to the proposed method to achieve them. The only thing that bears repeating here is Hadassah's point -- why HOTS in L2 -- which appeared on the petition letter to our Chief Inspector that was signed by some 34 schools in Jerusalem. The answer we received essentially said that the Ministry is working on introducing HOTS in L1 in the elementary schools, which we had suggested was the most sensible place to start; however, there was no adequate explanation for the reason we are being told to start this program NOW in EFL. Our objection to infusing HOTS into literature, a subject which presents enough of a challenge to most ESL students, was similarly dismissed in the following words: "Even now, in high school, teachers can teach the HOTS in different areas of language learning. Then, when they start to teach literature, they will only have to spiral their use of the HOTS and not explicitly teach them." I'm sure this was said to make us feel better about HOTS as there now appears to be less rigidity in teaching it, but for me (and many colleagues with whom I've discussed the issue) this statement makes the whole program appear more befuddled than ever before. All things considered, great strides have been made by the nascent group of high school English teachers in Jerusalem in redefining the parameters of the HOTS program so that it is more palatable for us and more beneficial for our students. It's now time for our colleagues in the rest of the country to make their voices heard -- and towards this aim, Nina has undertaken the project. All you have to do is send her your name so that you can be counted as one who cannot agree to implement the HOTS program AS IT NOW STANDS. If you hesitate now, you may never get another chance -- so GO for it! Send your name today to: golomb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Wishing us pleasant days ahead, Batya ----------------------------------------------- ** Etni homepage - http://www.etni.org or - http://www.etni.org.il ** ** for help - ask@xxxxxxxx ** ** to post to this list - etni@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ** -----------------------------------------------