pwned
On Feb 14, 2020, at 9:53 AM, Than Boves <tboves@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I wouldn't ignore the 1 g gps units either. While recapturing using the same
trap may be difficult, finding the bird's nest and using mist nets in front
of the nest or using bow nets seems possible. This may take more time than
some have of course.
Get Outlook for
Android<https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faka.ms%2Fghei36&data=02%7C01%7Cchill%40coastal.edu%7C0ac77a9c4d794717fb6e08d7b15db46e%7Cbf1f856b8ef84e52be9387d3c3622797%7C0%7C0%7C637172888336804610&sdata=LsTbcg3YE%2Fd6nbNkhmGP5u8Hu3vvcOy7i%2F24tN%2FH2E4%3D&reserved=0>
________________________________
From: eloshwg-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <eloshwg-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf
of Rush, Scott <scott.rush@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2020 8:48:34 AM
To: eloshwg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <eloshwg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [eloshwg] Re: March meeting agenda to date
Good morning,
Adding to the list of tracking devices that could be applied to Loggerhead
Shrike are GPS data loggers. These loggers are small enough now that a LOSH
could carry them, recording GPS locations on a programed schedule with these
data then stored onboard the logger. Issue with GPS dataloggers of this type,
and small enough to be carried by a LOSH, is that you would need to recapture
the bird to download these data. Given how much LOSH like to be recaptured
this is likely not a viable option for these birds at this point.
Just in case there is some condition in which these GPS devices could be
suitable I wanted to put this detail out there.
Scott
From: eloshwg-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <eloshwg-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf
Of Hazel Wheeler
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2020 8:43 AM
To: eloshwg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [eloshwg] Re: March meeting agenda to date
The internal document that I drafted for Environment Canada are guidelines
for the attachment of tracking devices to birds, so offers a summary on
different tag types (PIT, radio, satellite, data loggers), and description of
a limited number of attachment methods (glue, leg loop, body harness - all
others were considered out of scope for the current document). Looking back
at it, I think the most I would do as a “presentation” would be a slide or
two of a few key take-aways from the shrike perspective, but I think the only
real tech option at this point is radio, as all others are currently too
heavy or aren’t appropriate for short-distance migrants.
Things I can offer:
- opinions on selecting tags, and attachment methods (I’d also be curious to
compare methods with Than)
- my experiences with Motus towers
- comparison of Nanotags (tracked on Motus) vs. Lifetags (solar powered, by
Cellular Tracking Technologies)
Would folks find this useful?
Hazel
—
Hazel Wheeler, MSc
Lead Biologist - Eastern Loggerhead Shrike Recovery
Wildlife Preservation
Canada<https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Furldefense.proofpoint.com%2Fv2%2Furl%3Fu%3Dhttps-3A__secure-2Dweb.cisco.com_1gDvNd78wloyD6sxob-5FiFlDJNNSK2WYsxbGVjHiHr9dPeJCkoDOJfmfoHpbtr2FM5SM9RIgh-2DZxHR3jVJ8fHtUg0QZ95UCrC0J9cnJCwLTcn8ZCpjgrrL0BiHTvsdcFye-2DDt3IlxTkAcGa-2Dn2-2DvKxNyKkXZpzd-2D7Xs-2DpdzX73XNe2B6trXpaCIjJITd1YmeEElk2Ka-5FDlkCAg8K2V0q3AQPXNYWP-5FejThXiCa7JFxW7q9K3aT6-5F-5F2cU-5F6hDXj1QthREMgXyahNB1YlmJjakpcHEef2WHMJAkC-5FJ-5FkuCZp9b6kf4fcHoEUymZN-2Dn4XUeKHN5dgYlFmnN9lMEPhueaZnQ_https-253A-252F-252Fwildlifepreservation.ca-252F%26d%3DDwMGaQ%26c%3DQzRQJlHx0ZTYmlwGx7ptjrPEeuNmnYRxm_FN73lod7w%26r%3D7GY_tLFKiggtwGF79-jINsYKU9T9mwO7Mj-3mSpAuok%26m%3DA_8xgBfFMxs9cc8j33AxjMJFvEQvdF46bCx7d6Sm-os%26s%3D3vplqCwxZuA7KGG7qJrcOFZUcuNl0Nyq9nqw95EhoNY%26e&data=02%7C01%7Cchill%40coastal.edu%7C0ac77a9c4d794717fb6e08d7b15db46e%7Cbf1f856b8ef84e52be9387d3c3622797%7C0%7C0%7C637172888336804610&sdata=dslhuBaQvxEH9bv6FBVE1YafHkq2VYkR1iPWhZ%2Foul0%3D&reserved=0=>
E: hazel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:hazel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
C: 519-362-9780
On Feb 13, 2020, at 11:38, Amy Chabot
<achabot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:achabot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Hi all,
I will ask Hazel to be more specific, but, in brief, she put together a
"review" on the tracking methods, other than banding, used in birds (small
birds? passerines) for Environment Canada. As she noted, it may not have
completed internal review, but she can provide us with a presentation on
methods, BMPs for them, etc.
Over to Hazel...
Amy
________________________________
From: eloshwg-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:eloshwg-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[eloshwg-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:eloshwg-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] on behalf
of Christopher Hill
[dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2020 11:34 AM
To: eloshwg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:eloshwg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [eloshwg] Re: March meeting agenda to date
Discussion of our ability to monitor movements (by means beyond banding)?
Didn’t you hint that Hazel had something she could present?
C
On Feb 13, 2020, at 11:22 AM, amy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:amy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Hi all,
As requested, here is the draft March meeting agenda. Based on today's call,
we don't need to add anything, but I will be looking to re-arrange times to
ensure adequate discussion is possible. If there is anything missing, if you
think we can "do without" anything and if anything is a priority in addition
to what we talked about today (i.e. you want to be sure we have enough time
to discuss it), please get back to my by end of this month.
Thanks!
Amy
<Loggerhead Shrike Working Group Meeting Agenda_2020.docx>
email filtering provided by
(((GRIFFCOMM<https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Furldefense.proofpoint.com%2Fv2%2Furl%3Fu%3Dhttp-3A__secure-2Dweb.cisco.com_1XvvpmjrivvO3CkI9I44H7XwGxPR1POnT0igwvHkpQKPrKQF0Jf3f-5F0s-2DjGexUJHFvAyc7FpfA1BkSGNrOQPYS6RJjMEAc5tc3J-2D3gFJKEOIAS-2DzoJD4JGIcpxN2GspGfHDEIwuPzWURNeD3PihSQ6kV16JWn-2DgORYGad7c6ds6vcioHn5ikxrHhTMYRA-2DWoLIIlFczsydZIqlrhTdTP4Y5-5FXqAr4OFjjE4M5bOOppTLu2wbbP0ca6CCfY-5FBXwDOZFP-2DhsMPc7ieJGHDEbKmToFCNnJgUmXGyEhQklpy8uWoGP3EnOmJiurKhSlVgfSIuzlBxMZZI-5Fv2746cajTmzVw_http-253A-252F-252Fwww.griffcomm.ca-252Fmail-2Dfiltering-2Dr-252F-253FALS%26d%3DDwMGaQ%26c%3DQzRQJlHx0ZTYmlwGx7ptjrPEeuNmnYRxm_FN73lod7w%26r%3D7GY_tLFKiggtwGF79-jINsYKU9T9mwO7Mj-3mSpAuok%26m%3DA_8xgBfFMxs9cc8j33AxjMJFvEQvdF46bCx7d6Sm-os%26s%3DcTvXTjReDkcNFNIXB-AXiwYpKITCqh9BczlnlHQ5jX0%26e&data=02%7C01%7Cchill%40coastal.edu%7C0ac77a9c4d794717fb6e08d7b15db46e%7Cbf1f856b8ef84e52be9387d3c3622797%7C0%7C0%7C637172888336814609&sdata=r9eSZy5unG%2FIx%2B%2FPhfBitHhrRBTFgLWe%2BEUtdFSd%2Fi0%3D&reserved=0=>
ELOSHWG is a private forum restricted solely to individuals who participate
in the Eastern Loggerhead Shrike working group and are involved with
Loggerhead Shrike research and banding.
To post messages, address your email to eloshwg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.
To send a message to the moderators, address your email to
eloshwg-moderators@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.
For ELOSHWG archives or to change your subscription status (e.g. set vacation
digest mode, or to unsubscribe) go to:
https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.freelists.org%2Flist%2Feloshwg&data=02%7C01%7Cchill%40coastal.edu%7C0ac77a9c4d794717fb6e08d7b15db46e%7Cbf1f856b8ef84e52be9387d3c3622797%7C0%7C0%7C637172888336814609&sdata=Oix1KXlS9aj05b8nS15dLwX2Z1eBmmFMZPe7KzmpwyQ%3D&reserved=0
