excellent!
then one final
7.5.2 FIELD COMBAT PROCEDURE: Field combats simulate open-eld
battles. Individual eld combats may be resolved in any order determined
by the phasing player, and may be intermixed with any limited eld and/or
trivial combats. A combat in one area must be completed before
commencing another combat.
this means Laertis has to tell me i.e 1st in Wittenberg, 2nd in Kustrin etc or
1st resolve Wittenberg and then decide which will be next?
________________________________
From: eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf
of Makis Xiroyannis <makis.xiroyannis@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, October 9, 2018 15:37
To: eiagreek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [eiagreek] Re: [dicelog] Forage Rolls
ALL MOVES first, then battles. Retreat behind walls is part of the battles
section.
On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 3:31 PM Laertes Papaspyrou
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
7.5 ] THE LAND COMBAT STEP: At the end of all movement and supply
in a player's sequence the land combat procedure commences.
7.5.1 GENERAL RULES OF LAND COMBAT: If at the end of all movement
of the phasing major power, enemy forces (excluding guerillas-see 10.1.1.3)
occupy the same area as its corps, freikorps or cossacks, the phasing major
power must attack in those areas (also see 7.3.7 and 7.3.8). The phasing
side is the "attacker" and the non-phasing side is the "defender"
On Tuesday, 9 October 2018, 15:29:50 EEST, Laertes Papaspyrou
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Its first all moves and then battles.
On Tuesday, 9 October 2018, 15:26:34 EEST, Dimitris Stavr.
<poliorkitis@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:poliorkitis@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
since 7.5.1.1 allows the corps to retire into the city and we have decided that
the enemy corps that enters the area MUST stop anyway, then you may consider
all prussian corps outside
could you please clarify how it works the following?
we play ALL our moves and then decide where to do what OR we go move by move.
for example
if we go move by move, when Blake entered Kustrin, the prussian corps had some
chances to withdraw successfully to Berlin,
now, having all moves played, like current spanish turn, it doesn't have this
option.
which is the proper way?
________________________________
From: eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Laertes Papaspyrou
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: Tuesday, October 9, 2018 14:51
To: eiagreek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:eiagreek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [eiagreek] Re: [dicelog] Forage Rolls
I'm sure we have always had the defender decide and then go for the battles one
by one.
I dont mind (we still need to decide on this) really. Wittenberg first
On Tuesday, 9 October 2018, 14:44:20 EEST, Laertes Papaspyrou
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
I guess the way we play 7.3.7.1 is not valid as we dont specify where the corps
is. It is always assumed it is outside with the ablility to move inside before
the battle according to 7.5.1.1?
7.3.7.1 ENEMY CORPS OR CITY GARRISON IN AREA: If during
movement a corps moves into an area containing enemy corps not in a city,
the corps must cease movement and declare an attack. If enemy corps
and/or garrison factors are in a city the phasing corps may continue
movement or stop movement and besiege (see 7.5.4) or not, as the owning
player desires. If he decides to besiege the enemy corps and forages for
supply, the foraging die roll is not reduced due to unconsumed movement
points (see 7.3.2). if any friendly forces in an area besiege enemy forces
then all friendly forces in that area (except depot garrisons) must besiege
the enemy forces.
7.5.1.1 DEFENDER RETIREMENT INTO CITY: Any forces or portion o 1f
forces upon whom an attack is declared may immediately retire into any
friendly controlled or vacant, and unbesieged city in that area but not so as
to exceed that city's garrison capacity
On Tuesday, 9 October 2018, 14:42:01 EEST, Laertes Papaspyrou
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
so we do them one by one?
On Tuesday, 9 October 2018, 14:27:38 EEST, Dimitris Stavr.
<poliorkitis@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:poliorkitis@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
there are 4 battles, would be helpful to tell me which battle goes 1st, 2nd etc
________________________________
From: eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Laertes Papaspyrou
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: Tuesday, October 9, 2018 13:29
To: eiagreek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:eiagreek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [eiagreek] Re: [dicelog] Forage Rolls
sure, no problem.
On Tuesday, 9 October 2018, 13:22:20 EEST, Dimitris Stavr.
<poliorkitis@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:poliorkitis@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
well played in the depot, thought you could use it next turn, but this is only
if garrisoned.
i'll take my time if you don't mind
________________________________
From: eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Laertes Papaspyrou
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: Tuesday, October 9, 2018 13:07
To: eiagreek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:eiagreek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [eiagreek] Re: [dicelog] Forage Rolls
I converted your depot and used it to feed the corps around.
I rolled after the turn upload so no they haven’t been removed.
I corps in Berlin
II In Wittenberg
All battles expect Berlin are trivial
On 9 Oct 2018, at 13:02, Dimitris Stavr.
<poliorkitis@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:poliorkitis@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
could you please explain the 3,5$ around Kassel?
and your forage loses are removed from which corps?
________________________________
From: eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Laertes Papaspyrou
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: Tuesday, October 9, 2018 12:55
To: eiagreek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:eiagreek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [eiagreek] Re: [dicelog] Forage Rolls
I think I need to break my aliance with FRance!!!
3 and 5 losses in Berlin and Wittenberg respectively
On Tuesday, 9 October 2018, 12:54:07 EEST, Dice Server -47x0zk-
<diceserver@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:diceserver@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
This is an automatic message.
This message was generated by
bitoulis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:bitoulis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
through the "hamete virtual dice server" at https://dicelog.com
Message sent to:
bitoulis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:bitoulis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
eiagreek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:eiagreek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Dice Roll Information:
----------------------
1 - Berlin
2- Wittenberg
Dice Results:
-------------
Rolling "1d6 <= 1" 2 times
1: 4 ... failure
2: 6 ... failure
sum: 10, average: 5.00, success: 0/2 0%
If you have any doubt, you can verify the validity of this message,
using the Verification Number on https://dicelog.com/verif :
4c81x6j8zp
or simply (*) click the URL:
https://dicelog.com/verif?vnum=4c81x6j8zp
(*): you may have a security warning about invalid SSL certificate,
see why: http://dicelog.com/inc/sslwarning_en.html
Regards,
the dicelog.com<http://dicelog.com> team.
