Ackroyd's non-fiction is often fabulou8s. London is a great book. I also quite enjoyed Hawksmoore but thought the one about archiology in Wiltshire was rubbish. On 29 Oct 2013, at 18:48, Shell wrote: > Steve, I did attempt to read Hawksmore by Peter Ackroyd some years ago and > couldn't get on with it. I haven't read him since, but then I was a lot > younger when I tried him and might get on better now. > Shell. > > > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "Steven Bingham" <steven.bingham1@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2013 12:16 PM > To: <ebooktalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: [ebooktalk] PETER ACKROYD THE CASEBOOK OF VICTOR FRANKENSTINE > > > Hi > > > > > > > > I have nearly finished this fascinating novel. It is a retelling of the > > Frankenstine story for the point of view of Victor Frankenstine. Shelley is > > a character in the story. > > > > > > > > One thing that strikes me about Ackroyd's writing is that he is very good on > > smell. Smell doesn't often get a look in in fiction and I suppose this is > > reasonable as we don't really notice it. Today the prominent smell of most > > of our towns and a good bit of the countryside is the smell of petrol or > > diesel oil from vehicles. Transport has always had a large impact on the > > smell of a place up until the end of the first World War it would have been > > the smells associated with horses. Up until the adoption of modern sewage > > treatment and particularly the water closet much of the smell of a place > > would have been attributable to human waste. > > > > > > > > The book is set in the period around 1820. At that time the smell of London > > must have been horrendous by modern standards. Not only did you have the > > horse and human waste but cattle were kept, often in cellars, to provide > > milk; there were large numbers of slaughter houses to provide meat and of > > course all these animals to feed provide dairy produce and eggs would have > > to be driven through the streets. Then there was the river . We have all > > heard about the 'Great Stink' of the 1850s. > > > > > > > > So ackroyd does describe the stench of the places, not obsessively, but > > enough to make it fairly real. > > > > > > > > Steve > > > >