[duxuser] Re: Braile Graphics, PIAF Paper

  • From: "George Bell" <george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <duxuser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <AERNet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 00:25:19 -0000

Hi Rick,
 
I must first apologise for taking so long to reply.  No excuses on my
part - I just left it in my Follow Up folder for too long.
 
In my personal view, Flexipaper from Repro-Tronics in New Jersey is
about the best on the market world-wide.
 
It's way more expensive here in the U.K compared to the local Zychem,
but the image produced is far better.  Your PAIF should handle both.
 
However, you do need to appreciate that there is a difference between
images produced by tactile image enhancers (and I include the PIAF
here) and braille embossers.
 
Feel free to contact me to discuss further,
 
All the best,
George W. F. Bell
Managing Director
Techno-Vision Systems Ltd.
76, Bunting Road Ind. Est.
NORTHAMPTON, NN2 6EE
United Kingdom.

Tel: +44 (0) 160 479 2777 (Within UK - 01604 792777)
Fax: +44 (0) 160 479 2726 (Within UK - 01604 792726)

Email: george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Web: http://www.techno=vision.co.uk <http://www.techno=vision.co.uk/>



________________________________

From: duxuser-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:duxuser-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rick Boggess
Sent: 29 December 2009 20:10
To: AERNet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; duxuser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [duxuser] Braile Graphics, PIAF Paper


WE will be using the PIAF to copy some graphics to be inserted into
some braille documents. Are there differences in the quality of
capsule paper used by the PIAF and the Tactile Image Enhancer?  
 
Are there sites, besides APH, which have downloadable graphics?  Can
these graphics be printed on braille paper or do you need  capsule
paper?  Is the fre version of QuickTac from Duxbury adequate for
editing these graphics or do you need something more powerful?
 
Rick Boggess

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. duxuser
  3. Archive
  4. 01-2010