Andreas Gohr [13.10.2008 17:05]: > Hi all! > > I'm thinking of moving the DokuWiki repository to the new format > introduced by darcs 2.x > > It is said to be much faster and more robust, but it's incompatible > with darcs 1.x clients. To do this I need to know which darcs versions > you all use or have access to. > > AFAIK darcs 2.x is only available in Debian testing - is that a > problem for anybody? Can anyone tell how difficult it is to install a > lenny darcs package on etch? > > So if you use darcs with DokuWiki, please reply with your current > darcs version, your operating system and how hard it would hit you if > we'd upgrade to darcs 2.x. > > Andi > Hi Andi, rz36:~> uname -a Linux rz36 2.6.25.16-0.1-default #1 SMP Thu Sep 11 11:39:35 CEST 2008 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux rz36:~> which darcs /usr/local/bin/darcs rz36:~> darcs -v 2.0.2 (release) This box is running openSUSE 11.0, and using the static binary from <http://vandal.sdf-eu.org/darcs-2.0.2-linux-amd64-static.tar.gz> works fine on SLES10, too. The darcs plugin (from <http://wiki.erazor-zone.de/wiki:projects:php:dokuwiki:plugins:darcs>) is very slow since the bugfixing weekend anyway ;-) BTW, I agree to Sebastian's point about the reasons for switching. Regards, Werner -- Werner Flamme, Abt. WKDV Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung GmbH - UFZ Permoserstr. 15 - 04318 Leipzig Tel.: (0341) 235-1921 - Fax (0341) 235-451921 http://www.ufz.de - eMail: werner.flamme@xxxxxx -- DokuWiki mailing list - more info at http://wiki.splitbrain.org/wiki:mailinglist