> > (i see how many time you have to clean out "ksdfhzuewrn sf skhsdfuirweb > sg blablabla" tests of your wiki in regular sites. If playground would by > hidden, bat thing ;-) > > (you need maybe a playground button on your template.) > > The hide option will hide the page from search results and the RSS feed. > Links to the page will work just fine and the page is accessible as every > other page. So this is effectively the option you are trying to reinvent. > > Please take the time to check how features work when suggested to you, > instead of assuming how they might work. I now this. If i oversee some functions, sorry for this, my experiences are based on the last official release, and if i down't see a change on the place of the patch, cold by that i oversee a effect on a other place in the code witch clean the effect as well i try to patch. I test this patch (RSS exclusion) with the newest version, and i am sorry, but i can agree with your arguments. no read permission **not** exclude the rss of the site, in dw version 2008-03-11. It is hidden in the index, if you use a sitebar with the index as navigator, the playground is hidden and you have to place a extra link somewhere (i now, you down't use a sitebar, but some do) In my opinion, hide something from index/search and something from rss is not the same and should by managed separately. All arguments are proofed as best i can, otherwise i will not waste my time to make patches, this is not my regular work. (speaking from css rss linebreak patches now.) ---- i interrupt this discussion now here, and i explain you why. There are two extremes witch work like poison. One extreme is feature addicted. This cores a todo list longer than the bible, a complex code witch nobody is able to understand anymore, and a code witch is more faulty and faulty and never finished. The other extreme is fear and resistance of changing anything or take any change as a criticism to the project, this cores discussions of 300 flip-flops for any little code line, denying anyway everything is the result, and all was nothing then a time waste and frustrating. The difficulty is to find the balance in between. Everybody can do in his environment what ever he want , i can patch what ever i want, demolish what ever i want, and put the must ugliest and stupid design you can find in the internet if i want. And you can do what ever you want. I try to share what was good for my, but i respect, this is your project. So i set for me a limit of 3 - 5 flip-flop discussions for such little changes. Every patch is only a few lines of code with maybe a big good effect and have no complexification sideeffect. I have and will patch this, and i try to subscribe why, as good as possible in bad english. If you down't agree with me, cool, no problem, go your way and be happy, and i will do the same. I down't fight for reasons and territory. All arguments are proofed as best i can, otherwise i will not waste my time to make patches, this is not my regular work. (speaking from css rss linebreak patches now specially) So pleas understand if i interrupt the discussion here. :-) (if you have something important or a "killer" argument, i still respond.) If i am now explaining my behaving, a second thing. I detect that sarcasm and then specially the expectation of sarcasm cause a lot of friction and misunderstanding, and permanent preparedness of self defense (of course, beside of arrogance bigmouthness sociopathie egoism arrogance nazism mobbing psychopathie and arrogance et et et. Look to wikipedia, step by step all good people run frustrated away and only egosentrixx remain ;-) So wen ever i write something, you can take this 1:1 to 99.9% (i am not perfect), because i try to let out any sarcasm. So, "cool, go your way and be happy" is no sarcasm!!!! :-) :-) i wish you the best ant tanks for your work. Jetzt komfortabel bei Arcor-Digital TV einsteigen: Mehr Happy Ends, mehr Herzschmerz, mehr Fernsehen! Erleben Sie 50 digitale TV Programme und optional 60 Pay TV Sender, einen elektronischen Programmführer mit Movie Star Bewertungen von TV Movie. Außerdem, aktuelle Filmhits und prickelnde Erotik in der Arcor-Videothek. Infos unter www.arcor.de/tv -- DokuWiki mailing list - more info at http://wiki.splitbrain.org/wiki:mailinglist