[DZR] Re: Call for DirectiXer bug reports and suggestions
- From: "stephen samuels" <ssamuels@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <directixer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 20:11:36 -0700
Dan and all
I've been into Chainer for a long time now... IMHO you can spend better
money on an audio app... it takes a while to understand what you can really
do with it, but its totally brilliant...
I talk with Thomas the author fairly often and just to let you know, there
are new versions coming ... they will support DX and DXi and other niffty
feature... I can't say when but from what Thomas says it can't be that far
away....
i've told people about Chainer for long time and they often think i'm
nuts.... that is until they buy it... then they come back and it's all
"holy shit's and WoW's".... I have even found that things that won't run
well as wrapped vsti's, when loaded into a wraped Chainer VSTi will work
beautifully.... anyway enuff... and no, I have no share in the Xlutop
company.... hahahaha it's a one man affair.
peace and love
----- Original Message -----
From: "Daniel Fortin" <dan14@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <directixer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 6:46 PM
Subject: [DZR] Re: Call for DirectiXer bug reports and suggestions
> > Would you keep this assignment per-project (saved with all other plugin
> > settings into a SONAR or other host project) or per-plugin (kept with
> > DirectiXer settings)?
>
> I would prefer per-plugin so that we would make the change once and forget
> about it.
>
> > In the latter case, I see a danger of damaging existing projects by
> > modifying global assignments of controllers. I would rather not
> > implement such an approach.
>
> That could be fixed with a "reset to default" function. And of course we
> could save different configs.
>
> > In the former case, the UI for controller munging must be available
> > within the host UI. This is certainly possible but requires more time
> > that I have for version 2.4.
>
> I would prefer the per-plugin solution anyway ;)
>
> > Have you used MidiOx / MidiYoke combination? MidiOx can do really
> > complex transforms of MIDI data, and MidiYoke can deliver them from
> > MidiOx to SONAR. This way, you are recording exactly what plugin sees,
> > and not in danger of losing mapping of controllers.
> >
> > Does this spell "solution" or "workaround"? :)
>
> No but I found an other one : Chainer.
> I have the demo installed for a while now and just discovered that you can
> map any CC to any funtion whether CC control is implemented or not. I
think
> I will make the hole in my credit card a bit larger soon :)
>
> Dan.
>
> =====================================================================
> Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/directixer/
> Unsubscribe: mailto:directixer-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?body=unsubscribe
> Admin: mailto:kkm@xxxxxxxxx
> =====================================================================
>
=====================================================================
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/directixer/
Unsubscribe: mailto:directixer-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?body=unsubscribe
Admin: mailto:kkm@xxxxxxxxx
=====================================================================
Other related posts:
