Hi, I'll take, Should we be tactically voting to keep the Conservatives out? Thanks, Marie -----Original Message----- From: Alex Helling <alex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: debatewiserrt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Tue, 4 May 2010 19:02 Subject: [Debatewise RRT] Remember to vote! Hi everyone, The election will be over on Thursday, everyone make sure you get out and vote as it is still the closest election in decades so for once your vote counts... or else it might not take a look at http://www.voterpower.org.uk/ too see how much your vote it worth. However I don’t think it is a particularly accurate reflection for example my vote is supposedly worth 0.771 which is pretty marginal however in reality this is not the case as it is a Tory seat and the chances of a swing against the conservatives is pretty small. Anyhow with the election out the way (excepting negotiations for if there has to be a coalition) we will suddenly have less political things to discuss, and I am sure you are all sick of them anyway. Anyhow in order to make things slightly different we were thinking we might have themed weeks which would mean us doing more debates on non current affairs topics. So we might have a week on art or philosophy. Some of the questions in the RRT would be on this topic – I don’t know how many but I don’t want to exclude current affairs entirely. Anyhow would you be interested in doing this/do you think it is a good idea? Also suggestions about what you would like to see done? And if you have suggestions for a topic feel free to give me ideas for debate titles too. Alex Debates: Should we be tactically voting to keep the Conservatives out? Gordon Brown in today’s Guardian urges ‘all those with genuinely progressive values to vote labour on Thursday.’ Asking Lib dem supporters to vote tactically to avoid a Conservative government that would be against that progressive agenda, but should we be voting tactically? http://www.spectator.co.uk/coffeehouse/5968963/will-the-tactical-voting-plea-work.thtml http://clients.squareeye.com/uploads/compass/Torytargetsword.doc.doc The war on terror is more about law enforcement and the police than the military. The Bush administration always considered the ‘War on Terror’ or whichever of its subsequent rebrandings you wish to use as being in large part, as mostly a militarily occupation. Afghanistan had to be occupied to force Al Qaeda out and destroy their training camps, there have to be military offensives into Pakistan’s frontier territories and Iraq was invaded due to possible links to terrorism. However the vast majority of the real anti terrorism goes on internally in by security services and police forces gathering information and then foiling attacks with arrests. http://www.slate.com/id/2252724/ Animals have a right to privacy. We have all been captivated by documentaries about various types of animals, be they cute and furry or extraordinarily alien. Wildlife documentaries are a large part of the landscape of documentary TV. The filming of the wildlife is just seen as a challenge and is never questioned, should we be asking not ‘how can this animal be filmed?’ but ‘should this animal be filmed?’ http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/10093327.stm http://www.uea.ac.uk/mac/comm/media/press/2010/april/homepagenews/Animals%27+right+to+privacy+infringed+by+documentary+makers Online video rights will be the next big revenue stream for sports events. Most football matches are broadcast live, but often they are not on TV but are instead online. Various sites such as the FA’s official site and ITV have been broadcasting them. At the moment the big revenue stream for sport is TV through the advertising commercial broadcasters get. However as people begin to watch their sport through different mediums, particularly the internet this is bound to change. Yahoo has secured the exclusive UK online highlights rights for the English Premier League from 2010 to 2013 in a multi million pound deal, showing that this may already be becoming a revenue stream to be tapped. http://www.theuksportsnetwork.com/the-future-of-football-broadcasting-lies-online/ http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8648414.stm Debates on site: Does Japan need US military Bases? Ever since the DJP was elected the main foreign policy issue that has affected the party has been an attempt to find a renegotiate a deal for a US base in Okinawa. This has become the defining issue of Prime Minister Hatoyama’s premiership. He has less than a month until a self imposed deadline on deciding the future of the base. Japan has thousands of US troops on its soil that it pays for, however it also has one of the most powerful armed forces in the world so does it really need the US troops at all? http://www.globalpolicy.org/component/content/article/152-challenges/48814-pacific-pushback-has-the-us-empire-of-bases-reached-its-high-water-mark-.html http://www.japantoday.com/category/politics/view/hatoyama-arrives-in-okinawa-to-discuss-us-base-issue http://www.japantoday.com/category/politics/view/okada-says-us-marines-needed-for-japans-defense http://www.asahi.com/english/TKY201005030197.html Offshore drilling should be banned. The dangers to the environment of offshore drilling has been highlighted by a blowout on the Deepwater Horizon rig in the Gulf of Mexico leaking hundreds of thousands of gallons of oil into the sea where it could cause an environmental catastrophe. This comes only a few days after President Obama conceded that there could be much more drilling off the coast of the USA, a policy that was already under fire from his own party. http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/may/03/deepwater-horizon-oil-spill-turtle-deaths-soar http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-05-03/schwarzenegger-drops-support-for-offshore-oil-wells-update1-.html Do papers declaring their support for a party have an impact? Britain’s papers have normally been partisan even between elections and they get even more so during an election where they declare their support for a particular party. Even if this is less the case than it used to be with papers trying to show a bit more independence their leanings are still usually pretty much. As it is usually obvious which party a paper will support does it matter if they declare who they are supporting? And when they do change their support do they really bring their readers with them? http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/may/03/election-2010-newspapers-influence-over-voters http://electionblog2010.blogspot.com/2010/04/how-powerful-are-newspapers.html Britain has become a more open minded place. Labour may be leaving the country in dire financial straits and not changed public services as radically as they might have done but whether it was caused by them or not Britain has probably become more tolerant. It may seem from the perennial theme of election campaigns that is asylum seekers and economic migrants that nothing changes. However this masks that most worry is about migrants from Eastern Europe rather than worries about people of a different colour, Eastern Europeans are simply a worry because they appear to be taking jobs and arrived so suddenly but within a short time if they stay they will be integrated. On various other areas Britain is more tolerant; of gays, of other races and generally of other religions – even if there are worries and linking of Muslims and terrorism. http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/may/03/labour-indelible-mark-british-culture http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2010/jan/26/survey-social-liberal-conservative-supporters http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/2010/02/transforming-britain-by-accident/