A MOTU 2408 with the mkII interface. I am using some drivers, from back in 2004. However, I did load up the latest vista/XP 32 drivers for the latest MOTU with the mkIII interface, and achieved the same results as previously described, with the older 2408 drivers. Regards, Phil Muir P J Muir Productions Music And Audio Production URL: www.philmuir.com/ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gordon Kent" <dbmusic@xxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 2:45 PM Subject: [ddots-l] Re: MOTU WDM Drivers Are Better Than There ASIO Ones > Phil: > Which motu card do you have and which version of the driver are you using? > Gord > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Phil Muir" <ddots@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: <ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 8:15 AM > Subject: [ddots-l] Re: MOTU WDM Drivers Are Better Than There ASIO Ones > > >> Dan is right. You will need to give it a go, and see what happens. For some >> sound cards, ASIO, >> may well be a better choice than WDM. That used to be the case with MOTU >> ones. >> >> Regards, Phil Muir >> P J Muir Productions >> Music And Audio Production >> URL: >> www.philmuir.com/ >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Omar Binno" <omarbinno@xxxxxxxxx> >> To: <ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 10:56 AM >> Subject: [ddots-l] Re: MOTU WDM Drivers Are Better Than There ASIO Ones >> >> >>> Hi Phil: >>> >>> Is this applicable with any soundcard? If I'm using a delta 44, I should >>> also use the wdm driver >>> rather than the asio one? >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >>> Omar Binno >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Phil Muir" <ddots@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> To: <ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 3:34 AM >>> Subject: [ddots-l] MOTU WDM Drivers Are Better Than There ASIO Ones >>> >>> >>>> Hi all!! >>>> >>>> After a chance discussion with a friend on how good MOTU's WDM drivers >>>> are, I felt I should >>>> try using my MOTU soundcards WDM drivers, rather than the ASIO ones. >>>> Guess what, I have found >>>> there is 25% les CPU usage when using the WDM drivers, over the ASIO ones. >>>> I have also been >>>> able to significantly drop the buffers in the MOTU control panel too. >>>> >>>> Before, I was using the ASIO drivers and running with buffers in the >>>> control panel of 256. My >>>> CPU usage was around 30% on large projects. I then moved the buffer down >>>> to 64 and tested with >>>> the ASIO drivers. The CPU usage, jumped to around 76% and some crackling >>>> was occuring. So, >>>> just for fun, I changed from ASIO to WDM, reprofiled the card, and the CPU >>>> usage, jumped back >>>> to around 51%. Note: I have also found that every time you change the >>>> buffers in your sound >>>> cards external control panel that it is necessary to reprofile the cards >>>> WDM driver. I >>>> previously hadn't done this and because of the strange audio artifacts >>>> that I was hearing, had >>>> wrongly asumed that I had set the latency too low. In my case, I new this >>>> couldn't be right, >>>> as I had actually moved the buffers in the control panel from 64 to 128 >>>> and higher. >>>> >>>> Conclusion, use MOTU's WDM drivers, as they are much better written. >>>> >>>> Regards, Phil Muir >>>> P J Muir Productions >>>> Music And Audio Production >>>> URL: >>>> www.philmuir.com/ >>>> >>>> ** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:- >>>> ** [mailto:ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe] >>>> ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to: >>>> ** ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>> ** and in the Subject line type >>>> ** unsubscribe >>>> ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the >>>> ** immediately-following link:- >>>> ** [mailto:ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq] >>>> ** or send a message, to ** ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the >>>> Subject:- faq >>>> >>> >>> ** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:- >>> ** [mailto:ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe] >>> ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to: >>> ** ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> ** and in the Subject line type >>> ** unsubscribe >>> ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the >>> ** immediately-following link:- >>> ** [mailto:ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq] >>> ** or send a message, to ** ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the >>> Subject:- faq >>> >>> >> >> >> ** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:- >> ** [mailto:ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe] >> ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to: >> ** ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> ** and in the Subject line type >> ** unsubscribe >> ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the >> ** immediately-following link:- >> ** [mailto:ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq] >> ** or send a message, to ** ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- >> faq >> >> > ** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:- > ** [mailto:ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe] > ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to: > ** ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > ** and in the Subject line type > ** unsubscribe > ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the > ** immediately-following link:- > ** [mailto:ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq] > ** or send a message, to ** ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- > faq > > ** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe] ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to: ** ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ** and in the Subject line type ** unsubscribe ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the ** immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq] ** or send a message, to ** ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq