[csusbpeace] Re: PIC

  • From: Yasha Karant <ykarant@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: csusbpeace@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2021 21:25:41 -0800

Although the statement in the image defines "socialism" in terms of all sorts of services, the traditional definition of socialism encompasses many systems (I post an excerpt from Wikipedia below). Typically,modern Republiklans define socialism as any government provided goods or services to the general public (not welfare to the wealthy, including for-profit corporate subsidies that are subsequently converted to profit revenue stream to the for-profit entity, as with the development of COVID-19 vaccines) except for the military and police/prison systems (although most have no difficult with private for-profit prisons and other services under contract to the government and generating profit to the for-profit entities).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism

Socialism is a political, social, and economic philosophy encompassing a range of economic and social systems characterised by social ownership[1][2] of the means of production[3][4][5][6] and democratic control[7] or workers' self-management of enterprises.[8][9] It includes the political theories and movements associated with such systems.[10] Social ownership can be public, collective, cooperative, or of equity.[11] While no single definition encapsulates the many types of socialism,[12] social ownership is the one common element.[1][13][14] Socialists disagree about the degree to which social control or regulation of the economy is necessary, how far society should intervene and whether government, particularly existing government, is the correct vehicle for change.[15]

Socialist systems are divided into non-market and market forms.[16] Non-market socialism substitutes factor markets and money with integrated economic planning and engineering or technical criteria based on calculation performed in-kind, thereby producing a different economic mechanism that functions according to different economic laws and dynamics than those of capitalism.[17][18][19][20] A non-market socialist system eliminates the inefficiencies and crises traditionally associated with capital accumulation and the profit system in capitalism.[21][22][23][24] The socialist calculation debate, originated by the economic calculation problem,[25][26] concerns the feasibility and methods of resource allocation for a planned socialist system.[27][28][29] By contrast, market socialism retains the use of monetary prices, factor markets and in some cases the profit motive, with respect to the operation of socially owned enterprises and the allocation of capital goods between them. Profits generated by these firms would be controlled directly by the workforce of each firm or accrue to society at large in the form of a social dividend.[30][31][32] Anarchism and libertarian socialism oppose the use of the state as a means to establish socialism, favouring decentralisation above all, whether to establish non-market socialism or market socialism.[33][34]



On 3/5/21 9:13 PM, raccoon (Redacted sender bigraccoon1 for DMARC) wrote:





Also, never  call on the police or fire departments or call for any kind of military action because the military is 100% socialist. Also don't use public roads  and avoid all private business that is subsidized with taxpayer funds, such as airlines, auto manufacturing,  agriculture and  big pharma, including  vaccines.










Other related posts: