http://www.theatlantic.com/features/archive/2015/01/when-high-achievers-have-no-place-to-go/384451/ Also see comments below, posted to HUNTER-L (Hunter College faculty and staff listserv) by some well-known left/liberal faculty members. SJ > Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 16:57:00 +0000 > From: Sarah Chinn <sarah.chinn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Atlantic article on CUNY admissions > A terrific article that confirms what we have been noticing informally about changing patterns in enrollments at Hunter. > http://www.theatlantic.com/features/archive/2015/01/when-high-achievers-have-no-place-to-go/384451/ > > Sarah E. Chinn > Chair, English Department > Hunter College, CUNY > 695 Park Avenue > New York, NY 10065 > > sarah.chinn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > (212)772-5178 > > **************************************** > > Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 12:30:06 -0500 > From: Stuart Ewen <drstu@xxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Atlantic article on CUNY admissions > > Dear Sarah: > > Thanks for sharing this. The story reveals some of the bitter truths that > linger beneath the PR gloss that has shielded CUNY from serious criticism in > the age of Matt Goldstein and Benno Schmidt. > > Having taught at Hunter for 37 years, I’ve seen the unravelling of the > promise first hand. I hope others will pass on links to this article. > > Stuart > > > > Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 17:58:51 +0000 > From: Thomas Angotti <tangotti@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Atlantic article on CUNY admissions > > Sarah, Thanks for sharing this article. This is an issue we should be > addressing in our discussions among faculty and with students. It gets at > the heart of our mission. > Tom Angotti > > >**************************************** > ------------------------------ > > Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 19:56:13 +0000 > From: John R Wallach <jwallach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Atlantic article on CUNY admissions > > It's so sad to see how CUNY, once a leader in promoting equal educational > opportunity, has become a laggard; how efforts to produce greater > "excellence" are based on short-sighted estimates of students' abilities as > well as narrow, discredited metrics; how the leadership of the beacon of > public higher education in the country has kowtowed to private interests > instead of dedicating itself more fervently to raising more public money for > the university. But we have just enough diversity to look great on subway > ads! >