[cryptome] Re: cryptome Digest V2 #43
- From: Brynjar Fredriksen <bafbomb@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: cryptome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 11:08:15 -0700
Unsubscribe.
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 10:09 PM, FreeLists Mailing List Manager <
ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> ------------------------------------
> cryptome Digest Wed, 28 Aug 2013 Volume: 02 Issue: 043
>
> In This Issue:
> [cryptome] Re: Syria
> [cryptome] Re: Syria
> [cryptome] Re: Syria
> [cryptome] Re: Syria
> [cryptome] Re: Syria
> [cryptome] Re: Syria
> [cryptome] Re: Syria
> [cryptome] Re: Syria
> [cryptome] Re: Syria
> [cryptome] ***UNCHECKED*** Re: Re: Syria
> [cryptome] Verizon is a rogue provider
> [cryptome] Re: Syria
> [cryptome] Re: Syria
> [cryptome] Re: Verizon is a rogue provider
> [cryptome] Re: Syria
> [cryptome] Re: Syria
> [cryptome] Re: Syria
> [cryptome] Re: Syria
> [cryptome] Re: Syria
> [cryptome] Re: Syria
> [cryptome] Re: Syria
> [cryptome] Re: Syria
> [cryptome] Re: Syria
> [cryptome] Fw: Realtime air traffic & web attacks 90%
> increa
> [cryptome] Re: Fw: Realtime air traffic & web attacks 90%
> in
> [cryptome] Re: Fw: Realtime air traffic & web attacks 90%
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 09:37:33 +0100
> From: Peter Presland <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [cryptome] Re: Syria
>
> Its pretty clear why this list is being deserted in droves.
>
> Content monopolised by a Zionist shill, leading the crudulous and
> gullible by their noses - a microcosm of Mossad/Zionist domination of
> the US State itself in fact.
>
> It would be hilarious if it weren't so damned tragic.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 10:47:00 +0200
> From: Eugen Leitl <eugen@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [cryptome] Re: Syria
>
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 09:37:33AM +0100, Peter Presland wrote:
> > Its pretty clear why this list is being deserted in droves.
>
> Indeed; I was about to drop my subscription.
> Thanks for speaking up.
>
> > Content monopolised by a Zionist shill, leading the crudulous and
> > gullible by their noses - a microcosm of Mossad/Zionist domination of
> > the US State itself in fact.
> >
> > It would be hilarious if it weren't so damned tragic.
>
> Cypherpunks commit suicide by rejecting moderation.
> Too bad that being a square peg in a round hole is
> not limited to just domains where it is useful.
>
> Same thing with cryonicists, and transhumanists in
> general.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 01:51:23 -0700 (PDT)
> From: professor rat <pro2rat@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [cryptome] Re: Syria
>
> What about a daily limit? I could maybe handle three to five *Haim Baraks*
> a day - yr mileage etc
>
> ________________________________
> From: Eugen Leitl <eugen@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: cryptome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Wednesday, 28 August 2013 6:47 PM
> Subject: [cryptome] Re: Syria
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 09:37:33AM +0100, Peter Presland wrote:
> > Its pretty clear why this list is being deserted in droves.
>
> Indeed; I was about to drop my subscription.
> Thanks for speaking up.
>
> > Content monopolised by a Zionist shill, leading the crudulous and
> > gullible by their noses - a microcosm of Mossad/Zionist domination of
> > the US State itself in fact.
> >
> > It would be hilarious if it weren't so damned tragic.
>
> Cypherpunks commit suicide by rejecting moderation.
> Too bad that being a square peg in a round hole is
> not limited to just domains where it is useful.
>
> Same thing with cryonicists, and transhumanists in
> general.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> From: Shelley <shelley@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [cryptome] Re: Syria
> Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 02:52:38 -0700
>
> Hearing John Kerry blustering on in mock outrage, accusing the Syrian
> gov't of "using weapons against defenseless men, women and children"
> before having evidence of who was behind that particular attack-- when
> this country is guilty of the same, and much worse-- made me feel just
> as ill as it did when when the last administration lied us into two
> wars.
>
> Despite Kerry's bloviations, this is in part a dick-measuring contest.
> They haven't given a fuck about the horrors befalling the Syrian people
> for the past 2+ years. But Obama opened his big mouth and spewed
> threats about crossing a "red line" and now the USA's "credibility" (as
> if we had any. How they say this shit with a straight face is beyond me)
> is on the line.
>
> They also must knock the string of NSA scandals off the front page and
> stoke the Fear Factory. Each new Snowden disclosure exposes more lies
> and abuse, and shows them to be even more incompetent and corrupt than
> we already suspected.
>
> This is a rogue administration that has the same delusion of being above
> and beyond laws and international treaties and conventions as did the
> last idiot (but the current idiot is emboldened by his Nobel Peace
> Prize.)
>
> Excuse me while I go vomit up the irony.
>
>
> ----
>
> On Aug 27, 2013 10:03 PM, Kenneth Rasmusson <rasken@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> It's already a blatant war crime attacking with one singular Tomahawk.
> Here's ten crucial points to contemplate. They should suffice well for
> to understand that these types of acts are war crimes...
> http://tinyurl.com/kkjgu3s
>
> Kenneth Rasmusson
> Free Editor in Sweden
>
>
> 2013-08-28, Andrew Hornback wrote:
>
> Okay, let's say that we drop a couple of Tomahawks (which aren't cheap,
> since I'm thinking as a US taxpayer at this point) on a chemical weapons
> depot in Syria... causing the instantaneous release of those chemical
> weapons on the area surrounding the depot. Â While the initial attack is
> a 100% bullseye (hypothetically), the attack ends up killing or
> otherwise maiming 10,000 Syrian citizens. Â Is that not an act of
> aggression, bordering on an act of war, on the part of the United
> States?
>
> ------------------------------
>
> From: Shelley <shelley@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [cryptome] Re: Syria
> Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 02:53:39 -0700
>
> I'd rather not walk away from the whole list, so I just set an email
> filter to deliver his messages to the trash where they belong. Still
> have to read the dreck when he is quoted by others...
>
>
>
> ----
>
> On Aug 28, 2013 1:51 AM, professor rat <> wrote:
>
> What about a daily limit? I could maybe handle three to five *Haim
> Baraks* a day - yr mileage etc
>
> From: Eugen Leitl <> To: Sent:
> Wednesday, 28 August 2013 6:47 PM Subject: [cryptome] Re: Syria
>
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 09:37:33AM +0100, Peter Presland wrote:
> > Its pretty clear why this list is being deserted in droves.
>
> Indeed; I was about to drop my subscription. Thanks for speaking up.
>
> > Content monopolised by a Zionist shill, leading the crudulous and
> > gullible by their noses - a microcosm of Mossad/Zionist domination of
> > the US State itself in fact.
> >
> > It would be hilarious if it weren't so damned tragic.
>
> Cypherpunks commit suicide by rejecting moderation. Too bad that being a
> square peg in a round hole is not limited to just domains where it is
> useful.
>
> Same thing with cryonicists, and transhumanists in general.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 05:17:37 -0500
> Subject: [cryptome] Re: Syria
> From: Redmond <darkredptc@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Wow such a distaste for hiam. What are some other good lists?
> On Aug 28, 2013 4:53 AM, "Shelley" <shelley@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I'd rather not walk away from the whole list, so I just set an email
> > filter to deliver his messages to the trash where they belong. Still
> > have to read the dreck when he is quoted by others...
> >
> >
> >
> > ----
> >
> > On Aug 28, 2013 1:51 AM, professor rat <> wrote:
> >
> > What about a daily limit? I could maybe handle three to five *Haim
> > Baraks* a day - yr mileage etc
> >
> > From: Eugen Leitl <> To: Sent:
> > Wednesday, 28 August 2013 6:47 PM Subject: [cryptome] Re: Syria
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 09:37:33AM +0100, Peter Presland wrote:
> > > Its pretty clear why this list is being deserted in droves.
> >
> > Indeed; I was about to drop my subscription. Thanks for speaking up.
> >
> > > Content monopolised by a Zionist shill, leading the crudulous and
> > > gullible by their noses - a microcosm of Mossad/Zionist domination of
> > > the US State itself in fact.
> > >
> > > It would be hilarious if it weren't so damned tragic.
> >
> > Cypherpunks commit suicide by rejecting moderation. Too bad that being a
> > square peg in a round hole is not limited to just domains where it is
> > useful.
> >
> > Same thing with cryonicists, and transhumanists in general.
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 03:22:02 -0700 (PDT)
> From: professor rat <pro2rat@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [cryptome] Re: Syria
>
> I don't have any 'distaste' for anyone on the list. I just want to keep my
> Inbox reasonably manageable.
> Also am looking for good lists - would like to see a ' Marxmail latest
> 100' page for anarchists.
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Redmond <darkredptc@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: cryptome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Wednesday, 28 August 2013 8:17 PM
> Subject: [cryptome] Re: Syria
>
>
>
> Wow such a distaste for hiam. What are some other good lists?
> On Aug 28, 2013 4:53 AM, "Shelley" <shelley@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I'd rather not walk away from the whole list, so I just set an email
> >filter to deliver his messages to the trash where they belong. Still
> >have to read the dreck when he is quoted by others...
> >
> >
> >
> >----
> >
> >On Aug 28, 2013 1:51 AM, professor rat <> wrote:
> >
> >What about a daily limit? I could maybe handle three to five *Haim
> >Baraks* a day - yr mileage etc
> >
> >From: Eugen Leitl <> To: Sent:
> >Wednesday, 28 August 2013 6:47 PM Subject: [cryptome] Re: Syria
> >
> >On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 09:37:33AM +0100, Peter Presland wrote:
> >> Its pretty clear why this list is being deserted in droves.
> >
> >Indeed; I was about to drop my subscription. Thanks for speaking up.
> >
> >> Content monopolised by a Zionist shill, leading the crudulous and
> >> gullible by their noses - a microcosm of Mossad/Zionist domination of
> >> the US State itself in fact.
> >>
> >> It would be hilarious if it weren't so damned tragic.
> >
> >Cypherpunks commit suicide by rejecting moderation. Too bad that being a
> >square peg in a round hole is not limited to just domains where it is
> >useful.
> >
> >Same thing with cryonicists, and transhumanists in general.
> >
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 03:31:01 -0700
> From: Shelley <shelley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [cryptome] Re: Syria
>
> Cryptome is a good list.
> I wouldn't even have said anything but I didn't want to see someone like
> Eugen unsubscribe because of his recent 30+ posts/day.
>
> Fyi: I originally set that filter a while ago, when he was embedding large
> photos that crashed my mobile email client.
>
>
> ----
> On Aug 28, 2013 3:17 AM, Redmond <darkredptc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Wow such a distaste for hiam. What are some other good lists?
> On Aug 28, 2013 4:53 AM, "Shelley" <shelley@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'd rather not walk away from the whole list, so I just set an email
>
> filter to deliver his messages to the trash where they belong. Still
>
> have to read the dreck when he is quoted by others...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----
>
>
>
> On Aug 28, 2013 1:51 AM, professor rat <> wrote:
>
>
>
> What about a daily limit? I could maybe handle three to five *Haim
>
> Baraks* a day - yr mileage etc
>
>
>
> From: Eugen Leitl <> To: Sent:
>
> Wednesday, 28 August 2013 6:47 PM Subject: [cryptome] Re: Syria
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 09:37:33AM +0100, Peter Presland wrote:
>
> > Its pretty clear why this list is being deserted in droves.
>
>
>
> Indeed; I was about to drop my subscription. Thanks for speaking up.
>
>
>
> > Content monopolised by a Zionist shill, leading the crudulous and
>
> > gullible by their noses - a microcosm of Mossad/Zionist domination of
>
> > the US State itself in fact.
>
> >
>
> > It would be hilarious if it weren't so damned tragic.
>
>
>
> Cypherpunks commit suicide by rejecting moderation. Too bad that being a
>
> square peg in a round hole is not limited to just domains where it is
>
> useful.
>
>
>
> Same thing with cryonicists, and transhumanists in general.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 05:35:53 -0500
> Subject: [cryptome] Re: Syria
> From: Redmond <darkredptc@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> In that case check lists.riseup.net they have some anarchist related
> lists.
> I misunderstood the bit about hiam, its late I apologize.
> On Aug 28, 2013 5:22 AM, "professor rat" <pro2rat@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I don't have any 'distaste' for anyone on the list. I just want to keep
> my
> > Inbox reasonably manageable.
> >
> > Also am looking for good lists - would like to see a ' Marxmail latest
> > 100' page for anarchists.
> >
> > ------------------------------
> > *From:* Redmond <darkredptc@xxxxxxxxx>
> > *To:* cryptome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > *Sent:* Wednesday, 28 August 2013 8:17 PM
> > *Subject:* [cryptome] Re: Syria
> >
> > Wow such a distaste for hiam. What are some other good lists?
> > On Aug 28, 2013 4:53 AM, "Shelley" <shelley@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > I'd rather not walk away from the whole list, so I just set an email
> > filter to deliver his messages to the trash where they belong. Still
> > have to read the dreck when he is quoted by others...
> >
> >
> >
> > ----
> >
> > On Aug 28, 2013 1:51 AM, professor rat <> wrote:
> >
> > What about a daily limit? I could maybe handle three to five *Haim
> > Baraks* a day - yr mileage etc
> >
> > From: Eugen Leitl <> To: Sent:
> > Wednesday, 28 August 2013 6:47 PM Subject: [cryptome] Re: Syria
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 09:37:33AM +0100, Peter Presland wrote:
> > > Its pretty clear why this list is being deserted in droves.
> >
> > Indeed; I was about to drop my subscription. Thanks for speaking up.
> >
> > > Content monopolised by a Zionist shill, leading the crudulous and
> > > gullible by their noses - a microcosm of Mossad/Zionist domination of
> > > the US State itself in fact.
> > >
> > > It would be hilarious if it weren't so damned tragic.
> >
> > Cypherpunks commit suicide by rejecting moderation. Too bad that being a
> > square peg in a round hole is not limited to just domains where it is
> > useful.
> >
> > Same thing with cryonicists, and transhumanists in general.
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 12:30:32 +0100
> From: bz <beacyk@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [cryptome] ***UNCHECKED*** Re: Re: Syria
>
> Version: 1
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 15:37:35 +0300
> From: In Harms Way <11414150173@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [cryptome] Verizon is a rogue provider
>
> Cooperating with GCHQ
> <
> http://electrospaces.blogspot.com/2013/08/nsa-has-also-arrangements-with-foreign.html
> >
> is also Verizon Business (codenamed DACRON). GCHQ has clandestine
> agreements with Verizon, described in one document as "intercept
> partner", in order to give the agency access to their network of
> undersea cables.
>
> But it seems not to be just the access which is provided. We have
> received reliable information that Verizon is now also targeting human
> rights and peace as well as environmental activist groups by
> intercepting their mails of certain lists sent to subscribers who are
> e-mail account holders @verizon.net and tags the senders as spammers.
> Such intercepts and false tagging has been termed illegal by a ruling by
> the Highest Court of the European Council, but as US-American company
> Verizon appears to give a damn and even blocks then the complaints
> communications with Verizon by bluntly stating: ".... that e-mail from
> your IP address will not be allowed access to the Verizon Online e-mail
> domain due to one or more of the following reasons: Your IP has been
> blocked because of spam issues or because your ISP indicates that it is
> dynamically assigned."
>
> Subscribed account holders @verizon.net could only be informed and
> warned about this abuse applied by Verizon by using a disguised sender,
> different static IP and going through a different route, but then that
> e-mail might again be intercepted, since the content is sent unencrypted.
>
> Does anyone on the cryptome-list have further insights on Verizon?
> Suggestions are required and kindly requested on how activist groups
> shall handle such intercepts and blocks by VERIZON.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 09:10:29 -0400
> Subject: [cryptome] Re: Syria
> From: Haim Barak <haim357@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Well, I understood but no one has brought a solution Sometimes the truth
> hurts to criticize it's easy to find solution for this conflict it is very
> hard,,,,
>
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 6:35 AM, Redmond <darkredptc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > In that case check lists.riseup.net they have some anarchist related
> > lists. I misunderstood the bit about hiam, its late I apologize.
> > On Aug 28, 2013 5:22 AM, "professor rat" <pro2rat@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> I don't have any 'distaste' for anyone on the list. I just want to keep
> >> my Inbox reasonably manageable.
> >>
> >> Also am looking for good lists - would like to see a ' Marxmail latest
> >> 100' page for anarchists.
> >>
> >> ------------------------------
> >> *From:* Redmond <darkredptc@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> *To:* cryptome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> *Sent:* Wednesday, 28 August 2013 8:17 PM
> >> *Subject:* [cryptome] Re: Syria
> >>
> >> Wow such a distaste for hiam. What are some other good lists?
> >> On Aug 28, 2013 4:53 AM, "Shelley" <shelley@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> I'd rather not walk away from the whole list, so I just set an email
> >> filter to deliver his messages to the trash where they belong. Still
> >> have to read the dreck when he is quoted by others...
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ----
> >>
> >> On Aug 28, 2013 1:51 AM, professor rat <> wrote:
> >>
> >> What about a daily limit? I could maybe handle three to five *Haim
> >> Baraks* a day - yr mileage etc
> >>
> >> From: Eugen Leitl <> To: Sent:
> >> Wednesday, 28 August 2013 6:47 PM Subject: [cryptome] Re: Syria
> >>
> >> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 09:37:33AM +0100, Peter Presland wrote:
> >> > Its pretty clear why this list is being deserted in droves.
> >>
> >> Indeed; I was about to drop my subscription. Thanks for speaking up.
> >>
> >> > Content monopolised by a Zionist shill, leading the crudulous and
> >> > gullible by their noses - a microcosm of Mossad/Zionist domination of
> >> > the US State itself in fact.
> >> >
> >> > It would be hilarious if it weren't so damned tragic.
> >>
> >> Cypherpunks commit suicide by rejecting moderation. Too bad that being a
> >> square peg in a round hole is not limited to just domains where it is
> >> useful.
> >>
> >> Same thing with cryonicists, and transhumanists in general.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>
> --
>
> Haim Barak
> To Serve and Protect Our Community
> In God We Trust
> Israel#: 5353...
> Email: haim357@xxxxxxxxx
> Skype: haim.357
> http://haim357.wordpress.com/
>
>
> <http://haim357.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/banner.jpg>
>
> This e-mail is intended only for the named recipient(s) and may contain
> information that is privileged, confidential and/or exempt from
> disclosure under applicable law. No waiver of privilege, confidence or
> otherwise is intended by virtue of communication via the Internet. Any
> unauthorized use, dissemination or copying is strictly prohibited.
> Thank you.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 10:44:50 -0400
> From: John Young <jya@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [cryptome] Re: Syria
>
> NYT has a grotesque op-ed today arguing for violation
> of law to slaughter Syrians written by a political science
> professor, who else confects appropriately biblical
> armageddon scripture to god-bless evil deeds on
> behalf of perdurable "victims" who must be illegally
> killed to save the political career of the legal killers.
>
> The NYT website is down at the moment. We'll
> scan the hardcopy and put on Cryptome.
>
> The Op-Ed is a perfect example of defense grant
> educational prostitution employing obligatory potty
> language most likely to instigate rape of victims rather
> then give a shit about them.
>
> Haim and anyone open to calm deliberation, pray you
> read this machinic-viral manure for its lesson of what not
> to spread here nor anywhere or be branded a complete
> media sucker.
>
> To repeat my mea culpa, been there done that as an Army
> recruit. Then learned the hard way how dedicated the Army
> is to turning patriots into featherbedding cuckoos braying
> about the need for war insanity over any sane alternative.
> Not a single training coure taught peace except as a
> deception to break morale and warfighting spirit "the
> commies are everywhere, bars, hotels, universities,
> lovers, families at home most vulnerable."
>
> The military shuts down independent thought to produce
> monomaniacal killers in obedience to higher commanders
> who place their allegiance to higher commanders above
> civilian accountability, will in fact slaughter civilians who
> have the misfortune to be imperceptible to cold-blooded
> machinic targeting algorithms. Collateral damage is now
> ubiquitious not exceptional, the laws of war are well
> behind technology, deliberately so, according the
> professor of political science angling for a distinguished
> featherbed in highest education, I mean for eternity.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 11:01:18 -0400
> From: John Young <jya@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [cryptome] Re: Verizon is a rogue provider
>
> We have received a number of complaints about Verizon
> IP addresses intruding on SM accounts and other fora.
> Might be spoofs or bare-assed intimidation operations
> now that Verizon and others have been outed.
> It could be helpful to counterspy by logging intrusions
> and intercepts, compiling and publishing them to help
> educate the public on the viral spying disease spread.
>
> If lacking your own platform Crytome will publish compilations
> with or without attribution. If sent to Cryptome be sure to
> cloak carefully, even if that is as silly as internet empowerment
> against authority.
>
>
>
> At 08:37 AM 8/28/2013, you wrote:
>
> ><
> http://electrospaces.blogspot.com/2013/08/nsa-has-also-arrangements-with-foreign.html
> >Cooperating
> >with GCHQ is also Verizon Business (codenamed DACRON). GCHQ has
> >clandestine agreements with Verizon, described in one document as
> >"intercept partner", in order to give the agency access to their
> >network of undersea cables.
> >
> >But it seems not to be just the access which is provided. We have
> >received reliable information that Verizon is now also targeting
> >human rights and peace as well as environmental activist groups by
> >intercepting their mails of certain lists sent to subscribers who
> >are e-mail account holders @verizon.net and tags the senders as spammers.
> >Such intercepts and false tagging has been termed illegal by a
> >ruling by the Highest Court of the European Council, but as
> >US-American company Verizon appears to give a damn and even blocks
> >then the complaints communications with Verizon by bluntly stating:
> >".... that e-mail from your IP address will not be allowed access to
> >the Verizon Online e-mail domain due to one or more of the following
> >reasons: Your IP has been blocked because of spam issues or because
> >your ISP indicates that it is dynamically assigned."
> >
> >Subscribed account holders @verizon.net could only be informed and
> >warned about this abuse applied by Verizon by using a disguised
> >sender, different static IP and going through a different route, but
> >then that e-mail might again be intercepted, since the content is
> >sent unencrypted.
> >
> >Does anyone on the cryptome-list have further insights on Verizon?
> >Suggestions are required and kindly requested on how activist groups
> >shall handle such intercepts and blocks by VERIZON.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 11:05:31 -0400
> From: John Young <jya@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [cryptome] Re: Syria
>
> NYTimes alternate web site has the grotesque Op-Ed:
>
>
> http://news.nytco.com/2013/08/28/opinion/bomb-syria-even-if-it-is-illegal.html?from=opinion
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 11:21:55 -0400
> From: John Young <jya@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [cryptome] Re: Syria
>
> Eugen rightly notes cypherpunks maillist suicide from lack of
> moderation. Much debate about that back then. Led to several
> offshoots to provide laundered postings. Most of those eventually
> died from moderator burn-out. A couple were re-born becoming
> adult-like juveniles behaving far too soberly to merit vote rigging
> rights, and lately the old-drunk cypherpunks itself is struggling to
> break free of its bodysnatched membrane.
>
> Its run by a gaggle of "paid informants (r)", like our exemplary
> CJ here under unlaundered cover, in emulation of the originals
> who have retired on their government pensions for dual-use
> technology generously rewarded under dual-purpose hoodwinking.
> Or in jail which is superior acommodation to coastal think tanks.
>
> One benefit of being a "fucking moderator" or best, "Mange,"
> (thanks CJ) is moving up the greasy pole to better dole. But
> a moderator has to allow shit to happen or there's no bitching
> thus no appeal thus no subbing and unsubbing and thence
> doomed to massively buying sock puppet followers on Twitter.
>
> Eugen will vanish up his own asshole if lists dwindle, and we
> will become less informed by his sagacious spam, forced
> immigration to to plain old fishwrap burgeoned ads for
> erectile disfunction and crotch shot dancers.
>
> One vote for Eugen, one vote for Haim, one vote for everyone
> dead or alive. Rig them votes, sock them puppets.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 11:23:02 -0500
> From: Gary Wallin <garylwallin@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [cryptome] Re: Syria
>
> On 8/28/2013 10:05 AM, John Young wrote:
> > NYTimes alternate web site has the grotesque Op-Ed:
> >
> >
> http://news.nytco.com/2013/08/28/opinion/bomb-syria-even-if-it-is-illegal.html?from=opinion
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > .
> >
> I guess today is another day in the long line of "_/*I Have a
> Nightmare*/_" alternate Martin Luther King realities. Fifty years and
> this is the best our dreams can produce.
> Everyone is too busy hacking, spamming, and spinning. Even the "SEA", or
> is it just another NSA false flag operation.
>
> --
> http://boingboing.net/2013/08/27/syrian-electronic-army-boa.html#more-252598
>
>
>
> All my email is subject to viewing by the Panopticon ::
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panopticon ::
> Except in the imaginations of the netizens there is no real secrecy or
> privacy on the Internets. The powers that be have been elevated to lofty
> positions of near omnipresence. Enjoy, adapt, and survive.
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 13:42:52 -0400
> Subject: [cryptome] Re: Syria
> From: Andrew Hornback <achornback@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Pardon me, but this is a little long, my response to the Op-Ed:
> "... to deter further massacres" - that's code for let's crank up the
> violence machine.
>
> What does it honestly matter if someone is killed by the Swine Flu, a .45
> round, a chemical agent, a nuclear blast or a laser-guided 500 pounder?
> End result is that they're still dead. This kind of attack is sending the
> wrong message in that it's perfectly fine with us (i.e. the US) if you want
> to execute your citizens, but once you get into the "bad" weapons, you need
> your hands smacked by way of an escalation of violence and additional
> killing.
>
> "... moral reasons for disregarding the law" - Does that mean that we can
> disregard the sovereignty of other nations? On the flip side, does that
> mean that they can disregard the sovereignty of our nation? How would we
> feel about another country (or external NGO) commiting an attack on US soil
> because they have a difference of opinion about things like abortion or the
> death penalty? That's quite the can of worms you've got there.
>
> I think it's quite obvious that Kerry (and his State Department) is a rube
> here - the only reason he became Secretary of State was because Obama
> needed someone who could find the Middle East on a Mercator projection map
> while Hillary went off, got some rest, worked on her tan and prepped for
> 2016.
>
> Discussion as to what rules and international treaties Syria is bound is
> garbage. What realistically can we use them for in this situation?
> Capture Assad, bring him before the Hague and let them issue 5 slaps with
> a wet noodle? Or maybe simply look upon Syria with disdain for a period of
> 20 years? Let's get real here. This legal basis blathering is simply a
> way for those opposed to any form of action to get their warm and fuzzy
> about going in because of a "legal mandate" and after all, doesn't the
> United States stand for "Truth, Justice and the American Way" ?
> Propaganda, pure and simple.
>
> I love how Mr. Hurd brings in the idea of how Syria isn't party to the CWC
> of 1993 but then turns around and uses that a a barbed stick to poke at
> both the US and Russia. What good does that really serve? More smoke and
> mirrors. And follows that by bringing in the Geneva Convention in order to
> blacken the eye of the UN Security Council.
>
> “from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or
> political independence of any state.” - So, states have to sit idly by and
> let things happen as long as the actions of another state don't interfere
> in their own sovereignty, a form of forced non-interference. That makes
> pretty good sense - let countries take care of themselves, don't interfere
> and prepare to defend yourself.
>
> The eerie thing gets into "responsibility to protect" - who's responsible
> to protect whom? At the rate things are going in the US, are the American
> people going to ask other countries to protect us from our own government?
> Wouldn't that be wild.
>
> Then we get into the discussion about NATO in Kosovo and how the action was
> illegal but legitimate. I'm not a lawyer here, no fin on this back, but
> just what can the UN Security Council do to NATO? Levy fines (who funds
> the UN and NATO again?) ? Stern looks? Again, it's smoke and mirrors.
>
> As the final move, Mr. Hurd seems to think that the allies (essentially
> NATO) should declare that international law has evolved and that the
> Security Council doesn't matter any longer. Take a minute to let that sink
> in, especially "the Security Council doesn't matter any longer". At that
> point, honestly, they've destroyed the credibility of the United Nations.
> What's the next step, disband the UN? I'm sure that would make some folks
> very happy (anarchists, for example), but that brings a whole new exponent
> to the amount of chaos going on in the world, in my opinion.
>
> And this writer teaches political science? Am I ever glad that I stuck
> with engineering and computer science.
>
> --- A
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:05 AM, John Young <jya@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > NYTimes alternate web site has the grotesque Op-Ed:
> >
> > http://news.nytco.com/2013/08/**28/opinion/bomb-syria-even-if-**
> > it-is-illegal.html?from=**opinion<
> http://news.nytco.com/2013/08/28/opinion/bomb-syria-even-if-it-is-illegal.html?from=opinion
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 10:55:43 -0700
> Subject: [cryptome] Re: Syria
> From: coderman <coderman@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 8:21 AM, John Young <jya@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > ...
> > One vote for Eugen, one vote for Haim, one vote for everyone
> > dead or alive. Rig them votes, sock them puppets.
>
>
> everyone who is seemingly stymied by mail filters, deferring their
> input evaluation to third party "moderators", is a lazy lout or
> negligent nincompoop!
>
> your personal responsibility upon joining any list is to evaluate the
> origin and content of received communications and apply filters or
> mute accordingly.
>
> do not shirk this responsibility to others, lest the blinders and echo
> chamber cripple mind...
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 14:10:31 -0400
> Subject: [cryptome] Re: Syria
> From: Haim Barak <haim357@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thank you ,No words to thank the interpretation,,,,,
>
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 1:55 PM, coderman <coderman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 8:21 AM, John Young <jya@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > ...
> > > One vote for Eugen, one vote for Haim, one vote for everyone
> > > dead or alive. Rig them votes, sock them puppets.
> >
> >
> > everyone who is seemingly stymied by mail filters, deferring their
> > input evaluation to third party "moderators", is a lazy lout or
> > negligent nincompoop!
> >
> > your personal responsibility upon joining any list is to evaluate the
> > origin and content of received communications and apply filters or
> > mute accordingly.
> >
> > do not shirk this responsibility to others, lest the blinders and echo
> > chamber cripple mind...
> >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> Haim Barak
> To Serve and Protect Our Community
> In God We Trust
> Israel#: 5353...
> Email: haim357@xxxxxxxxx
> Skype: haim.357
> http://haim357.wordpress.com/
>
>
> <http://haim357.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/banner.jpg>
>
> This e-mail is intended only for the named recipient(s) and may contain
> information that is privileged, confidential and/or exempt from
> disclosure under applicable law. No waiver of privilege, confidence or
> otherwise is intended by virtue of communication via the Internet. Any
> unauthorized use, dissemination or copying is strictly prohibited.
> Thank you.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 14:37:57 -0400
> Subject: [cryptome] Re: Syria
> From: Haim Barak <haim357@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> a military attack Assad's regime for its use of chemical weapons against
> its citizens.
> Administration official confirmed that the U.S. is at the point of no
> return, as he put it, with regard to the attack itself, he said the timing
> has not yet been determined.
> The evening ended with emergency session of the Security Council of the UN
> on whether to accept the British proposal and approve military action
> against Syria. Before the debate ended unofficial representatives left
> Russia and China the place to protest the intent to attack Assad's regime.
>
> Tonight reported further that Turkey has raised the security alert
> level. Network
> to the Arab - reported today that the Syrian government cleared a key
> government institutions and security were considered potential targets for
> attack. Among other things, turns the base of the fourth division of the
> Syrian army, at Jabel Ksion Damascus.
>
> Defense believe that Israel will remain out of the picture. Netanyahu asked
> ministers not "chatter" in the media. Limited statements from the chief of
> staff and defense minister were coordinated with the prime minister. Comes
> to warning messages Syrian rocket attacks on Israel.
> Condition imposed on Israel: Although we are not in the picture, but
> because the world decided to punish the Syrians, we are supposed to be on
> the line for them.
> I would like to see the U.S. reaction, the English and the French, if the
> Syrians were threatening them with missiles on their heads if they Iitkifo
> them, and we suffer because of it.
>
> I wonder what was public opinion in the U.S., England and France, if that
> were the face of things.
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Haim Barak <haim357@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Thank you ,No words to thank the interpretation,,,,,
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 1:55 PM, coderman <coderman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 8:21 AM, John Young <jya@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > ...
> >> > One vote for Eugen, one vote for Haim, one vote for everyone
> >> > dead or alive. Rig them votes, sock them puppets.
> >>
> >>
> >> everyone who is seemingly stymied by mail filters, deferring their
> >> input evaluation to third party "moderators", is a lazy lout or
> >> negligent nincompoop!
> >>
> >> your personal responsibility upon joining any list is to evaluate the
> >> origin and content of received communications and apply filters or
> >> mute accordingly.
> >>
> >> do not shirk this responsibility to others, lest the blinders and echo
> >> chamber cripple mind...
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Haim Barak
> > To Serve and Protect Our Community
> > In God We Trust
> > Israel#: 5353...
> > Email: haim357@xxxxxxxxx
> > Skype: haim.357
> > http://haim357.wordpress.com/
> >
> >
> > <http://haim357.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/banner.jpg>
> >
> > This e-mail is intended only for the named recipient(s) and may contain
> > information that is privileged, confidential and/or exempt from
> > disclosure under applicable law. No waiver of privilege, confidence or
> > otherwise is intended by virtue of communication via the Internet. Any
> > unauthorized use, dissemination or copying is strictly prohibited.
> > Thank you.
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Haim Barak
> To Serve and Protect Our Community
> In God We Trust
> Israel#: 5353...
> Email: haim357@xxxxxxxxx
> Skype: haim.357
> http://haim357.wordpress.com/
>
>
> <http://haim357.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/banner.jpg>
>
> This e-mail is intended only for the named recipient(s) and may contain
> information that is privileged, confidential and/or exempt from
> disclosure under applicable law. No waiver of privilege, confidence or
> otherwise is intended by virtue of communication via the Internet. Any
> unauthorized use, dissemination or copying is strictly prohibited.
> Thank you.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 14:43:49 -0400
> Subject: [cryptome] Re: Syria
> From: Haim Barak <haim357@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> https://twitter.com/ZonedSecurity/status/372772194645856256
>
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Haim Barak <haim357@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Obama administration official confirmed that a final decision is to go
> > to a military attack Assad's regime for its use of chemical weapons
> against
> > its citizens.
> > Administration official confirmed that the U.S. is at the point of no
> > return, as he put it, with regard to the attack itself, he said the
> timing
> > has not yet been determined.
> >
> > The evening ended with emergency session of the Security Council of the
> UN
> > on whether to accept the British proposal and approve military action
> > against Syria. Before the debate ended unofficial representatives left
> > Russia and China the place to protest the intent to attack Assad's
> regime.
> >
> > Tonight reported further that Turkey has raised the security alert
> level. Network
> > to the Arab - reported today that the Syrian government cleared a key
> > government institutions and security were considered potential targets
> for
> > attack. Among other things, turns the base of the fourth division of the
> > Syrian army, at Jabel Ksion Damascus.
> >
> > Defense believe that Israel will remain out of the picture. Netanyahu
> > asked ministers not "chatter" in the media. Limited statements from the
> > chief of staff and defense minister were coordinated with the prime
> > minister. Comes to warning messages Syrian rocket attacks on Israel.
> > Condition imposed on Israel: Although we are not in the picture, but
> > because the world decided to punish the Syrians, we are supposed to be on
> > the line for them.
> > I would like to see the U.S. reaction, the English and the French, if the
> > Syrians were threatening them with missiles on their heads if they
> Iitkifo
> > them, and we suffer because of it.
> >
> > I wonder what was public opinion in the U.S., England and France, if that
> > were the face of things.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Haim Barak <haim357@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> Thank you ,No words to thank the interpretation,,,,,
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 1:55 PM, coderman <coderman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 8:21 AM, John Young <jya@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>> > ...
> >>> > One vote for Eugen, one vote for Haim, one vote for everyone
> >>> > dead or alive. Rig them votes, sock them puppets.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> everyone who is seemingly stymied by mail filters, deferring their
> >>> input evaluation to third party "moderators", is a lazy lout or
> >>> negligent nincompoop!
> >>>
> >>> your personal responsibility upon joining any list is to evaluate the
> >>> origin and content of received communications and apply filters or
> >>> mute accordingly.
> >>>
> >>> do not shirk this responsibility to others, lest the blinders and echo
> >>> chamber cripple mind...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> Haim Barak
> >> To Serve and Protect Our Community
> >> In God We Trust
> >> Israel#: 5353...
> >> Email: haim357@xxxxxxxxx
> >> Skype: haim.357
> >> http://haim357.wordpress.com/
> >>
> >>
> >> <http://haim357.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/banner.jpg>
> >>
> >> This e-mail is intended only for the named recipient(s) and may contain
> >> information that is privileged, confidential and/or exempt from
> >> disclosure under applicable law. No waiver of privilege, confidence or
> >> otherwise is intended by virtue of communication via the Internet. Any
> >> unauthorized use, dissemination or copying is strictly prohibited.
> >> Thank you.
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Haim Barak
> > To Serve and Protect Our Community
> > In God We Trust
> > Israel#: 5353...
> > Email: haim357@xxxxxxxxx
> > Skype: haim.357
> > http://haim357.wordpress.com/
> >
> >
> > <http://haim357.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/banner.jpg>
> >
> > This e-mail is intended only for the named recipient(s) and may contain
> > information that is privileged, confidential and/or exempt from
> > disclosure under applicable law. No waiver of privilege, confidence or
> > otherwise is intended by virtue of communication via the Internet. Any
> > unauthorized use, dissemination or copying is strictly prohibited.
> > Thank you.
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Haim Barak
> To Serve and Protect Our Community
> In God We Trust
> Israel#: 5353...
> Email: haim357@xxxxxxxxx
> Skype: haim.357
> http://haim357.wordpress.com/
>
>
> <http://haim357.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/banner.jpg>
>
> This e-mail is intended only for the named recipient(s) and may contain
> information that is privileged, confidential and/or exempt from
> disclosure under applicable law. No waiver of privilege, confidence or
> otherwise is intended by virtue of communication via the Internet. Any
> unauthorized use, dissemination or copying is strictly prohibited.
> Thank you.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 14:45:21 -0400
> Subject: [cryptome] Re: Syria
> From: Haim Barak <haim357@xxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> http://news.softpedia.com/news/Melbourne-IT-Blog-Hacked-and-Defaced-by-Syrian-Electronic-Army-378830.shtml
>
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Haim Barak <haim357@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > https://twitter.com/ZonedSecurity/status/372772194645856256
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Haim Barak <haim357@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> Obama administration official confirmed that a final decision is to go
> >> to a military attack Assad's regime for its use of chemical weapons
> against
> >> its citizens.
> >> Administration official confirmed that the U.S. is at the point of no
> >> return, as he put it, with regard to the attack itself, he said the
> timing
> >> has not yet been determined.
> >>
> >> The evening ended with emergency session of the Security Council of the
> >> UN on whether to accept the British proposal and approve military action
> >> against Syria. Before the debate ended unofficial representatives left
> >> Russia and China the place to protest the intent to attack Assad's
> regime.
> >>
> >> Tonight reported further that Turkey has raised the security alert
> level. Network
> >> to the Arab - reported today that the Syrian government cleared a key
> >> government institutions and security were considered potential targets
> for
> >> attack. Among other things, turns the base of the fourth division of the
> >> Syrian army, at Jabel Ksion Damascus.
> >>
> >> Defense believe that Israel will remain out of the picture. Netanyahu
> >> asked ministers not "chatter" in the media. Limited statements from the
> >> chief of staff and defense minister were coordinated with the prime
> >> minister. Comes to warning messages Syrian rocket attacks on Israel.
> >> Condition imposed on Israel: Although we are not in the picture, but
> >> because the world decided to punish the Syrians, we are supposed to be
> on
> >> the line for them.
> >> I would like to see the U.S. reaction, the English and the French, if
> the
> >> Syrians were threatening them with missiles on their heads if they
> Iitkifo
> >> them, and we suffer because of it.
> >>
> >> I wonder what was public opinion in the U.S., England and France, if
> that
> >> were the face of things.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Haim Barak <haim357@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Thank you ,No words to thank the interpretation,,,,,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 1:55 PM, coderman <coderman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 8:21 AM, John Young <jya@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>> > ...
> >>>> > One vote for Eugen, one vote for Haim, one vote for everyone
> >>>> > dead or alive. Rig them votes, sock them puppets.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> everyone who is seemingly stymied by mail filters, deferring their
> >>>> input evaluation to third party "moderators", is a lazy lout or
> >>>> negligent nincompoop!
> >>>>
> >>>> your personal responsibility upon joining any list is to evaluate the
> >>>> origin and content of received communications and apply filters or
> >>>> mute accordingly.
> >>>>
> >>>> do not shirk this responsibility to others, lest the blinders and echo
> >>>> chamber cripple mind...
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>>
> >>> Haim Barak
> >>> To Serve and Protect Our Community
> >>> In God We Trust
> >>> Israel#: 5353...
> >>> Email: haim357@xxxxxxxxx
> >>> Skype: haim.357
> >>> http://haim357.wordpress.com/
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> <http://haim357.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/banner.jpg>
> >>>
> >>> This e-mail is intended only for the named recipient(s) and may contain
> >>> information that is privileged, confidential and/or exempt from
> >>> disclosure under applicable law. No waiver of privilege, confidence or
> >>> otherwise is intended by virtue of communication via the Internet. Any
> >>> unauthorized use, dissemination or copying is strictly prohibited.
> >>> Thank you.
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> Haim Barak
> >> To Serve and Protect Our Community
> >> In God We Trust
> >> Israel#: 5353...
> >> Email: haim357@xxxxxxxxx
> >> Skype: haim.357
> >> http://haim357.wordpress.com/
> >>
> >>
> >> <http://haim357.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/banner.jpg>
> >>
> >> This e-mail is intended only for the named recipient(s) and may contain
> >> information that is privileged, confidential and/or exempt from
> >> disclosure under applicable law. No waiver of privilege, confidence or
> >> otherwise is intended by virtue of communication via the Internet. Any
> >> unauthorized use, dissemination or copying is strictly prohibited.
> >> Thank you.
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Haim Barak
> > To Serve and Protect Our Community
> > In God We Trust
> > Israel#: 5353...
> > Email: haim357@xxxxxxxxx
> > Skype: haim.357
> > http://haim357.wordpress.com/
> >
> >
> > <http://haim357.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/banner.jpg>
> >
> > This e-mail is intended only for the named recipient(s) and may contain
> > information that is privileged, confidential and/or exempt from
> > disclosure under applicable law. No waiver of privilege, confidence or
> > otherwise is intended by virtue of communication via the Internet. Any
> > unauthorized use, dissemination or copying is strictly prohibited.
> > Thank you.
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Haim Barak
> To Serve and Protect Our Community
> In God We Trust
> Israel#: 5353...
> Email: haim357@xxxxxxxxx
> Skype: haim.357
> http://haim357.wordpress.com/
>
>
> <http://haim357.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/banner.jpg>
>
> This e-mail is intended only for the named recipient(s) and may contain
> information that is privileged, confidential and/or exempt from
> disclosure under applicable law. No waiver of privilege, confidence or
> otherwise is intended by virtue of communication via the Internet. Any
> unauthorized use, dissemination or copying is strictly prohibited.
> Thank you.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 13:57:17 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Brian Hecht <brian.hecht@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [cryptome] Fw: Realtime air traffic & web attacks 90% increase
>
>
> U.S. Web Attacks Skyrocket Ahead of Mid East Action: 89.8% Above Normal
> *Real Time Heat Map*
> According
> to Akamai, which monitors global internet conditions, the United States
> is experiencing a surge in web attacks today, clocking in at 90% above
> normal.
>
>
> http://www.akamai.com/html/technology/dataviz1.html
>
> Real Time Air Traffic .. zoom in on Cyprus and Syria
>
> http://planefinder.net/
>
>
> ----- Forwarded Message -----
> From: Brian Hecht <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "cryptome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <cryptome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2013 3:05 PM
> Subject: Re: [cryptome] Re: Syria -artcile on The Voice of Russia
>
>
>
>
>
> The United States of America and their leader Barrack Hussein Obama have
> spent billions of dollars in Syria, at a time when US taxpayers are
> suffering, attempting to bring about a change of regime. The money has
> been spent funding Al-Qaeda and Islamic terrorists to destabilize the
> country, groups that they have parroted time and time again as being the
> number one enemies of the American people.
>
> Their strategy was
> failing, like all of their strategies are bound to fail because they
> lack vision and true understanding of the world and its people. They
> created a red line, most likely launched a black operation to make that
> red line a reality and now with extreme desperate irrational urgency,
> they want to carry out their plan to attack Syria. That is their goal,
> they set it, and no matter what happens they will obtusely carry it out
> without regard for the consequences and without forward planning.
>
> I
> would put forward that the goal of the United States is not to remove
> President Bashar Al-Assad, just as it is not to protect the Syrian
> people. As for Al-Assad he offered to step down multiple times in the
> past and if the true goal was simply removing him, they could have
> assassinated him years ago. Unless the CIA has grown completely
> incompetent that is.
>
> As for the Syrian people, it is clear that all
> of the bloodshed and loss of life in the country has been caused because
> of, and almost exclusively by, the terrorist elements that the United
> States has been training, funding, arming and importing.
> So if they
> do not want to remove Assad what do they want? Now this is part of the
> secret geopolitical agenda they seek for the Middle East. I would put
> forward that the real goal is to destabilize and destroy the country and
> the people and throw Syria into anarchy. This will create yet another
> weak and broken country from which they can steal resources and which
> they can manipulate as they wish. Look at the record: Afghanistan, Iraq,
> Libya and all of the other countries in the Middle East that they have
> destabilized and destroyed through other means.
>
> Ala Zbigniew
> Brzeznski and his plans to destabilize Russia into sixty-some-odd
> autonomous republics, the plans for the Middle East are almost
> identical, and the people of all of these countries just get in the way.
> Why else attack countries that pose no threat? Iraq never threatened
> America, nor did Afghanistan or Libya. Neither has Syria.
>
> These
> states did possess independent foreign policies and that has been their
> only crime. Other than of course, in the case of Iraq and Libya, the
> fact that hours before the attacks on their countries, the leaders
> changed the trade in oil from the dollar to the euro. Something that
> would completely destroy the United States if all of the countries of
> the world followed suit. Hence they need to destabilize the economy of
> Europe and all of the instruments that have been implemented to carry
> that out. The US cannot allow the euro to grow as an alternative
> currency, because the US economy will be destroyed. The United States
> has technically long been economically bankrupt. As for moral, well that
> is also obvious.
>
> It is interesting to note, from a militarily
> strategic viewpoint, that by intentionally telegraphing that they are
> planning to attack, and even setting the date, they are guaranteeing
> that President Al-Assad will be protected and they are contributing to
> the massive civilian losses that will occur.
>
> There will be no chance
> of a “surgical strike” because all of the important targets will already
> be moved or protected. So in order to achieve whatever military
> objectives there are this will require even more fire power and more
> missiles, something which of course will be very profitable and
> beneficial for Raytheon and all of the other US war contractors.
> Telegraphing will also allow for Syria to set up defenses, if it has not
> already, to knock all of the US’s million dollar missiles out of the
> sky. Something it has every right to do.
>
> The plan to strike Syria
> is not only one of cowardice and an admission of utter and complete
> failure by the United States on the diplomatic front but it is also
> illegal without a United Nations resolution and an imminent threat to
> America itself. It is obviously cowardly because launching missiles
> while fearfully hiding behind a shield where there is no threat to
> yourself is not something that an honorable soldier on a battlefield
> would do. It is the tactic of a coward.
> This tactic however is
> necessary for Obama because when the massive loss of American lives
> begins, the American people will rise up and no longer support all of
> the callous unthinking military adventures. Hence what some view as the
> illogical funding of Al-Qaeda and terrorists to carry out the dirty
> work.
>
> What will happen when these terrorist elements begin to
> realize that they have been merely disposable pawns for the US and that
> they have been killing their own brothers and mothers and sisters? Of
> course the US has not thought of that. The backlash when Al-Qaeda and
> all of the motley groups of terrorists realize they have been killing
> their brethren for the enemy will be monumental and Americans will
> finally see what real terrorism is all about, I believe that is a given.
> But that is okay for Washington too, they have all of the plans in
> place and this will allow the military industrial complex to expand and
> invade even more countries. What are a few American lives?
>
> What
> about Israel? As I have said in the past, in reality the United States
> does not care about Israel. The maelstrom that will occur if the US
> strikes Syria will be monumental and right in the middle of it will be
> the Jewish state. Washington, thousands of miles away, behind a missile
> shield, with all of its leaders protected and hiding in bunkers, will be
> safe. Of course the US has convinced Israel that they are safe, but I
> beg to differ.
>
> Let this be a warning then to reactionary proponents of an
> attack on Syria: the results will be monumental and may lead to the
> self-destruction of America both economically and politically. Why? For
> one it will further bankrupt an already decimated economy. Two, it will
> also polarize enemies and cause countries around the world to strike
> back, meaning the world community may in fact realize that it is time to
> reign in and end the continual invasions and aggressive wars being
> waged by the US
> This will be particularly true when it is revealed that the chemical attack
> in Syria was a black operation to give Obama his pretext to carry out
> another Nobel-Peace-Prize-winning-act-of-aggression. If the world wakes
> up that is.
>
> This last point will no doubt fall on deaf ears, or in this case “on blind
> eyes”, but in reality the US is missing a very important opportunity in
> Syria, and that is a chance to rebuild its reputation and become a
> respected intelligent and grown up member and leader of the world
> community by simply promoting a peaceful resolution. The world is truly
> tired of US bombs and bellicose rhetoric and the actions of an arrogant
> one-world-power wantonly bashing and bullying its way across the globe.
>
> My thoughts are with the Syrian people and my hope is that someone,
> somewhere, with the power to stop this madness will listen. How about it
> President of the United States of America Barrack Hussein Obama? Maybe
> it is time to use diplomacy and work for peace and to finally put the
> weapons down? You have a Nobel Peace Prize after all. Or does that mean
> nothing?
>
> Read more:
> http://voiceofrussia.com/news/2013_08_28/Attack-on-Syria-may-cause-massive-damage-to-the-US-1204/
>
>
>
>
>
> btw .. breaking news Confirmed: #Russia and #China have officially
> withdrawn from security council meeting on #Syria
>
> Egypt will not allow US & UK warships through Suez canal to attack Syria
> (Egpytian News)
>
> According
> to Egyptian TV, Pinochet Sisi - the House of Saud protege - is NOT
> allowing US and UK warships to pass through the Suez Canal; they will,
> obviously, attack Syria. Cairo is AGAINST Obama's Tomahawk war.
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Haim Barak <haim357@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: cryptome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2013 1:45 PM
> Subject: [cryptome] Re: Syria
>
>
>
>
> http://news.softpedia.com/news/Melbourne-IT-Blog-Hacked-and-Defaced-by-Syrian-Electronic-Army-378830.shtml
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Haim Barak <haim357@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> https://twitter.com/ZonedSecurity/status/372772194645856256
> >
> >
> >
> >On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Haim Barak <haim357@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Obama administration official confirmed that a final decision is to go
> to a military attack Assad's regime for its use of chemical weapons against
> its citizens.
> >>Administration official confirmed that the U.S. is at the point of no
> return, as he put it, with regard to the attack itself, he said the timing
> has not yet been determined.
> >>
> >>The evening ended with emergency session of the Security Council of the
> UN on whether to accept the British proposal and approve military action
> against Syria. Before the debate ended unofficial representatives left
> Russia and China the place to protest the intent to attack Assad's regime.
> >>
> >>Tonight reported further that Turkey has raised the security alert
> level. Network to the Arab - reported today that the Syrian government
> cleared a key government institutions and security were considered
> potential targets for attack. Among other things, turns the base of the
> fourth division of the Syrian army, at Jabel Ksion Damascus.
> >>
> >>Defense believe that Israel will remain out of the picture. Netanyahu
> asked ministers not "chatter" in the media. Limited statements from the
> chief of staff and defense minister were coordinated with the prime
> minister. Comes to warning messages Syrian rocket attacks on Israel.
> >>Condition imposed on Israel: Although we are not in the picture, but
> because the world decided to punish the Syrians, we are supposed to be on
> the line for them.
> >>I would like to see the U.S. reaction, the English and the French, if
> the Syrians were threatening them with missiles on their heads if they
> Iitkifo them, and we suffer because of it.
> >>
> >>I wonder what was public opinion in the U.S., England and France, if
> that were the face of things.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Haim Barak <haim357@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >>Thank you ,No words to thank the interpretation,,,,,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 1:55 PM, coderman <coderman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 8:21 AM, John Young <jya@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>> ...
> >>>>
> >>>>> One vote for Eugen, one vote for Haim, one vote for everyone
> >>>>> dead or alive. Rig them votes, sock them puppets.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>everyone who is seemingly stymied by mail filters, deferring their
> >>>>input evaluation to third party "moderators", is a lazy lout or
> >>>>negligent nincompoop!
> >>>>
> >>>>your personal responsibility upon joining any list is to evaluate the
> >>>>origin and content of received communications and apply filters or
> >>>>mute accordingly.
> >>>>
> >>>>do not shirk this responsibility to others, lest the blinders and echo
> >>>>chamber cripple mind...
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>--
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Haim Barak
> >>>To Serve and Protect Our Community
> >>>In God We Trust
> >>>Israel#: 5353...
> >>>Email: haim357@xxxxxxxxx
> >>>Skype: haim.357
> >>>http://haim357.wordpress.com/
> >>>
> >>>This e-mail is intended only for the named recipient(s) and may contain
> >>>information that is privileged, confidential and/or exempt from
> >>>disclosure under applicable law. No waiver of privilege, confidence or
> >>>otherwise is intended by virtue of communication via the Internet. Any
> >>>unauthorized use, dissemination or copying is strictly prohibited.
> >>>Thank you.
> >>
> >>
> >>--
> >>
> >>
> >>Haim Barak
> >>To Serve and Protect Our Community
> >>In God We Trust
> >>Israel#: 5353...
> >>Email: haim357@xxxxxxxxx
> >>Skype: haim.357
> >>http://haim357.wordpress.com/
> >>
> >>This e-mail is intended only for the named recipient(s) and may contain
> >>information that is privileged, confidential and/or exempt from
> >>disclosure under applicable law. No waiver of privilege, confidence or
> >>otherwise is intended by virtue of communication via the Internet. Any
> >>unauthorized use, dissemination or copying is strictly prohibited.
> >>Thank you.
> >
> >
> >--
> >
> >
> >Haim Barak
> >To Serve and Protect Our Community
> >In God We Trust
> >Israel#: 5353...
> >Email: haim357@xxxxxxxxx
> >Skype: haim.357
> >http://haim357.wordpress.com/
> >
> >This e-mail is intended only for the named recipient(s) and may contain
> >information that is privileged, confidential and/or exempt from
> >disclosure under applicable law. No waiver of privilege, confidence or
> >otherwise is intended by virtue of communication via the Internet. Any
> >unauthorized use, dissemination or copying is strictly prohibited.
> >Thank you.
>
>
> --
>
>
> Haim Barak
> To Serve and Protect Our Community
> In God We Trust
> Israel#: 5353...
> Email: haim357@xxxxxxxxx
> Skype: haim.357
> http://haim357.wordpress.com/
>
> This e-mail is intended only for the named recipient(s) and may contain
> information that is privileged, confidential and/or exempt from
> disclosure under applicable law. No waiver of privilege, confidence or
> otherwise is intended by virtue of communication via the Internet. Any
> unauthorized use, dissemination or copying is strictly prohibited.
> Thank you.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 17:02:51 -0400
> Subject: [cryptome] Re: Fw: Realtime air traffic & web attacks 90% increase
> From: Haim Barak <haim357@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks Brian,,,,
>
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Brian Hecht <brian.hecht@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >wrote:
>
> >
> > *U.S. Web Attacks Skyrocket Ahead of Mid East Action: 89.8% Above Normal
> > *Real Time Heat Map**
> > According to Akamai, which monitors global internet conditions, the
> United
> > States is experiencing a surge in web attacks today, clocking in at 90%
> > above normal.
> >
> > http://www.akamai.com/html/technology/dataviz1.html
> >
> > Real Time Air Traffic .. zoom in on Cyprus and Syria
> >
> > http://planefinder.net/
> >
> > ----- Forwarded Message -----
> > *From:* Brian Hecht <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > *To:* "cryptome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <cryptome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 28, 2013 3:05 PM
> > *Subject:* Re: [cryptome] Re: Syria -artcile on The Voice of Russia
> >
> >
> >
> > The United States of America and their leader Barrack Hussein Obama have
> > spent billions of dollars in Syria, at a time when US taxpayers are
> > suffering, attempting to bring about a change of regime. The money has
> been
> > spent funding Al-Qaeda and Islamic terrorists to destabilize the country,
> > groups that they have parroted time and time again as being the number
> one
> > enemies of the American people.
> >
> > Their strategy was failing, like all of their strategies are bound to
> fail
> > because they lack vision and true understanding of the world and its
> > people. They created a red line, most likely launched a black operation
> to
> > make that red line a reality and now with extreme desperate irrational
> > urgency, they want to carry out their plan to attack Syria. That is their
> > goal, they set it, and no matter what happens they will obtusely carry it
> > out without regard for the consequences and without forward planning.
> >
> > I would put forward that the goal of the United States is not to remove
> > President Bashar Al-Assad, just as it is not to protect the Syrian
> people.
> > As for Al-Assad he offered to step down multiple times in the past and if
> > the true goal was simply removing him, they could have assassinated him
> > years ago. Unless the CIA has grown completely incompetent that is.
> >
> > As for the Syrian people, it is clear that all of the bloodshed and loss
> > of life in the country has been caused because of, and almost exclusively
> > by, the terrorist elements that the United States has been training,
> > funding, arming and importing.
> > So if they do not want to remove Assad what do they want? Now this is
> part
> > of the secret geopolitical agenda they seek for the Middle East. I would
> > put forward that the real goal is to destabilize and destroy the country
> > and the people and throw Syria into anarchy. This will create yet another
> > weak and broken country from which they can steal resources and which
> they
> > can manipulate as they wish. Look at the record: Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya
> > and all of the other countries in the Middle East that they have
> > destabilized and destroyed through other means.
> >
> > Ala Zbigniew Brzeznski and his plans to destabilize Russia into
> > sixty-some-odd autonomous republics, the plans for the Middle East are
> > almost identical, and the people of all of these countries just get in
> the
> > way. Why else attack countries that pose no threat? Iraq never threatened
> > America, nor did Afghanistan or Libya. Neither has Syria.
> >
> > These states did possess independent foreign policies and that has been
> > their only crime. Other than of course, in the case of Iraq and Libya,
> the
> > fact that hours before the attacks on their countries, the leaders
> changed
> > the trade in oil from the dollar to the euro. Something that would
> > completely destroy the United States if all of the countries of the world
> > followed suit. Hence they need to destabilize the economy of Europe and
> all
> > of the instruments that have been implemented to carry that out. The US
> > cannot allow the euro to grow as an alternative currency, because the US
> > economy will be destroyed. The United States has technically long been
> > economically bankrupt. As for moral, well that is also obvious.
> >
> > It is interesting to note, from a militarily strategic viewpoint, that by
> > intentionally telegraphing that they are planning to attack, and even
> > setting the date, they are guaranteeing that President Al-Assad will be
> > protected and they are contributing to the massive civilian losses that
> > will occur.
> >
> > There will be no chance of a “surgical strike” because all of the
> > important targets will already be moved or protected. So in order to
> > achieve whatever military objectives there are this will require even
> more
> > fire power and more missiles, something which of course will be very
> > profitable and beneficial for Raytheon and all of the other US war
> > contractors. Telegraphing will also allow for Syria to set up defenses,
> if
> > it has not already, to knock all of the US’s million dollar missiles out
> of
> > the sky. Something it has every right to do.
> >
> > The plan to strike Syria is not only one of cowardice and an admission of
> > utter and complete failure by the United States on the diplomatic front
> but
> > it is also illegal without a United Nations resolution and an imminent
> > threat to America itself. It is obviously cowardly because launching
> > missiles while fearfully hiding behind a shield where there is no threat
> to
> > yourself is not something that an honorable soldier on a battlefield
> would
> > do. It is the tactic of a coward.
> > This tactic however is necessary for Obama because when the massive loss
> > of American lives begins, the American people will rise up and no longer
> > support all of the callous unthinking military adventures. Hence what
> some
> > view as the illogical funding of Al-Qaeda and terrorists to carry out the
> > dirty work.
> >
> > What will happen when these terrorist elements begin to realize that they
> > have been merely disposable pawns for the US and that they have been
> > killing their own brothers and mothers and sisters? Of course the US has
> > not thought of that. The backlash when Al-Qaeda and all of the motley
> > groups of terrorists realize they have been killing their brethren for
> the
> > enemy will be monumental and Americans will finally see what real
> terrorism
> > is all about, I believe that is a given. But that is okay for Washington
> > too, they have all of the plans in place and this will allow the military
> > industrial complex to expand and invade even more countries. What are a
> few
> > American lives?
> >
> > What about Israel? As I have said in the past, in reality the United
> > States does not care about Israel. The maelstrom that will occur if the
> US
> > strikes Syria will be monumental and right in the middle of it will be
> the
> > Jewish state. Washington, thousands of miles away, behind a missile
> shield,
> > with all of its leaders protected and hiding in bunkers, will be safe. Of
> > course the US has convinced Israel that they are safe, but I beg to
> differ.
> >
> > Let this be a warning then to reactionary proponents of an attack on
> > Syria: the results will be monumental and may lead to the
> self-destruction
> > of America both economically and politically. Why? For one it will
> further
> > bankrupt an already decimated economy. Two, it will also polarize enemies
> > and cause countries around the world to strike back, meaning the world
> > community may in fact realize that it is time to reign in and end the
> > continual invasions and aggressive wars being waged by the US
> > This will be particularly true when it is revealed that the chemical
> > attack in Syria was a black operation to give Obama his pretext to carry
> > out another Nobel-Peace-Prize-winning-act-of-aggression. If the world
> wakes
> > up that is.
> >
> > This last point will no doubt fall on deaf ears, or in this case “on
> blind
> > eyes”, but in reality the US is missing a very important opportunity in
> > Syria, and that is a chance to rebuild its reputation and become a
> > respected intelligent and grown up member and leader of the world
> community
> > by simply promoting a peaceful resolution. The world is truly tired of US
> > bombs and bellicose rhetoric and the actions of an arrogant
> one-world-power
> > wantonly bashing and bullying its way across the globe.
> >
> > My thoughts are with the Syrian people and my hope is that someone,
> > somewhere, with the power to stop this madness will listen. How about it
> > President of the United States of America Barrack Hussein Obama? Maybe it
> > is time to use diplomacy and work for peace and to finally put the
> weapons
> > down? You have a Nobel Peace Prize after all. Or does that mean nothing?
> >
> > Read more:
> >
> http://voiceofrussia.com/news/2013_08_28/Attack-on-Syria-may-cause-massive-damage-to-the-US-1204/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > btw .. breaking news Confirmed: #Russia and #China have officially
> > withdrawn from security council meeting on #Syria
> >
> > Egypt will not allow US & UK warships through Suez canal to attack Syria
> > (Egpytian News)
> >
> > According to Egyptian TV, Pinochet Sisi - the House of Saud protege - is
> > NOT allowing US and UK warships to pass through the Suez Canal; they
> will,
> > obviously, attack Syria. Cairo is AGAINST Obama's Tomahawk war.
> >
> > ------------------------------
> > *From:* Haim Barak <haim357@xxxxxxxxx>
> > *To:* cryptome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 28, 2013 1:45 PM
> > *Subject:* [cryptome] Re: Syria
> >
> >
> >
> http://news.softpedia.com/news/Melbourne-IT-Blog-Hacked-and-Defaced-by-Syrian-Electronic-Army-378830.shtml
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Haim Barak <haim357@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > https://twitter.com/ZonedSecurity/status/372772194645856256
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Haim Barak <haim357@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Obama administration official confirmed that a final decision is to go
> > to a military attack Assad's regime for its use of chemical weapons
> against
> > its citizens.
> > Administration official confirmed that the U.S. is at the point of no
> > return, as he put it, with regard to the attack itself, he said the
> timing
> > has not yet been determined.
> >
> > The evening ended with emergency session of the Security Council of the
> UN
> > on whether to accept the British proposal and approve military action
> > against Syria. Before the debate ended unofficial representatives left
> > Russia and China the place to protest the intent to attack Assad's
> regime.
> >
> > Tonight reported further that Turkey has raised the security alert
> level. Network
> > to the Arab - reported today that the Syrian government cleared a key
> > government institutions and security were considered potential targets
> for
> > attack. Among other things, turns the base of the fourth division of the
> > Syrian army, at Jabel Ksion Damascus.
> >
> > Defense believe that Israel will remain out of the picture. Netanyahu
> > asked ministers not "chatter" in the media. Limited statements from the
> > chief of staff and defense minister were coordinated with the prime
> > minister. Comes to warning messages Syrian rocket attacks on Israel.
> > Condition imposed on Israel: Although we are not in the picture, but
> > because the world decided to punish the Syrians, we are supposed to be on
> > the line for them.
> > I would like to see the U.S. reaction, the English and the French, if the
> > Syrians were threatening them with missiles on their heads if they
> Iitkifo
> > them, and we suffer because of it.
> >
> > I wonder what was public opinion in the U.S., England and France, if that
> > were the face of things.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Haim Barak <haim357@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Thank you ,No words to thank the interpretation,,,,,
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 1:55 PM, coderman <coderman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 8:21 AM, John Young <jya@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > ...
> > > One vote for Eugen, one vote for Haim, one vote for everyone
> > > dead or alive. Rig them votes, sock them puppets.
> >
> >
> > everyone who is seemingly stymied by mail filters, deferring their
> > input evaluation to third party "moderators", is a lazy lout or
> > negligent nincompoop!
> >
> > your personal responsibility upon joining any list is to evaluate the
> > origin and content of received communications and apply filters or
> > mute accordingly.
> >
> > do not shirk this responsibility to others, lest the blinders and echo
> > chamber cripple mind...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Haim Barak
> > To Serve and Protect Our Community
> > In God We Trust
> > Israel#: 5353...
> > Email: haim357@xxxxxxxxx
> > Skype: haim.357
> > http://haim357.wordpress.com/
> >
> > <http://haim357.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/banner.jpg>
> > This e-mail is intended only for the named recipient(s) and may contain
> > information that is privileged, confidential and/or exempt from
> > disclosure under applicable law. No waiver of privilege, confidence or
> > otherwise is intended by virtue of communication via the Internet. Any
> > unauthorized use, dissemination or copying is strictly prohibited.
> > Thank you.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Haim Barak
> > To Serve and Protect Our Community
> > In God We Trust
> > Israel#: 5353...
> > Email: haim357@xxxxxxxxx
> > Skype: haim.357
> > http://haim357.wordpress.com/
> >
> > <http://haim357.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/banner.jpg>
> > This e-mail is intended only for the named recipient(s) and may contain
> > information that is privileged, confidential and/or exempt from
> > disclosure under applicable law. No waiver of privilege, confidence or
> > otherwise is intended by virtue of communication via the Internet. Any
> > unauthorized use, dissemination or copying is strictly prohibited.
> > Thank you.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Haim Barak
> > To Serve and Protect Our Community
> > In God We Trust
> > Israel#: 5353...
> > Email: haim357@xxxxxxxxx
> > Skype: haim.357
> > http://haim357.wordpress.com/
> >
> > <http://haim357.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/banner.jpg>
> > This e-mail is intended only for the named recipient(s) and may contain
> > information that is privileged, confidential and/or exempt from
> > disclosure under applicable law. No waiver of privilege, confidence or
> > otherwise is intended by virtue of communication via the Internet. Any
> > unauthorized use, dissemination or copying is strictly prohibited.
> > Thank you.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Haim Barak
> > To Serve and Protect Our Community
> > In God We Trust
> > Israel#: 5353...
> > Email: haim357@xxxxxxxxx
> > Skype: haim.357
> > http://haim357.wordpress.com/
> >
> > <http://haim357.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/banner.jpg>
> > This e-mail is intended only for the named recipient(s) and may contain
> > information that is privileged, confidential and/or exempt from
> > disclosure under applicable law. No waiver of privilege, confidence or
> > otherwise is intended by virtue of communication via the Internet. Any
> > unauthorized use, dissemination or copying is strictly prohibited.
> > Thank you.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> Haim Barak
> To Serve and Protect Our Community
> In God We Trust
> Israel#: 5353...
> Email: haim357@xxxxxxxxx
> Skype: haim.357
> http://haim357.wordpress.com/
>
>
> <http://haim357.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/banner.jpg>
>
> This e-mail is intended only for the named recipient(s) and may contain
> information that is privileged, confidential and/or exempt from
> disclosure under applicable law. No waiver of privilege, confidence or
> otherwise is intended by virtue of communication via the Internet. Any
> unauthorized use, dissemination or copying is strictly prohibited.
> Thank you.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 17:46:34 -0400
> From: John Young <jya@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [cryptome] Re: Fw: Realtime air traffic & web attacks 90%
>
> Indeed, both of these are intriguing.
>
> Would be helpful to know which of the attacks are by governments
> and their contractors.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of cryptome Digest V2 #43
> *****************************
>
>
Other related posts:
- » [cryptome] Re: cryptome Digest V2 #43 - Brynjar Fredriksen
