Interesting point. Why we trust that maillist ? Because half seems true.
And outsmart the true from false.
There is so many reasons not to get considered, like on a chess board.
We are not playing, and almost are not on the roadmap of intelligence.
Intel is not espionage, but outsmart data to triger informations, this is
Maybe you look too many movies; but facts are there.
Cryptom is and will still be a troll place, and their admins the best
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 10:10 PM, Sean Lynch <seanl@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 8:05 AM Cari Machet <carimachet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
the intercept will never fucking "step up" and fuck you for writing such
Cari, I've dug through my mail archives to try to figure out what it is
you have against The Intercept, and while I can't claim to have closely
read every hit for your name and "intercept," I have been unable to find
any reason you've given for your hatred. I did see a mention of a friend in
prison, which seems like it may be somehow related?
I'm genuinely curious, because I don't have direct experience with anyone
involved beyond their public reputations in relatively mainstream sources,
so if there is a reason I should not be trusting them or Glenn Greenwald,
it would be very helpful to know that. Of course, since I don't have any
more reason to trust you than to trust Glenn, I'd appreciate anything you
can provide that I can verify without too much effort.